Jump to content

Y&R Episodes Discussion, Week of November 2, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 242
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well, of course my opinion matters to myself. It's why I change the channel if I don't like what I see. LOL!

Which is why (so Toups doesn't come after me with a chainsaw) I didn't change the channel during the Phillip/Chance/Nina scene today. Because I liked it. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like this new Ashley, but I wonder how long will it take until she breaks down again because we all know it will happen once she learns the real paternity of Faith. It's stupid how all these women need to be victimized all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I found there was much to admire on Wednesday actually:

- I liked seeing P3 and Nina, and I liked that we finally got a hint of some of the complexity of the Chance resentment.

- I liked that Chance had a backbone with Chloe. I also liked seeing him in workout gear, LOL.

- I thought Bergman did a great job..."Am I being fired?"

- Emily seems more and more interesting, and I liked her interaction with Bergman and Davidson

- The show is moving RESOLUTELY to business storylines, so I am intrigued by Kay taking Chancellor public

- There is a promise for Neil to be in the thick of this, and he was the only watchable part of the Winters for me yesterday. I cannot watch Lily-Cane, and I'm irritated by how facilely they resolved Devon's romantic crisis OFF CAMERA

Beyond the Winters/Cane, I find myself a little perplexed by why Kay suddenly needs to "make amends". And I am groaning that her lost offspring is coming back into the mix. The show needed to take a break from that for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wonder if Katherine taking the company public means she will lose Chancellor via some sort of takeover or other collapse (she is a woman, after all).

I do like the brief focus on Chance and his parents. I wish Chloe weren't involved, as I often get the feeling this is all about her (and EH tends to get more of the focus in the soap magazine piece about these episodes). I like EH and I like Chloe a lot more when she isn't in the needy stalker role but I'm sorry they didn't do more with the Phillip/Nina/Chance relationships outside of her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I worry about the same. At least they explicitly addressed Jack's Jabot debacle...implying it would be avoided. Clearly, Kay having an undivided 51% or even 60%, or limiting the public shares to non-voting stock, would all be fixes. They acknowledged the economy, but I find the property of an IPO in this climate quite implausible.

My fear is that this will be used to bring Kay's lost child back into the fold...and this won't be a nice person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So are you expecting someone to take over Chancellor and then we find out that this is her long lost child and they are going to ruin her business out of revenge for being given away at birth?

I'd hate to see that, although I would hope this might throw her and Jill together in a positive way, as they fight to save the company. Then again, if it's a man, then he might win Jill over and get her to work with him against Katherine.

All of this could be a very interesting, long storyline...if it was written by someone like Harding Lemay. With Sheffer and Rauch, it scares me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, you offer a compelling rationale for why Kay wouldn't let this rest. And, for the show, it makes some sense that they'd want to get this person in place before Jeanne becomes too infirm to launch the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy