Jump to content

AMC: Actor OUT?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Given that Vincent has carried a lot of the show since his return and is a focal point of so many stories it's odd they would play hardball. I'm not sure what else they would have lined up, unless Rylee are suddenly threatened by Ryan's evil doppleganger Bryan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The thing for me is why would they go through all of the trouble of having David find about Greenlee's betrayal if he was just gonna die right afterward? And who originated the "puppeteer" terminology to describe post-death!David's activities? Unless he committed suicide after leaving evidence to set it up like a murder, I don't see how he'll be puppeteering anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe puppeteer was the wrong word for it, but if VI is really out, my guess is David must have a safe deposit box full of evidence against the residents of Pine Valley. We know he's set up Greenlee for Erica's plane crash and he figured out that the Hubbards & Madison were covering up Henry's death. Maybe he's going to have Liza release a bunch of this stuff during the inevitable murder trial?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There's really no question in my mind that this is pretty close to accurate. They're reporting he's out, then he reports he's in negotiations. They find out he's said he's in negotiations and have him backtrack and then repeat that he's out ... to keep face for their "David's [really!!!] dead" story.

In translation...

"We are sorry to lose Vincent due to his time off until January 2011, but we couldn't resist this amazing story and ratings stunt. We'd like to thank Digest, Weekly, and In Depth for their participation in our fantastic trick. Expect many unexpected twists and plot developments - the pinnacle of them being David revealing he faked his death early next year seconds following somebody's execution [or wedding]!"

I have no inside information about this - so please don't go reporting any of the above as fact (for ex: "I just read he's returning in January!") - but I'm quite positive this will be proven accurate by around February 2011.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, but no one (and I include the people who are offline) buys into this stunt. This is the price that soaps pay for years of refusing to kill off major characters and let stay dead. Good news for AMC is probably save some dough until VI returns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't tell you how much I wish you were right but one look at the AMC Facebook page will show you that LOTS of people are buying into this stunt. Not everybody, not by a long shot but easily 50-70%. OTOH, when this turns out to be a hoax/stunt I may very well file a complaint with the FCC just to remind ABC that they don't operate in a vacuum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know Curlee/Demorest tried to give Roger a conscience in regard to raping Holly, and Zas is magnificent in those scenes with Alex. But he kinda ends up blaming Adam and the fact he (well, really the writers) ignores raping Rita and being responsible for her and Ed's child's death make it less than convincing.  I do think during 89-93 they were careful to not whitewash his past with Holly, but his occasional bouts of conscience always seemed to be overridden by his obsession/lust for her. The only purely good thing I can ever recall him doing is helping Maureen during the blackout, and even then, had she lived, he would've found a way to call that favor in. I've kinda resisted saying it, but it's kind of clear to me Long was determined to have her own version of Erica Kane, and God help us all, it ended up as Reva Shayne. Although at least Kim could act. (Sorry LaLucci fans) Honestly, I'm not even sure CBS soaps ever a character as larger than life as Reva. 
    • Regardless, I'd still like to see more episodes from the 80s...there is very little of Charlotte Greer, Kirklands and Greenberg's out there sadly.
    • A black family having a white maid would be a good subversion of stereotypes. Also want to say that while the overall show has many flaws, the biggest one that's legitimately stifling is the lack of a rival family.
    • I also do not like the bits I've seen with Delia during Labine's 83 return. I am glad when she came back for the last time in 1986, she allowed Delia to move on from Frank. 
    • Thanks for the well-detailed reply. I'm fairly early in my viewing, so I have some time before it goes nuts. Thanks a lot! @kalbir and @DRW50 thank you so much. I am just approaching 100 episodes, so I'm good for now. 
    • The Duprees as the main family isn't the problem, but the fact is that over 3/4 of the cast are Duprees.. so it limits coupling potential and also keeps the canvas too closed in. Too many female Duprees and no hetero, nor gay, male Duprees is also a problem.   I also agree with @DemetriKanethat the male characters are one note, and not very layered/interesting... outside of Bill, that is. To me, I would have focused on either Nicole's family and dynamics or Dani's family and dynamics instead of trying to introduce/develop both families at the same time.  Nicole's family is more developed and interesting with loads of storyline possiblities then Dani's family right now. And because MVJ and co decided to feature so many Duprees... we're less likely to be free of any outside characters like Ashley/Derek since they're the non-Dupree part of the canvas.
    • BTG: A B&B: B DAYS: B+ GH: A- Y&R: C-
    • I can not see Kat as a police officer and do not want that for her. Thats not her passion nor does she care about that stuff. The stuff with Eva and Leslie is specific to her life and wanting to protect her family. Her "detective" skills have more to do with her business background, which makes her very analytical and pay close attention to details. If this show had a corporation, she'd make a shrewed businesswoman and CEO I definitely dont want to see her sleep with her cousin's husband. That would be too much of a Hayley redux which ironically you dont want with the Sharon/Hayley theory
    • I would make Jan, Ashley's mom, Anita and Vernon's maid. It would lock in to why Leslie would choose to befriend both her and Mona. It also gives Ashley a connection to the Duprees and explains how she befriended Naomi. I would have had Derek start the show as a cop to explain his connection to Jacob. Kat needs to realize that she is MADE to be a detective. Have her go through police training, making the appropriate comments about the uniform along the way. Have her prove she is so much more than a rich princess, even to herself. Then, when Jacob's partner is proven to be dirty, Kat is assigned as Jacob's rookie trainee. At the same time, Naomi does finally get a case she can follow through on. Her client is a person that Jacob arrested. This puts them at odds because Jacob knows this person did it, as does Kat, but Naomi only sees the extenuating circumstances and believes he deserves a lighter sentence and a second chance. THAT is when Jacob will turn to Kat in frustration and she will lose her virginity to him. 
    • This opened my eyes and appeals to my logic. But, don't you also think that the fact that they are so ill-suited means that, by soap-opera-laws, they aren't a long term item?  I like how Belle is written now, so I appreciate the fact that she is in this story.  But, I don't believe anything will become of it, and I think EJ is going to mess it up very soon.  Which explains why I don't get too worked up over it. I'm also suspending my outrage until I see how EJ treats Belle during her mourning.  If he cheats with Cat, then we'll know that he was never meant to be happy.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy