If it is GH I see some big cast cuts coming. Geary-Elliot-NLG-Rademacher-Big.

50% is huge, they can't safe that much money with cutting little people and they will not cut MB, VM and SB. I also see Edward dying now. And if it is GH that gets the big cut, it is save to assume that the other two soaps got a cut too, we know they all letting people go.

WSJ made mention of Disney's low profit, trouble at ABC, and oddly talked about cuts at ABC Daytime which is but a small fraction of the overall business. If OLTL is always under budget, maybe they are just making the cuts formal and putting them down on paper. This would have no major effect on the show and make the bean counters happy. OLTL already has a huge cast and could use a haircut, anyway. The same is true with GH. A reduced number of shows means a reduced amount of story and I guess less characters will be needed.

BTW, the repeats suck and this weeks 'Hunks' package was silly.

If it is GH I see some big cast cuts coming. Geary-Elliot-NLG-Rademacher-Big.

50% is huge, they can't safe that much money with cutting little people and they will not cut MB, VM and SB. I also see Edward dying now. And if it is GH that gets the big cut, it is save to assume that the other two soaps got a cut too, we know they all letting people go.

I think killing either Sonny, Jason or Carly would give the remaining two a dramatic boost. It doesn't make a difference which one you killed off, there would be huge potential in the remaining 2 corners of the triangle trying to function without the missing third--and it just doesn't work right.

These budget cuts have nothing to do with ratings it is probably more along the lines that ABCD isn't paying the bills any more and Disney money counters are giving Frons less money to throw away. I can honesty believe that they don't care how it's done just that it gets done or like Marceline said ABC daytime will have a whole new look. The cuts are going to come from the show that has a 50% higher budget then the other two, which is probably GH from all the talks which will probably put them more on par with AMC/OLTL. Frons is a business man and it is in his best interest if he keeps all three soaps on the air the moment one fails the other two will follow. The bottom line is if Disney can find a cheaper, successful replacement for one soap they can find it for the other two as well.

And please coming under budget does not in any industry prevent you from getting your budget cut if the higher up feel the need, most likely they will think if you are doing so well with the little you got then you can manage with a little less.

If it is GH I see some big cast cuts coming. Geary-Elliot-NLG-Rademacher-Big.

50% is huge, they can't safe that much money with cutting little people and they will not cut MB, VM and SB. I also see Edward dying now. And if it is GH that gets the big cut, it is save to assume that the other two soaps got a cut too, we know they all letting people go.

Most of the cuts will probably come from production and bts (wardrobe,makeup,etc.) Do they supply meals to the staff if so they probably will consist of a lot of cold food items and salads.

I think it's GH.

WSJ made mention of Disney's low profit, trouble at ABC, and oddly talked about cuts at ABC Daytime which is but a small fraction of the overall business.

Can you provide a link to the article or maybe the time frame when it appeared? I'm not finding it on WSJ.com (Man I hate that site.). So perhaps I'm not searching right. I would love to read it. Thanks!

And please coming under budget does not in any industry prevent you from getting your budget cut if the higher up feel the need, most likely they will think if you are doing so well with the little you got then you can manage with a little less.

That is very true, I can imagine that Frons micromanages OLTL's budget very often because Valentini has seemingly done very well under such circumstances. GH might receive a bigger budget, but the fact that OLTL comes under budget also helps the rest of ABC daytime, as it allows for Frons to send the money saved to either AMC or GH.

As I'm reading this again, most of us have assumed - for good reason - that this is about ABC. Is there any chance this could be about Y&R or B&B? What's their budget picture like? Could any of this have to do with Bloom's exit? Just asking.

As I'm reading this again, most of us have assumed - for good reason - that this is about ABC. Is there any chance this could be about Y&R or B&B? What's their budget picture like? Could any of this have to do with Bloom's exit? Just asking.

I can't imagine it being Y&R or BB. Their demos, and viewership, have been consistent for the past 2 years, and they (or Y&R) just got a 3 year renewal.

I think it's AMC because they've bottomed out in demos for the past 6 months or so and you add in JHC's mismanangement of the budget.

I can't imagine it being Y&R or BB. Their demos, and viewership, have been consistent for the past 2 years, and they (or Y&R) just got a 3 year renewal.

I think it's AMC because they've bottomed out in demos for the past 6 months or so and you add in JHC's mismanangement of the budget.

Thanks. I know that CBS operates very differently than ABC since they lease their shows.

Cutting AMC by 50% would essentially turn it into GL. They might as well cancel it if that's the case.

Cutting AMC by 50% would essentially turn it into GL. They might as well cancel it if that's the case.

I agree, I was saying that at another board. It will basically kill AMC

I think ever since the move to L.A., AMC's budget has seemingly been shrinking, even more since D&D took over. I mean look how they've decreased the number of sets they use every week. The show's cast has dwindled quite much since the move to L.A. I honestly think what we're seeing on screen with AMC is a show that has already gone through budget cuts, so I don't think they could even sustain a 50 percent budget cut.

I think it's GH. There's been so much money thrown at that show, and IMO they have so little to show for it. Perhaps GH's 50 percent budget cut might put it at the same level budget wise that OLTL and AMC are at.

I think it's GH as well. At least GH has a budget to cut, AMC and OLTL doesnt. I swear GH has a new set daily for no friggin' reason whatsoever.

BTW, the repeats suck and this weeks 'Hunks' package was silly.

I don't mind the repeats at all.

Edited January 22, 201114 yr by Marley

Well, this is all pointless speculation with people spinning tales to suit their own particular agendas. And Jamey Giddens can kiss my beautiful, round, voluptuous black ass.

I'm wondering if it's GH, too.

I mean they cut Rebecca Herbst, who has been on for a LONG time. I'm sure she cost a lot more than say...That irish creature.

OLTL cut Brittany Underwood, but how expensive could she be?

AMC cut nobody.

I'm really thinking it's GH.