Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of April


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Which is why I said that, GH was spared, in part, because of Cartini's involvement in that otherwise comatose soap. The Revolution's failure definitely was another reason why GH was spared (for now).

That said, this show sure wouldn't have been saved if the likes of Guza (or the person that replaced him) had been at the helm. The fact that Cartini's name is attached to this shitshow is why this show is living to see another day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only reason it was spared due to Cartini had nothing to do with crossovers. Show me where they have helped improve performance. Since Ron has taken over GH has now hit .8 twice in the 18 to 49 demo. Something that happened only once before. I will acknowledge Valentini who probably got the budget under control which helped it survive but at the end of the day it was the Revolutions failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Revolution's failure is the only reason that GH was given a reprieve. GH's demos are horrible, but The Revolution's were worse. You could give Katie's talk show some credit for motivating ABC to give it a slightly better lead in. However, RC and FV get no credit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Both factors was what ultimately saved this show. Cartini's brilliant ploy to get rightfully outraged OLTL viewers to watch GH (in spite of the fact that some of these viewers ran away from the latter soap because it sucked sweaty eczema balls) had plenty to do with why this show is lasting longer than it should've.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The failure of that talk show is one reason out of many, as is Cartini's involvement with this show. The only thing that I'll give Katie credit for is treading lightly in introducing her talk show, as she's been around long enough to know how to play things in her favor so that she isn't unfairly blamed (as the castmembers of both The Chew and The Revolution were) for killing off AMC and OLTL.

When GH finally dies its overdue death, it will be because of the long reign of incompetence that was Guza/JFP/Frons' run. Period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly.

Where is the proof that Cartini's involvement helped to save the show? I'm not seeing anything reflected in the ratings.

Message boards are not a good sample of the general viewing audience. OLTL's hardcore fans have not been checking into GH, at least not in significant amounts. Viewership continues to decrease.

Most of the hardcore OLTL fans could probably care less about characters from their canceled soap crossing over for all we know, and so far, that seems to be the case outside of some fans on message boards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Funny how when GH vets Tristan Rogers and Emma Samms returned, GH garnered the highest ratings (2.0). When they left, ratings went back down. Hmm. Personally, I think ratings would be higher if they just stuck with bringing back the iconic GH vets and didn't bring on the OLTL characters. Focus the money and storyline on GH characters - not OLTL characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The brilliant ploy that got people to tune in to a show that they otherwise wouldn't given the time of day to.

As for "fangurling" for Cartini, well, it's no different than the I-Hate-OLTLers Kool-Aid that many seem to be drunk off of.

Whatever canvas that would've served the true GH vets like Robert and Holly as they should've been is dead and has been for years before Cartini came along. What's left is a malnourished shadow of what used to be a great soap, so no, I'm not buying the myth that Cartini is the reason why the vets have not been regarded as they should at all.

If this were a great soap that got sidelined by the arrival of characters from another soap, I'd have no problem falling in line with SON groupthink in believing that Cartini ruined this show. Since it isn't and hasn't been since the beginning of the new millennium, I have and will continue to state that fact instead of getting on the Cartini Sucks bandwagon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy