Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of March


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Carl, I completely agree and see what you're saying about Anna. As poorly written as Robert's return was, at least we got to see his perspective. People actually cared about his well being. The same can't be said for Anna. I thought Finola Hughes did a smashing job in every scene she was in, but she was merely supporting other characters. I want to see somebody supporting Anna and I want to hear her perspective. Anna and Patrick should have the lion share of screentime right now, in terms of this story.

I'm curious if Anna sticks around if they'll do anything with her. They certainly don't seem inspired to write for her now, but I think she could be a great asset. Finola is reminding me of why she got me hooked on AMC years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Anna doesnt need supporting. She is coming across as very strong and holding things together and she's done so for Patrick and Emma. People rallying behind her as they are with Robert wouldnt make sense bc she isnt a mess and on the verge of a breakdown the way he is. She has her emotions in check and has internalized her grief. I think the way she's reacted with everyone else is perfect. As a viewer, all I want is one private scene with her alone and just breaking down and having one big cry which fades to black. She doesnt need to do that in public for everyone to see and start consoling her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When I say I want people supporting Anna, I mean that I want her to be the focus of the scenes and the other actors should be supporting her in that way. I don't mean that I want the other characters supporting her, because Anna is a very strong and independent woman. She also has already lost a daughter so I'd expect her to be lashing out in some way. I do feel that should've at least come up at some point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right. To be honest I don't even know if she's coming across that strongly. Luke did all the work with Robert, and she watched helplessly as he merrily abandoned her and their grandchild before Robin's funeral. She asked Liz to take care of the funeral. Patrick seems to be holed away somewhere. So, they aren't exactly having Anna as this force.

I don't remember RC writing any strong women on OLTL - I think Anna is just a mystery to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My position on this whole "Anna's Thoroughly Odd Grieving Process" storyline is the fact that it just doesn't seem true. For decades, we've been told that, especially on ABC soaps, there is NO bond greater than a mother and child -- and no fate worse than a parent outliving their child. Now, when it comes time to put that to the test, Anna's calm and stoic, wiping a single tear from her cheek. I can't blame Finola or the direction simply because THE SCENES AREN'T WRITTEN TO ACCOMMODATE ANYTHING ELSE! Now, I'm not saying it's right or wrong, but it definitely seems odd. Add that to Robert's piss poorly written Grief in 60 Seconds or Less and it just makes no sense that the parents of a dead woman seem so... blase. Unless they're planning on pulling off an 11th hour hat trick and give Anna her "moment" as she throws herself onto Robin's casket at the funeral (while proofreading this sentence, I quickly saw 'Baskin Robbins') , I really don't see the point in them being here. This, to me, has all the impact of Mac getting a throwaway line, "Anna's distraught she couldn't make Robin's funeral -- she's stacked over O'Hare."

Well, much like last year with Jake's death, the death of someone's child is all about The Men and their Egos. Robert's not distraught that his daughter was burned to death. Heavens, no! He's distraught that he couldn't "save" her. A case of bruised ego. Give Robert another child to save, his ego's immediately healed and he's got a glint in his eye and a spring in his step.

If Kate becoming a schizophrenic whore and Carly stripping down to her bra and panties in the middle of a hospital are any indications of this dude's perception self-proclaimed strong female characters... we're in a for a treat! Tee hee! dry.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's a tragedy that Laura Wright is probably one of the strongest actresses GH has. When she was chewing out Kelly Monaco's Sam over 'what Jason would want' I just thought it was unreal that GH has isolated, fired, killed off every single one of their strong female leads over the last couple of years. The piss poor thing about the writing is I can't even argue with her. That is what Jason would want and then I hated the fact that I cared enough to give her that much room in the first place.

I go back and forth on Anna, I think she is great when she is around other people, but I also think she shouldn't be this glass mirror who's grief is only seen as a reflection of other characters emotions. Finola Hugh's is awesome and she's given every scene exactly what they are worth. Her scenes with Robert, Patrick and Luke were probably the best thing about the last few weeks. I can't say that I've been unsatisfied with her performance. I am just unsatisfied with the way the entire storyline is written and positioned. I just wish there was a greater sense of loss. These people all seem so fragmented and insular. It's so oddly edited that none of the shows storylines really mesh well together. You never feel like the scenes in an episode are happening on the same show. You have one scene about Robin's death then another scene about Carly boning Johnny, then another scene with Kate/Connie switching back and forth then you have the OLTL crew and nothing seems coherent or cohesive enough for me to feel much of anything. That being said I actually do like KDP, she makes Micheal watchable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Great post. ITA. I was expecting so much more from the vet returns but I was hugely disappointed again. The writing for Robert and Holly has been horrific. Did no one see them in the 80s? WTH? Anna has been slightly better but not by much. And this Luke propping only irritates me and makes me hate Luke more. And why bring up Ethan's paternity if they weren't going to change it? It truly boggles my mind. I guess I can say goodbye to GH - again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Michael says he can relate to Starr bc he wants justice for Abby's death. Um wasnt she killed accidentally by a crane?

I cant beleive Im saying this considering I cant stand either character, but Todd and Carly seem to work well together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That, along with "What does Sonny do, walk around in a bathrobe?", were the highlights of today's episode.

OT: Does anyone know how to use the spoiler feature? I realized that I've posted a few in this thread before and I don't want to be inconsiderate of anyone else, but I honestly don't know how to post one. Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @chrismlAbout Lisa, agree to disagree. Actually at the time she was the only thing my partner & I disagreed about. Naturally she was Team Vicky while I was steadfast as Team Lisa.  About John & twin paternity, I think that like the 3 pillows was a transitory idea someone had that no one else agreed with. More of the attempt to accommodate Philece. About MJ, co-sign, 100% agree, if there were more degrees I would claim them. About Wally & Felicia, always a fan. Mitch? Eh, take or leave. Although I do agree that WGE is a really striking man. Who have I left out? I don't know so that's all I got.
    • RIP Wayne Lewis.

      Please register in order to view this content

      (he sings near the end of the episode) https://deadline.com/2025/06/wayne-lewis-dead-atlantic-starr-founder-singer-1236426870/
    • Dallas peaked early, IMO. Maybe not a fair statement as I’m still making my way through the first half of its run, but I think it’s hard to argue to point that S3 into S4 was its high point. Back to Knots. Wrapping up “And Never Brought to Mind.” Greg’s introduction kinda took me by surprise. I low-key dreaded his arrival bc I know he very quickly gets to the center of the show, but even though they wasted no time connecting him with Mac, Abby, Gary, and Karen, it still feels like a gradual intro. The juxtaposition of the ending of the Chip story with the heating up Abby’s plotting is quite symbolic of the changes the show was going through. I absolutely cannot imagine Kenny and Ginger having any part in any of this. Yall, the Gary/Val piano theme that they pull out from time to time is my FAVORITE. I find myself humming it constantly.
    • Bloodshed is inevitable now. It’s another reason I’m glad Black people aren’t getting involved in these protests. As awful as this is, I keep reminding myself that 54 percent of Latino men voted for Trump. These people were put in harm’s way by members of their own communities and sometimes even members of their own families. Too many people decided to touch the stove.
    • Maybe I'm still in denial, but nothing about Neighbours' ongoing social media output gives the vibe of a show that's ending. In today's 'Roundup' video, Alan Fletcher referenced that production finishes in five weeks, but in all the show's posts the cast are as jovial and lighthearted as ever. Remarkably so for people who are about to lose their jobs.    Perhaps they're just putting a brave face on things, and I know they approached the previous axing with a positive attitude. Maybe putting an upbeat face on things is a collective way of showing potential backers that there's still life in the show? Or is it possible that they already know the show has been saved, and we'll get an announcement next month when filming wraps and the show 'rests'?   Does any of that make sense?!
    • A very good week for male eye candy on GH. New Michael is beautiful, Curtis's arms looked great in that polo shirt, Cody looks even more handsome with his new haircut AND we got Marco in swim shorts rocking his lovely bod and chest fur. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Yeah when Jamey Giddens did breakdowns for DAYS, he would sometimes state in tweets that specific things were his idea that he had pitched to Ron.
    • I don't, since they've clearly incorporated them into Tomas' storyline, and I happen to like his tattoos, but his jackets not fitting doesn't mean they're trying to cover his tattoos. The clothing overall isn't the issue; it's the fit. And I expect(ed) more from Jeresa Featherstone and her team. Very disappointed. He's the only male, overall, whose costume irritates me.
    • "And OMG, watching the scenes of Roger's return in comparison...the quality in the writing really nosedived. The stupid mask." Very much agreed.  Having Roger hide behind a mask for weeks/months, with it culminating with him swinging in on a vine at Blake/Phillip's wedding....geez.  So juvenile. IMO, Guiding Light never did a good job reintroducing major characters, either from the dead or elsewhere.  Masked balls = awful.  Amish = awful. When Reva was brought back from the dead, she should've just showed up in Springfield as Reva, and informed everyone that she had been gone for years because she felt like it.  She had a four-year fling with some dude who ended up dumping her due to disloyalty. Josh would be pissed and declare that their love is not *always* but *sometimes* and he'd act accordingly.  Her kids would hate her.   
    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy