Jump to content

RUMOR REPORT: YR Fires Vet!!!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

This is unfortunate, but I honestly don't think it will make a huge difference. As much as I love Davidson, I've never viewed Ashley Abbott as a lead on Y&R in the entire time I've been watching. She's certainly more expendable than MTS, Stafford, Walton or even Cooper.

But if Y&R wanted to cut a big salary, why not start with Genie Francis, who was an epic fail from the beginning, Greg Rikaart, who hasn't had a storyline that hasn't flopped since about 2006, or even Sharon Case, whose character has been ruined so much it's laughable (not that there was much to ruin in the first place)?

I hope Davidson goes back to B&B. Brad Bell actually seemed to know how to write for her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 161
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Guess that means Eve Plumb is out of another job.

Because MAB & Co. clearly don't watch their own show and therefore have no idea what isn't working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I LOVE ED on Y&R, believe me. But she's FAR more needed at DAYS and her talents would be put to much better use there on a much happier set. A long-term storyline with mini arcs involving Kristen, Stefano, Marlena, and John is just what the show needs. I say go for it!

As for Y&R, ya'll know the drum I'm beating.

BRING BACK BRENDA EPPERSON as THE REAL ASHLEY ABBOTT!!!

and Mark Collier as her love interest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Try Steve Kent & Co, AKA SONY. I blame MAB/Sheffer/Hamner for most of the writing decisions I see on the show.

But Casting Issues (and UN-Casting issues for that matter) I think mostly boil down to SONY and their tight pockets, not to mention their lack of knowledge about what works on Y&R.

Because, frankly, Davidson and Ashley are one of VERY FEW things that are working with the show right now and there are at least 25-30 people I'd fire before her. Hell, I can think of 6 people that could go right now and free up the money for Davidson, a Kimberlin Brown return, and a Victoria Rowell return.

Seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But try to look at it as something that could actually work out two fold:

Eileen can return to DAYS ( as Kristen ONLY .....at first.......with some doses of Susan here and there) and be just what the show needs to experience a ratings spike. In fact, I think that Eileen Davidson is the only actress that could return to a show right now and actually have a MAJOR impact on ratings. It's not just the Kristen character, but what Kristen can do for people like John, Marlena, Roman, Stefano, EJ, Billie, Laura (if they chose to bring her back), Jennifer......the list goes on and on. I truly believe Eileen could and would save DAYS.

Secondly, start campaigning for Brenda Epperson to return to Y&R as Ashley. She made a FABULOUS Ashley and I truly believe this decision is based solely on money and a desire for ED to go back to DAYS and not at all about wanting Ashley off the canvas (like it was with LML).. Let's face it, Epperson would come A LOT cheaper than Davidson, has the appeal and charm to win over fans who never saw her work and appease the outrage of those who have watched Y&R through Ashley's entire run. In FACT, I plan on Facebooking Brenda tomorrow (we chat now & then) and telling her to get her people on it & fast. Instead of writing Ashley a permanent exit story, they could write her one that's short term and bring Epperson back in. Plus, I'd be curious to see her chemistry with Nichols (although I do think he had it in spades with Davidson).

Look at the positives Cat and I'm sorry, but I just don't see ED or Ashley going to B&B as a positive. With the cast of characters that show has now and the youth-oriented stories they're focusing on, they'd Lesli Kay the hell out of ED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's always so nice to see the Brenda Epperson fans around! I loved her as Ashley and she will always be my favorite. And this is the right time for a comeback since passnum1 has been putting her episodes on Youtube. I don't think I'd want to see her at Y&R these days but if there is a campaign I hope she gets hired at Y&R or somewhere. If I was on Twitter I'd do that campaign some DAYS fans are doing.

Marcy needs to exorcise that set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I appreciate your take on the subject.

ED has always been "my" Ashley. Confession: I took a break from Y&R when Brenda Epperson was in the role. So the only person I can relate to as this character is Davidson. I will go to YouTube to watch Epperson's work in order to get a better appreciation.

I honestly think ED deserves better than that hokey, false-teeth nonsense, but if she came back as Kristen only, I think she would be a shot in the arm to that show. So far, the only returns that have been a success for me have been Dee Hall and Lisa Rinna.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Epperson was my first Ashley as well. There was a very lovable and sweet quality to her take on the character that I don't find in Davidson's (who I love as well).

I really couldn't see Epperson's Ashley acting out spermgate or most of Ashley's recent stories.

While I think Davidson is the definitive Ashley, I think Epperson did breathe new life into the character for a while and her take was just as popular during her years on the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd be fine with Epperson as Ashley as well. When I started watching Y&R when I was young, that's actually who was in the role anyways. As much as it pisses me off they fired Davidson before about 15 others who needed to go first, DAYS needs her more than Y&R does at the moment and Epperson was a fine Ashley back in the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually just IMed Brenda on Facebook and it was the first she'd heard it (she's been out of the soap scene for quite a bit, so no surprise there). She asked if it could be a ploy, as some actors do that, but I assured her that it wasn't, that ED was gone, and it's more than likely about money than it is about the Ashley character. That said, she said she would phone Braeden tomorrow, get the story as he knows it, and go from there. Her initial response was to remind me that there "is an Ashley" which I informed her there was not. I also told her that her name had been brought up on some of the boards as who people would like to see take over the part. Who knows if it'll happen, but at least it's been put out there into the universe. I for one would LOVE to see it happen.

And I'd call her far more than "serviceable" as Ashley. Just because she softened Ashley's bitchier side some doesn't mean she wasn't Ashley and didn't make the character her own because she did, sometimes with better results and performances than we ever would have gotten out of Davidson as Ashley (especially when you consider this period of her career- Awkward & miscast as SB's Kelly, and generic and seemingly out of place during the first couple years of her DAYS run).

Though I might agree we may not see her lead a story again, but how long has it been since Eileen has actually lead a story as Ash? It didn't happen under LML and it certainly hasn't happened under this regime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Too bad she ended up on Y&R. Actress Valarie Pettiford might've been "Sharon" because she sings too and does it pretty well.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • @NothinButAttitude thanks for sharing the rough draft. I had bought "Shadows on the Wall" from Kathryn Leigh Scott's website probably 20+ years ago. It's a fascinating read into a very different version of what the show could have been. 
    • @Efulton That's the quote I was refering to. In the bible, at almost the beginning, Rueben and C.C. were compared as being similar as two fathers wanting everything for their children, or something along those lines. I do think the Andrades were intended to have more of a role, but they never even garnered a family set (just Santana's apartment). In 1991, they added the Capwell kitchen which seemed to be a domestic space for Rosa, but clearly not solely Rosa's. I feel like I remember Rosa confronting Santana about her feelings for C.C. being an attempt to recreate her grand fantasy with Channing, Jr. in the kitchen, but more likely that was the bedroom Santana was redecorating (C.C.'s master suite) utilizing the designsshe had envisioned for herself and Channing, Jr.  
    • On the French Santa Barbara site Ismael Carlo did not hold back about how he felt about the Dobsons. http://santabarbara-online.com/index2.htm How did you start in Santa Barbara ? My recollection is that I auditioned for the role. After a couple of weeks of contract negotiations I was told that all was in order and that I would start work in a couple of weeks or so. But that's when the sh*t hit the fan. In her high petulant way she (Bridget Dobson) commenced to tell me how all her South American workers were beholding to her. How she treated them, "like children". I said to her, "I'm not a child". She got upset and started to cry. I told her that if she did not want me on the show, all she had to do was break the contract and pay me. It never happened. The Dobsons, who were the producers, where a pair of what you would call in your country aristocrats in their minds. I almost quit just before I started. But like any actor at the time I stuck it out all because of the work. I don't think I will ever sell my soul again. I was also able to perform with the lead actor and director in a production of his: Romeo & Juliet. I played Papa Capulet.
    • It's kismet – I was just thinking about Azure C the other day and revisited some of the press from that era. Reading it now, it’s undeniably cringeworthy how often the articles emphasized that the actress was a cisgender woman. It wasn’t framed as a critique of The City for not casting a trans actress—it felt more like a reassurance to viewers that, yes, the storyline involved transgender themes, but they weren’t actually going to show anything. ABC ran an ad in TV Guide that teased that Azure would confess her past – that she “was once a he” – to her love interest Bernardo. Rather than focusing on thoughtful representation, the press framed the twist as a dramatic surprise for audiences, to capitalize on shock value.  It was clearly not treated like other social issues had been on ABC Daytime. Of course, the irony is that the only actual protests came from GLAAD over ABC's ignorance, rather than anyone from the right as they feared.
    • Having seen what Long did with Mason and Julia on SB, I can't see Long ever being able to write a fun/lightweight story for Nola and Quint. 
    • The Azure C. plot is during the early days of "The City" when it still is, quite frankly, not very good. And when it gets better, there is still such a hostile quality to material than even enjoyable material like the Gino/Tracey engagement party lacks the humanity it should.  Something that I don't think is mentioned much, and I feel is noteable is that the sex scene between Azure and Bernardo is played as the climax to a long romantic build up complete with a musical montage to the Eagles' "Love Will Keep Us Alive." Bernardo's reaction is absolutely awful, but I think the reveal was meant as a stumbling block to their relationship. I'm not sure exactly where they would have gone with them, but I would have had Azure accused of being Jared Chase's murderer because he was involved in outing her (Malcolm may have as well). I would have used this to reunite Azure and Bernardo, who believed in her innocence. It may have played too closely to the trope that trans people are deviants so I would have made sure it was clearly that she was being falsely accused.  For your research, Tony Cardello (an offscreen character) was the gay son of a mob boss, Vince Cardello, on the CBN serial "Another Life." He's referenced as gay in a couple episodes in early December 1981. The references are very negative. In the summer of 1982, Tony is said to be arriving soon with his mother Louise, but they never materialize as there is a change in writers. 
    • I've always considered that Paul Avila Mayer was hired by Ellen on her way out the door, but I also wondered if NBC was trying to keep Mayer in their writers' stable after he failed to work out on "Santa Barbara."  Mayer and Braxton were fined for writing during the strike. I believe there is an article mentioning it somewhere in this thread.  I don't hate Mayer and Braxton's run. I found Jeanne Glynn's run very dry in what I've seen until about her final month or so when she starts to focus on the reveal that T.R. is the lost Rebecca Kendall. Mayer and Braxton didn't always have amazing stories, but I found the characterization was deeper (if not always true to who the person had been). There were some scenes I really enjoyed.  The misogyny comment is interesting and is something I hadn't considered. I found the tail end of Braxton and Mayer's run interesting when the all male board at Tourneur Instruments gave Liza grief for shacking up with Hogan, which seemed to be broaching the subject in a way that showed it was wrong. I will say, however, there is a scene much earlier in their run where Liza starts to think of herself as aging because of having a teenage daughter that now makes me lean to agree with you.  I thought Liza and Hogan had nice chemistry and I loved the fact that Hogan was clearly more into Liza than Liza was into Hogan. Sunny's fate in that story was awful. Sunny rarely had good stories once Hogan left the first time.  Bassett played Selina McCulla, a nurse who worked at the Riverfront Clinic. Her brother was Joseph Phillips' Cruiser McCulla, who was Ryder's pal. They were introduced in early 1985 by Jeanne Glynn and written out very quickly in Braxton and Mayer's run. Cruiser got a formal write out; he was sent off to study computers out of town. Selina appeared at the clinic in some situation after Cruiser left and then was never seen or mentioned again.  I want to say they sent TR off to college, but a later post says she went to Switzerland. I think Krakowski was in some play at the time. Maybe it was Starlight Express. The chemistry is still there for me in October, 1985, when Hogan and Sunny are investigating the poisoned water storyline that dovetails back into Hogan / Liza / Lloyd.  I am a Gary Tomlin apologist but his second run is frenetic, not always in a good way.  Evie was probably going to be revealed to be someone's daughter. Stone was her stepfather, wasn't he? I don't think introducing a younger female from the lower class was a bad idea, but I don't know if I would have gone with Evie / Quinn. I was briefly intrigued by the chemistry test between Adair and Ryder.  I don't mind Jeffrey Meek, but I find him very attractive so maybe I am biased in my appreciation of his work.  I definitely felt the Kendall reset in October with Chase going to the paper and the mystery of San Marcos leading to Estelle and the return of Steve. I don't like Lloyd Bautista much as an actor, but he would have been better off playing Martin Tourneur by that point but not as a crime boss. When does John Whitsell takeover? Is it November? When I watched these episodes a few years back, October, November, and December seemed like almost three different shows. November was a glaring jump from the material Tomlin started to set up in October and by December it seemed like everything from October was gone.  Stephanie / Wendy / Bela is a horrid story. I thought the initial concept of the story was smart (Wendy trying to prove that Bela was a cad by luring him into bed but I couldn't see Wendy actually falling for Bela). The only direction I would have accepted was a Stephanie / Wendy / Bela story that ended with both women murdering Bela and getting away with it.  I didn't know they had already set up Liza's exit. Thanks for sharing a new detail. I struggle to watch the November-December 1986 episodes when they are online. It just seems like such a different show. I don't think the decision about T.R. was that noble. I think it was clear that Jane Krakowski wasn't staying and Robert Reed as Lloyd wasn't going to work out.  I think the show wanted to go full steam ahead with Evie / Cagney and Suzi was considered expendable.  Tomlin was writer for both Sarah's death and Patti's arrival. I don't know if the producer change had happened yet or which producer approved those decisions. I'm pretty sure Nicholson was out in November at some point. Sarah's death is the impetus for Patti's return; she comes back to Henderson to find her daughter's murderer.  I think details get lost to history. For years, Tracey's existence was never mentioned on soap opera message boards when I first started. Interesting, Sarah Whiting was also rarely mentioned and I am not sure Michelle Joyner is listed in cast lists for most of the soap books that cover the final years of "Search for Tomorrow." I cannot remember if Tracey was mentioned from the beginning. I know she is mentioned by July, 1985, when Sarah is at the McCleary family dinner. I think Kate asks Sarah about her family and she mentions her sister and brother.  I think Sarah's adoption was mentioned only under Tomlin, but I might be wrong on that. I feel like it was stated by Jo in explaining to Suzi (or maybe someone else) about why Sarah had a constant need for approval.  Lundquist didn't work for me as Steve, but I was disappointed how quickly Steve was dumped a second time.  I have never understood why the show dropped Phillip Brown as Steve or why there wasn't an immediate recast given the importance of the character to the narrative. Clearly, it was a Ellen Barrett issue because Tomlin brings Steve back less than two months into his 1985 return.  I think the shift to the twins, Chase and Alec, was probably to skew the show younger and keep Lloyd involved as there was part two of the Kendall vs. Tourneur/Sentell story to play out with Travis and Liza raising a Kendall. Originally, from what I've pieces together, it looked like Adair was the mother of Elan and one of the Kendall boys was the father. I wonder what this meant was the plan for T.R. or if she and Elan were both intended to be Kendalls, which would have been overkill.   I agree that the deconstruction of the Wendy / Quinn / Sarah story was a mistake. I think Tomlin leaned into one of his favorite tropes (turning the uninspired heroine into the bad girl) and used it with Sarah, though it seemed like Mayer and Braxton may have already been heading in that direction. I didn't love the music angle of the story all that much, but I loved that it pitted Quinn against Chase and I would have enjoyed that rivalry a bit more. When did Quinn become Stephanie's assistant? Was that under Tomlin? I thought that was a smart move.  I think Stephanie/Wendy/Bela is one of the worst story choices. When Stephanie called Wendy a slut, I was like we've reached a point where I no longer recognize anyone involved.  The Suzi / Wendy stuff falls apart very early in Mayer / Braxton as I think Jeanne Glynn was gearing up for a longer Wendy / Suzi custody suit over Jonah as Suzi's mental health continued to collapse. I felt Braxton and Mayer even hinted that they might go with Wendy pursuing Cagney for a moment, but instead we got Wendy / Quinn / Sarah, which I really liked. I felt Sarah being the Jo's granddaughter and a manipulator against Wendy's more mature and adult complicated heroine was an interesting choice that should have been allowed to play longer.  I felt that Jeanne Glynn built a lot of potential, but never really lit the match and was able to use it in stories. That may be because she didn't have enough time. I felt her last month or so was very solid and was finally going somewhere after mostly not going anywhere. Justine's departure didn't bother me. They had played a lot of Justine / Chase as well and Wendy / Alec. There was a lot of building of foundation, but the story never got anywhere.  The shifts in story are remarkable and depressing to consider. Lots of the potential was intriguing, it just rarely reached a productive stage because, as you have said, a writer or a producer was always coming in and making their mark. 
    • Just had a random thought that Vanessa Bell Calloway would be good casting for Sharon (The Articulette who hung up on Anita). She usually plays nice, but if you saw the Temptations biopic you'll remember she was pretty good playing that crooked manager that ripped them off. She might also sing because in Polly and Polly Comin' Home her character sang but I can't tell if it was a dub or not. Lastly, she did AMC and DAYS for short stints so she is no stranger to soaps.
    • I don't know if this counts for you but Bill Bell did a terrible short plot with an overweight character (Joann) who tried to French kiss Kay Chancellor.....if you google you'll find a link called Lezwatch.tv that has an article about it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy