Members frequentsoapfan Posted September 26, 2012 Members Share Posted September 26, 2012 No Liz and Spinelli were supporting characters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alexisfan07 Posted September 26, 2012 Members Share Posted September 26, 2012 So you're telling me Herbst has been on this show 15 years and was never once considered a leading lady? I'm sorry but I don't buy that For those wondering about the timeline of the Jason/Liz/Sam baby stuff, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members miche Posted September 26, 2012 Members Share Posted September 26, 2012 That was around the time where Liz was just another piece of Jason's box of pain and Spinelli was another one of Lulu puppies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cheap21 Posted September 26, 2012 Members Share Posted September 26, 2012 Oh by Liz was sounding like a delusional skank in her scene with Carly. Cant beleive she actually altered the test results. How desperate can she get? Still playing manipulative tricks to snag a man. This goes down as one of the worst things she's done Oh lord, I cant with this story. I just CANT Did NOT like Todd having Kate bagged and manhandled. What is he now, a mobster? Also disgusting how he's using and taking advantage of Kate's DID, considering the history he has with it in his family Blaming her actions on Jake's death IMO is a copout. She had her mini breakdown last year and she's been relatively fine since. Its very out of character for her to act like this and it screams of desperation bc she needs a man to latch onto and all the others in her recent circle have moved on from her (Nik, Lucky, Matt, Ewen). She's grabbing onto Jason now bc she doesnt want to lose him but he's not hers to have. For her to manipulate things to let Sam continue thinking her baby is dead is just low. I dont know how she can justify that with herself. And why does she do it? For a man? Really? A man that just said he doesnt want her on top of that I would say she was a leading lady during SoS (and no I wont get into that). She was definetly a younger lead actress during her initial romance with Lucky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alexisfan07 Posted September 26, 2012 Members Share Posted September 26, 2012 Yeah I didn't like that either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alexisfan07 Posted September 26, 2012 Members Share Posted September 26, 2012 LMAO this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZ6CQ9D7xcg&feature=player_detailpage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted September 26, 2012 Members Share Posted September 26, 2012 Todd's always roughed up women, and used DID to get out of criminal charges. The problem is the show writes him as everyone's beloved kooky uncle, so when the real Todd comes out to play, it's like being shanked by Paul Lynde. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members frequentsoapfan Posted September 26, 2012 Members Share Posted September 26, 2012 The background music sounded like something a couple would have sex to on DAYS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted September 26, 2012 Members Share Posted September 26, 2012 She looks like Suzy Cote here. If Suzy Cote was in this story I might care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members frequentsoapfan Posted September 26, 2012 Members Share Posted September 26, 2012 I don't know why they have two professionals at the hospital in these childish fantasies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cheap21 Posted September 26, 2012 Members Share Posted September 26, 2012 two new people we dont know at that. This storyline is so juvenile. I cant stand this Sabrina chick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members allmc2008 Posted September 26, 2012 Members Share Posted September 26, 2012 I am starting to notice why nobody likes RC's writing style! I wrote this on another board! Don't get me wrong because I really like what he has done with GH BUT if he has to stoop to explaining these things about characters to the audience via twitter he is not doing his job as a writer. He has to convince people what he sees in these characters to the audience right from the get-go by only using the using the actors and the television as a tool to help his case. I just realized that he broke the Marland rule that I love the most: 6. Don't change a core character. You can certainly give them edges they didn't have before, or give them a logical reason to change their behavior. But when the audience says, "He would never do that," then you have failed. I hated the scene yesterday when Carly decided to go to that restaurant Sam was at. It was so obvious on what was getting ready to happen. I think the Lorraine Broderick and FV would work good together but RC is just not right for the job!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members frequentsoapfan Posted September 26, 2012 Members Share Posted September 26, 2012 I hate when shows tell you who to root for. I usually start rooting against that person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members frequentsoapfan Posted September 26, 2012 Members Share Posted September 26, 2012 How about we just can FV all together? He's a horrible EP and over controlling while the show still looks like crap. Too bad Lisa Cazotte is employed by DAYS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ChitHappens Posted September 26, 2012 Members Share Posted September 26, 2012 Carly has had way too many "WTF" moments to count! I wish these clowns would go away! Hooray to anyone who appreciates what Cartooni has to offer, but they are the worst GH regime this show has ever had. Their dollar store GH is for the dogs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.