Jump to content

Bravo's The Real Housewives of....


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Members
But they knew nothing happened at the BH reunion. The way these reunions work is they film for most of the day and then edit it down into hour long shows. There was nothing there which justified them editing the footage into 3 episodes as opposed to 2. IMO, BH had less going for it last season than NYC currently does. If NYC only gets 2 parts for its reunion it'll only be bc the ratings are low and Bravo doesn't feel its worth spending an additional hour on it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Cheap21

    5000

  • Taoboi

    4063

  • Cat

    4032

  • NothinButAttitude

    3991

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

That's the core of my argument so I think we're basically on the same page. All things being equal BH has become the more important franchise to Bravo (from what I can tell just looking at it as a viewer) and NY has been relatively weak compared to the other shows (except for Miami). So from a ratings standpoint and investment standpoint I would think that Bravo probably wouldn't want to spend the extra money to do the third part. I might be wrong and I might be right. Just offering my thoughts on the subject for what they're worth.

Luann's little fake act of being upset with Sonja and her coocoo nail lady was pretty funny to me. Esp considering all the rumors that have been said about her over the years re her first marriage and now Jac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

NYC hasn't had a 3 part reunion since season 3. Although, wasn't season 4's two 90-minute episodes? Or was just one of them 90 minutes? Either way, I just don't think they had the story or the conflict this season to stretch out 3 hours worth of reunion.

Edited by Gray Bunny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lisa has always been popular. Kyle doesn't gravitate to or away from her due to audience reaction. Lisa signed on for another season so she needs to at least semi get along with some of these women for filming sake and, well, Lisa was the one trying to crawl back up Kyle's behind last season. It was Kyle saying "Uhm, not so quick" in response. Twasn't the other way around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Really? Kyle spent all of Season 3 begging for Lisa's forgiveness for what she said at the Season 2 reunion. I will admit I zoned in and out of Season 4 but Lisa honestly didn't seem to care if she and Kyle were cool or not. She apologized and kept it moving. After all that over dramatized whining they did most of the audience on the internet still sided with Lisa. Kyle looks at that and tries to befriend Lisa again.

I have no real opinion on the four versus one drama as I felt both sides were in the wrong. I can at least respect that when Yolanda doesnt like someone or their ways she doesnt back down because of what people who dont know the whole story tweet and blog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Can't believe this hasn't been posted yet! Here's the RHONJ Preview Special:

http://vimeo.com/97190481

So glad I found this. I'm more excited to see the new season now. Dina's return is seamless, Melissa is more watchable like her first season and I like that the other ladies are being very judgmental of Teresa. It keeps things interesting. I was expecting everyone to kiss her ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
She was asked if they were close friends and Yolanda said they were close during filming and Brandi took offense and ran to tweet about it. Yolanda didn't lie. Most of these women hang out during filming and that's it. Brandi is overdramatic and took the comment too seriously.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
:lol: You are right. I guess that makes her a hypocrite but I do feel that Yolanda keeps it 100 at all times. If she doesnt like you, you will know it. Kyle is phony to me and I find her hanging with Lisa to be a case of wanting to get back in the star of the show's good graces. Honestly I dont know the whole story of these women's issues and I like that Yolanda doesnt waver in what she believes in based of a tweet from someone in Anywhere, USA. I know I am going to get my head cut off but it's just how i feel. Lol Edited by Eric83
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree that Yolanda is truthful BUT how she plotted that gang up with Brandi, Kyle, and Kim last season totally turned me off. How she belittled Joyce too unnerved me. And we all know that Kyle is only being nice to Lisa because the fans still favored her over everyone. Their plot to bring down the Queen failed miserably. While Lisa did shady sh*t last season, everything she did was forgotten after they ambushed her the way they did. I'm all for confronting but I don't like an ambush or gang up. Everyone could've told Lisa their issues one on one. Not at the dinner table (again) after Lisa said she didn't stuff those magazines in Brandi's bag.

With the exception of Yolanda, the other four are going to try and kiss Lisa's ass to get back in her good graces; however, Lisa will never forget what they've done. She'll deal with them from arms length if anything. I'm praying though that this season is: 1. The downfall of Brandi and 2. The end of Kim. This bi*ch needs to be demoted to a friend position and I hope she is. Kim brings nothing to the show. I refuse to watch another season of her whining over Kingsley, and her belligerent, incompetent attacks on people. Coke wh*re, be gone!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well well well...

Kandi is not the passive little idiot we thought she was. Presenting the man she loves with completed signifyouwanttomarryme pre-nup papers 2 days before the wedding? That is some slick sh!t right there. You don't do that to someone you love. Kandi has every right to protect what is hers, but when you love someone, you treat them better than this. Walking out of the marriage with everything she came in with is understandable, but to not want Todd to have anything and he has to vacate the premises 30 days after a separation or if he gets sick? Wow! That is not love. Kandi wants to be married and show up to events with a man on her arm. She wants to be a power couple with somebody. What happens if Todd does his own thing and Kandi does not believe he supports her projects enough? She just leaves with no consideration for him?

Dragon bitch from hell Mama Joyce taught her well!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kandi also had something in there that Todd wouldn't get anything if she died. I didn't like that. Thankfully she took that out of the will. She was ridiculous to think she could throw that at Todd two days before and he would sign with no issues

At the same time Todd should have been keeping it real with Kandi. He was talking in circles and made the lawyer say how he really felt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy