Jump to content

Dallas 2.0: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think it'll hit me he's gone as the season progresses. I like Bobby as the sole patriarch fighting outsiders, it works for me. The show has good moments and I am sometimes surprised by it, but in a lot of ways, it's lacking.

Oh, anyone wanna see Jesse Metcalfe's new mansion? Ugh.

http://www.celebuzz.com/2013-03-18/from-dallas-to-los-angeles/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Gary and Val were original Dallas characters, regardless of Knots Landing. The first full season of Dallas began by telling their story first. They are very important to the fabric of the show, especially when you consider Lucy was a main character for many years. Their return doesn't need a lot of backstory, that's just an excuse for bad writing. It's simple: Gary is JR and Bobby's brother, Valene is Gary's wife and Lucy is their child. The writers haven't done anything to develop Lucy and this was the perfect opportunity. Basically, this amounted to nothing. At least for Gary and Val, they at least set things up well, but there was no follow through. Their first scene should've been followed with the offscreen Gary/Val reunion and the Sue Ellen/Valene scene suggested an actual story. If they knew this was the only episode they were using Joan for, they should've used that time to put her in a scene with Lucy and/or Gary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I KNOW the backstory, that Lucy lived at Southfork as a teenager, etc., etc. But frankly, I don't care about watching Gary, Val and Lucy because 1. Joan Van Ark looks like a walking corpse and is painful to watch, and 2. She's had so damn much plastic surgery that it's not believable to anyone watching that Lucy is supposed to be her child. Charlene Tilton has aged like a normal woman, and seeing her next to JVA is ridiculous. Lucy's parents look more like her siblings.

I felt like more could have been done with Gary regarding the mineral rights, and maybe that will happen at some point. Lucy has been on before, and they haven't bothered to give her a storyline, so I'm not sure why her parents (who look more like her siblings) showing up would somehow translate to a storyline now. Honestly, Lucy is the only one I wouldn't mind seeing more of going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Like a lot of young parents, the age difference between them and their children seems less and less as they all age, but accepting Val's appearance without factoring in cosmetic surgery is a leap.

I really do enjoy the show but it sometimes feels like the hour isn't quite enough, especially when you toss in a Gary/Val/Lucy when so much else is going on, or they want to devote such large chunks of story to Ann/Emma/Harris/Judith. They occupy any space the original series stars who are reduced to cameos might get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You can tell Charlene is pissed, but doesn't want to be too obvious because she wants to be invited back. However, if you're going to bring anybody back it needs to serve a purpose. Especially for people who have never seen the original. WIthin the context of this show you have no idea who Ray or Lucy are. You think Mandy and Cally were both former wives of JR and you have no idea they really existed on the original, etc. It's just bad writing to bring on characters in such a plot driven fashion and do nothing with them. Even the new characters Cidre creates are poorly developed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. How would new viewers even care about who those people are? I'm not saying I want everyone back leading storylines but the cameos and throwaway lines are more insulting than anything. It was why I thought they could have done much better with JR's farewell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Now they are writing Afton as a troublemaker??...oye.....and when did Sue Ellen start hating Afton again...she treated Mandy better than Afton although we didnt get a scene...these writers suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ellabelle, I am glad someone here has some sense!!

I think they need to give the show 20-25 episodes per season. The old series got away with the character driven stuff because they had more episodes and I think they had more programming time for each episode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dear Cynthia Cidre,

If you are reading this thread please know that you are doing a great job and most of these people have no idea what "contemporary" means if they fell over a 1000 page dictionary with "Contemporary" printed 40 times on each page along with the definition. If I were you I would ask TNT if you can have 20-25 episodes per season so we can have more of your great story and vision. If not, that is fine! I am enjoying Dallas 2.0 more than any TV series right now.

Sincerely,

Allmc2008

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Definition of contemporary
adjective
  • 1living or occurring at the same time:the event was recorded by a contemporary historian
  • dating from the same time:this series of paintings is contemporary with other works in an early style
  • 2belonging to or occurring in the present:the tension and complexities of our contemporary society
  • following modern ideas in style or design:contemporary ceramics by leading potters
noun (plural contemporaries)
  • a person or thing living or existing at the same time as another:he was a contemporary of Darwin
  • a person of roughly the same age as another:my contemporaries at school
Clearly, you haven't watched British television. They "get away with" character driven storyline in series that have 6-10 episodes a year so that excuse is ridiculous.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ummmn...I'm not sure what the definition of "contemporary" has to do with the criticisms of Dallas. It's not an acting showcase by any means. But honestly, neither was the original. And I don't think it's too much to expect that if they bring back familiar characters, that they're written with consideration to their previous "life" or at least given more than a dayplayer's line or two in an episode.

If there's one piece of advice to be given, it's not to waste the goodwill Dallas has. I mean, just hearing the opening chords of the theme song puts a smile on my face. You can't buy that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I do think there's room for optimism, especially with Amazon making enough new episodes to last until December. There's still time for the various players to get their ducks in a row. Guess we'll know soon enough! 
    • I do agree it's better to just have people pop back into town. I never understood why Roger needed a mask on an island, when neither Fletcher or Alex would've known who he was. And the vine...sigh. Couldn't he have just been sent crashing through a window or something?
    • When the announcement was first made, I did wonder if other plans were in the works. I guess we can always keep hoping, especially as the show has a small core cast.
    • @chrismlAbout Lisa, agree to disagree. Actually at the time she was the only thing my partner & I disagreed about. Naturally she was Team Vicky while I was steadfast as Team Lisa.  About John & twin paternity, I think that like the 3 pillows was a transitory idea someone had that no one else agreed with. More of the attempt to accommodate Philece. About MJ, co-sign, 100% agree, if there were more degrees I would claim them. About Wally & Felicia, always a fan. Mitch? Eh, take or leave. Although I do agree that WGE is a really striking man. Who have I left out? I don't know so that's all I got.
    • RIP Wayne Lewis.

      Please register in order to view this content

      (he sings near the end of the episode) https://deadline.com/2025/06/wayne-lewis-dead-atlantic-starr-founder-singer-1236426870/
    • Dallas peaked early, IMO. Maybe not a fair statement as I’m still making my way through the first half of its run, but I think it’s hard to argue to point that S3 into S4 was its high point. Back to Knots. Wrapping up “And Never Brought to Mind.” Greg’s introduction kinda took me by surprise. I low-key dreaded his arrival bc I know he very quickly gets to the center of the show, but even though they wasted no time connecting him with Mac, Abby, Gary, and Karen, it still feels like a gradual intro. The juxtaposition of the ending of the Chip story with the heating up Abby’s plotting is quite symbolic of the changes the show was going through. I absolutely cannot imagine Kenny and Ginger having any part in any of this. Yall, the Gary/Val piano theme that they pull out from time to time is my FAVORITE. I find myself humming it constantly.
    • Bloodshed is inevitable now. It’s another reason I’m glad Black people aren’t getting involved in these protests. As awful as this is, I keep reminding myself that 54 percent of Latino men voted for Trump. These people were put in harm’s way by members of their own communities and sometimes even members of their own families. Too many people decided to touch the stove.
    • Maybe I'm still in denial, but nothing about Neighbours' ongoing social media output gives the vibe of a show that's ending. In today's 'Roundup' video, Alan Fletcher referenced that production finishes in five weeks, but in all the show's posts the cast are as jovial and lighthearted as ever. Remarkably so for people who are about to lose their jobs.    Perhaps they're just putting a brave face on things, and I know they approached the previous axing with a positive attitude. Maybe putting an upbeat face on things is a collective way of showing potential backers that there's still life in the show? Or is it possible that they already know the show has been saved, and we'll get an announcement next month when filming wraps and the show 'rests'?   Does any of that make sense?!
    • A very good week for male eye candy on GH. New Michael is beautiful, Curtis's arms looked great in that polo shirt, Cody looks even more handsome with his new haircut AND we got Marco in swim shorts rocking his lovely bod and chest fur. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Yeah when Jamey Giddens did breakdowns for DAYS, he would sometimes state in tweets that specific things were his idea that he had pitched to Ron.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy