Jump to content

Y&R: Discussion for the Month of December


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I thought the episode was really good! Loved the flashbacks and seeing Quinn as Nick Reed, and Casey. I also thought that was a pretty neat twist to have the angel be Nikki's mother.

I also loved the Douglas reference, but i feel if they wanted to kill him offscreen it should have been mentioned.

I choked up during that one Nikki and Katherine (great to have Jeanne back BTW!) flashback, i assume that's when Rex was killed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 252
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

After reading some of the positive comments I decided to watch. Probably the first episode I watched all the way through in years and years.

The flashbacks were well chosen, especially that scene where Casey shamed Nikki, which I hadn't seen before and which was very effective. Nikki's sense of worthlessness and failure are usually only ever addressed when those clever writers need to tell us again that Nikki used to be a stripper. I'd like to say this will be a positive change...anyway, at least this was finally an episode which was actually based on a character's past that viewers have seen. One of the many reasons the Chompers and Adam episodes were so hollow was down to their tantrums being based on rewritten history, most of which was never seen.

Poor Jeanne. I'm glad she was able to be back for this.

The old "let's pray because it's Christmas" routine is Bill Bell through and through, but the main difference is the lack of integrity most of these characters have. To see Sharon and Nick, both worthless whores without a brain in their heads, who exploit and neglect their children, "praying" for Victor...it made me nauseous.

The scenes with Nikki crying for her mother were pure cheese but MTS was born for that type of scene. The last scene was also very moving.

The previews - Daniel seems to be trapped in the year 1996 with every damn hairstyle he has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL at Sharon telling Victor that men controlling/telling women what to do ended three decades ago and he proceeds to steer her away from Adam, moments after he tried to force Nikki back into rehab. This whole Nick ultimatum is just offensive - he's no better than Adam when it comes to keeping Faith away from Sharon. The writer are really off-the-mark on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know. I love Adam, but if I had an ex who was hanging out with a sociopath, I'm not sure I'd want him having access to our child either. I don't want to believe that Adam would hurt Faith again, but he is responsible for that child being ripped from two mothers already. I'm not sure he would hesitate to use Faith as a pawn again if he finds himself hurt or pissed, so I see where Nick is coming from, even though I think he's a smug ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Almost every character was badly damaged by this writing regime, but Sharon is just on a whole new level of destruction. I used to like this character, even back in 2008, but now honestly I wish she wasn't around. Adam is still an obnoxiously stupid character.

That's just two characters; don't even get me started on the other 80% of the cast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Adam's kidnapping Faith was BAD, but, his telling Sharon that her baby was born so badly deformed that he had it cremated to spare her was WORSE. Seeing these two together is not only disgusting it is offensively nauseating. IMO TIIC had a chance to do a type of Stockholm Syndrome story with these two but blew it BIG TIME.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Right. Literally for decades, soaps mesmerized their audiences with tales of romance, family conflict, class struggles, and recognizable interpersonal-relationship sagas. We didn't need relentless, heavy violence. We didn't need clones, mad scientists, extra-terrestrials and demon possessions. We didn't need gaggles of plastic himbos and bimbos pushing beloved vets off-screen. We only needed to see people whom we cared about, and the intelligent, moving progression of their lives. Flashy sets, gaudy gimmicks, and high-falutin' hairdos be damned. The characters and the words were important.
    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
    • OMG...Robert Mandan! And Donna Mills is a child. I keep hoping for more of early Ross/Vanessa.
    • I get your point, but I also know that if the roles were reversed -- if a man were screwing around on a woman this way -- everyone would be all "All with his head!" When I say Vanessa needs therapy, I'm actually being kind, because I could begin and end with the fact that she's a cheating slut.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy