Jump to content

RUMOR REPORT: YR Fires Vet!!!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

This is unfortunate, but I honestly don't think it will make a huge difference. As much as I love Davidson, I've never viewed Ashley Abbott as a lead on Y&R in the entire time I've been watching. She's certainly more expendable than MTS, Stafford, Walton or even Cooper.

But if Y&R wanted to cut a big salary, why not start with Genie Francis, who was an epic fail from the beginning, Greg Rikaart, who hasn't had a storyline that hasn't flopped since about 2006, or even Sharon Case, whose character has been ruined so much it's laughable (not that there was much to ruin in the first place)?

I hope Davidson goes back to B&B. Brad Bell actually seemed to know how to write for her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 161
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Guess that means Eve Plumb is out of another job.

Because MAB & Co. clearly don't watch their own show and therefore have no idea what isn't working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I LOVE ED on Y&R, believe me. But she's FAR more needed at DAYS and her talents would be put to much better use there on a much happier set. A long-term storyline with mini arcs involving Kristen, Stefano, Marlena, and John is just what the show needs. I say go for it!

As for Y&R, ya'll know the drum I'm beating.

BRING BACK BRENDA EPPERSON as THE REAL ASHLEY ABBOTT!!!

and Mark Collier as her love interest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Try Steve Kent & Co, AKA SONY. I blame MAB/Sheffer/Hamner for most of the writing decisions I see on the show.

But Casting Issues (and UN-Casting issues for that matter) I think mostly boil down to SONY and their tight pockets, not to mention their lack of knowledge about what works on Y&R.

Because, frankly, Davidson and Ashley are one of VERY FEW things that are working with the show right now and there are at least 25-30 people I'd fire before her. Hell, I can think of 6 people that could go right now and free up the money for Davidson, a Kimberlin Brown return, and a Victoria Rowell return.

Seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But try to look at it as something that could actually work out two fold:

Eileen can return to DAYS ( as Kristen ONLY .....at first.......with some doses of Susan here and there) and be just what the show needs to experience a ratings spike. In fact, I think that Eileen Davidson is the only actress that could return to a show right now and actually have a MAJOR impact on ratings. It's not just the Kristen character, but what Kristen can do for people like John, Marlena, Roman, Stefano, EJ, Billie, Laura (if they chose to bring her back), Jennifer......the list goes on and on. I truly believe Eileen could and would save DAYS.

Secondly, start campaigning for Brenda Epperson to return to Y&R as Ashley. She made a FABULOUS Ashley and I truly believe this decision is based solely on money and a desire for ED to go back to DAYS and not at all about wanting Ashley off the canvas (like it was with LML).. Let's face it, Epperson would come A LOT cheaper than Davidson, has the appeal and charm to win over fans who never saw her work and appease the outrage of those who have watched Y&R through Ashley's entire run. In FACT, I plan on Facebooking Brenda tomorrow (we chat now & then) and telling her to get her people on it & fast. Instead of writing Ashley a permanent exit story, they could write her one that's short term and bring Epperson back in. Plus, I'd be curious to see her chemistry with Nichols (although I do think he had it in spades with Davidson).

Look at the positives Cat and I'm sorry, but I just don't see ED or Ashley going to B&B as a positive. With the cast of characters that show has now and the youth-oriented stories they're focusing on, they'd Lesli Kay the hell out of ED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's always so nice to see the Brenda Epperson fans around! I loved her as Ashley and she will always be my favorite. And this is the right time for a comeback since passnum1 has been putting her episodes on Youtube. I don't think I'd want to see her at Y&R these days but if there is a campaign I hope she gets hired at Y&R or somewhere. If I was on Twitter I'd do that campaign some DAYS fans are doing.

Marcy needs to exorcise that set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I appreciate your take on the subject.

ED has always been "my" Ashley. Confession: I took a break from Y&R when Brenda Epperson was in the role. So the only person I can relate to as this character is Davidson. I will go to YouTube to watch Epperson's work in order to get a better appreciation.

I honestly think ED deserves better than that hokey, false-teeth nonsense, but if she came back as Kristen only, I think she would be a shot in the arm to that show. So far, the only returns that have been a success for me have been Dee Hall and Lisa Rinna.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Epperson was my first Ashley as well. There was a very lovable and sweet quality to her take on the character that I don't find in Davidson's (who I love as well).

I really couldn't see Epperson's Ashley acting out spermgate or most of Ashley's recent stories.

While I think Davidson is the definitive Ashley, I think Epperson did breathe new life into the character for a while and her take was just as popular during her years on the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd be fine with Epperson as Ashley as well. When I started watching Y&R when I was young, that's actually who was in the role anyways. As much as it pisses me off they fired Davidson before about 15 others who needed to go first, DAYS needs her more than Y&R does at the moment and Epperson was a fine Ashley back in the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually just IMed Brenda on Facebook and it was the first she'd heard it (she's been out of the soap scene for quite a bit, so no surprise there). She asked if it could be a ploy, as some actors do that, but I assured her that it wasn't, that ED was gone, and it's more than likely about money than it is about the Ashley character. That said, she said she would phone Braeden tomorrow, get the story as he knows it, and go from there. Her initial response was to remind me that there "is an Ashley" which I informed her there was not. I also told her that her name had been brought up on some of the boards as who people would like to see take over the part. Who knows if it'll happen, but at least it's been put out there into the universe. I for one would LOVE to see it happen.

And I'd call her far more than "serviceable" as Ashley. Just because she softened Ashley's bitchier side some doesn't mean she wasn't Ashley and didn't make the character her own because she did, sometimes with better results and performances than we ever would have gotten out of Davidson as Ashley (especially when you consider this period of her career- Awkward & miscast as SB's Kelly, and generic and seemingly out of place during the first couple years of her DAYS run).

Though I might agree we may not see her lead a story again, but how long has it been since Eileen has actually lead a story as Ash? It didn't happen under LML and it certainly hasn't happened under this regime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Recent Posts

    • I think we have learned by now that you can never be sure anyone's actually dead on a soap...
    • I think this has been one of the best years in a long time. In no small part due to the fact that so many countries have chosen to sing in their native language. Songs like the ones from Greece and Latvia have benefitted immensely from this, and made those two personal favourites of mine. I think Greece has the most incredibly beautiful staging and Klavdia's voice is outstanding. I don't think she has any real chance of winning, but if she did I would be ecstatic. Luxembourg is another favourite of mine and Laura (with her dancers) really sold that song with the new staging. Her performance in the final was flawless and I will be very disappointed if she doesn't improve on last year's result for Luxembourg (13th).
    • If those came from that mass-produced CD that was put out a while back, I'm afraid those episodes are wildly out of order and are very confusing to listen to. I had to painstakingly put them in order to make sense of things. I need to make my own CD to give to people just to try and fix the problem. Thankfully, I had time during the lockdown to do that. Just a word of warning. 
    • Some spoilery press photos:

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • With so many reference to Caroline, how many months before 'Linus' appears? We already know *twins* run in the Spencer family. We know very little about Liam's birth, etc. Please tell me it'll never happen. Brad undercutting the significance of Steffy/Hope scenes, which were great, by having Steffy squeal to Taylor less than an hour later. I was initially glad that Carter finally got a leading man story, except they've completely destroyed what made him likeable - from the imaginary House of Forrester, fake LLC papers and, Friday, he blames everything on Hope. Gross. Daphne being certain that Hope would go back to Liam is contrived. She knows nothing about their history. How many times has the Nose met Liam? If, say, Katie, Ridge or Steffy made the suggestion, at least, it would be believable from those characters' history/point-of-view.  
    • Sometimes I forget Mindy had been married four times in the space of a decade. Those are Erica Kane numbers. 
    • This is Part 2 but I was wrong, there is no 3.  Today we are going review one of the questions: “What are your thoughts on the validity of the Daytime Emmy Awards?”  At this time, there was a lot of negative feelings about the awards, from the politics, the nomination process and even, where should they be held. MARY STUART: “No, comment.  No, I really think it’s silly.  It’s only an award for one particular performance, too.  It’s ridiculous.” CARL LOW: “I understand they’re trying to change the format of selection, because a one-shot performance does not reflect a year’s work.  Who can remember that one particular performance?” MARY STUART: “You’re supposed to save it.  Three years in a row my tapes were erased.  So I’m ineligible?  One of the other sponsors said they didn’t want anyone on a P&G show nominated.  Does that make sense?  And the people who really hold the industry together never have any juicy scenes.  People like Charita Bauer and Carl Low.  I wish it were not a national game, but instead, a peer activity.  I would believe in it if it were presented by our peers and it were private, within the industry from people who really care.  Then it means something.” Mary made some very valid points. Until 1976, except for her nomination in the first year, no actor for a P&G show was nominated in the first two years of the awards. So, 1974 one nominee & 1975 zero nominees. That means only one out of about a hundred actors over five shows (SFT, EON, GL, ATWT and AW) were not nominated. LARRY HAINES: “I don’t think there should be fewer categories in daytime than there are in nighttime awards.  If there is one for best performer, there has got to be one for best supporting performer, because nobody plays in a vacuum.  It’s not a one person effort.  The categories are voted on by a completely unbiased panel.” BILLIE LOU WATTS: “I agreed to be a judge last year.  But I was not allowed to vote for best actor because we had two for our cast were nominees – Larry (Haines) and Michael (Nouri).  I might be biased toward them.  I also could not vote in best actress, since Mary (Stuart) was nominated.  I could only vote in categories where I had no personal attachments.  The only problem about the daytime awards is that the great test of a performer on a daytime show is how well he performs all year long.  You can’t judge that unless you have someone who monitors it every week.  They have increased it from judging just one scene to three, but…” VAL DUFOUR: “I resent the Daytime Emmy Awards and will have anything to do with them, as long as were presented in the daytime, with stuffed animals, instead of at night. I’m a member of AFTRA (American Federation of Television and Radio Artists), Screen Actors Guild (SAG) and Equity (the theater union) and I want the work I do represented with other member of my profession.  As far as I am concerned, they are an insult to the actor.  Number one, they (Academy members) don’t even begin to understand how to decide or judge, to say nothing of the fact the whole premise is phony, because it’s a bought, political thing.  If you can get together 25 votes, then they’ll nominate you.  They have advised us not to put up any actor, unless he or she’s known for anything else, because we’ll be wasting our votes!  Now how do you like that!?  Another thing, where does he good performer come in?  It’s a different thing if you have a 2 ½ hour picture and you’re discussing this actor and only that performance – how can you do this on a soap?  The worst actor in the world can be brilliant in one scene – it has to be looked at in a broader scope; you have to get a continuity of an actor’s performance on a soap.  The Daytime Emmy’s are a raunchy, cheap marketplace that has nothing to do with the honor that should be placed on a beautiful performance.” MORGAN FAIRCHILD: “I’m very apolitical and consider the whole thing very political.  And I think anybody on the soaps realizes this.” MICHAEL NOURI: “I have mixed feelings about it.  Having been nominated for one was very flattering and having been nominated, I like that part.  But there’s something farcical about it: the Academy Awards, all awards. People are judged on the basis of one performance, which says nothing about somebody’s overall character portrayal.  I have seen some people come in for just a one-short.  I can sense how really good they are, but because of their nervousness, they’re just not relaxed enough to get to what they have to offer.  So the criterion for the awards is off-base, I think.” TOM KLUNIS: “In a way I think it’s good and gives recognition to the actor and the medium.  I think possibly it’s commercially necessary…” MARIE (MAREE) CHEATHAM: “That’s not high on my list of feelings.  How can you judge…If a performer is consistently fine and does something very interesting with very little material…that’s the trick in daytime.” LEWIS ARLT: “No comment.” MILLIE TAGGART: “I think the award for the male performer who won last year’s award was the most valid award ever given.  I can’t judge for any others, but Larry is a wonderful, wonderful actor-he’s the best that I’ve ever known.” JOHN CUNNINGHAM: All such awards are really invalid because the only way could really judge whose better for that year, would be if everybody contesting then played the same part. Because to say an apple is better than an orange is crazy. You just can’t do that.  That’s why George C. Scott was right to turn down his Oscar.  Somebody has to stand up every so often and say it’s a lot of crap.” MILLIE TAGGART: “You can have a wonderful story one year, while someone else is vacuuming…” JOEL HIGGINS: “It’s a very loaded question at this time because there is a furor raging between L.A. and New York about the whole thing and when it gets to the point, it’s silly.  You’re no longer awarding someone because they’re the best…You’re awarding them because they live in L.A. or New York.  I’m sure anyone who has ever won is talented.  But I think there are so many talented people-how you can possibly say this person’s better than that? It depends on the character, what they get to play…a million things. Stack the Emmy’s up against the Pulitzer Prize, where it’s not a group of nominees and only one winner.  They say, “We’re going to give 12 of them this year, because these were all good achievements.”” PETER SIMON: “Ludicrous, absolutely ludicrous.” COURTNEY SHERMAN: “I hate the idea.  Talk about various aspects of the business, the daytime drama is definitely a field unto itself; there really is a repertory company feeling here.  I don’t think it is ever to any one’s advantage to have competition for awards.  As dignified as everyone may act about it, I think it’s destructive and silly.  It’s different with a play or movie-they’re entities unto themselves, but I find the Emmys offensive. PETER SIMON: “The process of selection is all done on the number of friends you have for votes.  And this ridiculous competition now between the two coasts, as to where the Emmys are going to be handed out.  I mean, what are they talking about? In a soap, where does the performance end? There are certain people in the shows who have all the gravy and other really fine actors who do nothing but the drudgery.  The categories in soaps should be best recap, best getting through a scene without fainting…” COURTNEY SHERMAN: “Not that you can’t be a fine actor sitting and drinking coffee, but is that the scene you’re going to give to the board of judges?” Obviously a lot about the Emmys have changed since 1976.  But a lot has stayed the same as well.  Too many fine actors, both in Daytime and Primetime have NEVER been nominated.  Whole shows are ignored while others are nominated year after year.  Love of Life was only nominated for ONE acting award, and that was for Shepperd Strudwick, who has previously been nominated.  This year in primetime, Ted Lasso (an excellent show) got many nominations as it has every year, but Ghosts has been ignored again.  Different shows, but both excellent. What is your opinion?  
    • very danceable theme song https://x.com/iammskye1/status/1923509048416043443
    • You are not. I'm so happy that this storyline for Anita is finally showing movement. 
    • A shame that Santa Barbara lost the Andrades but I wonder what the Dobsons had in mind for them. From what I know of the Joe/Kelly situation, they didn't seem to know what to do with the Perkins. I don't think McConnell in particular gets enough acclaim for what she added to the show.  The Dobsons (from what I know of the show) didn't seem to know what to do with Augusta. This was especially true on their second go around but that was also Rauch getting back at her, so who knows?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy