Jump to content

Y&R: Episode Discussion for the week October 19


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I love Y&R now - and it's not boring. That's all I care about really. I remember Tuvia, and the long, drawn out Cassandra Rawlins saga. This stuff is interesting, vivd and makes me want to see each episode everyday. I could care less about the old shows I used to watch - B&B included. Y&R still continues to elicit pages and pages of interest. When Y&R has a mothly Episode discussion, then Y&R is truly dead.

- i love this new Doctor. I see some potential there.

- giving Ryder a big bad mama with ties to GC is good spice.

- Ashley/Sharon is pretty cool so far with Ashley in a whole new attitude.

There's not so good stuff too for sure!! But I can't remember a time when there WASN'T not so good stuff on Y&R. It's a soap! there's always improbable happenings. The same people hate the show and they have every right to, but I'll never understand why they don't put their energy into something that's fruitful. MAB ain't going nowhere and you can beat all the drums you want to.

I'm truly bummed about EB and now possibly MTS - will the show be the same? No. But as long as I watch it everyday, and it still entertains, I'm a fan of the show. When things get ATWT bad and people no longer even care what happens cause it's so ludicrous, that's the sign that the show is off the rails. People still care about Y&R good or bad, for a reason, cause it still interests us. The other shows are sort of an afterthought or a - oh what's going on there, not a must-see this event.

What also perplexes me is that if Y&R ever got good to the haters, would they be able to admit it? Would they say Wow - great show today? No - cause all the hate they've spouted for the past year, and calls for people's heads on a platter would be invalidated. There's roughly 20 regular posters on Y&R threads here and I hate to say it but we don't represent the entire viewing public. I understand why people HATE that I revealed that people from Y&R read this board cause now people think they have some democratic voice in the show - we don't. Make 100 more fire everybody threads and it won't make a difference to anyone, or create change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It's short term gains with bad long term consequences. Patty murdering an animal and nearly killing a child wasn't boring, and they had to bring in a doppleganger because they ruined her. Adam having a pervert "treat" Ashley after he threw her fetus in the fireplace wasn't boring, but the character was ruined. In other cases, like Phillip's return, there really wasn't even short term gain.

The question is not if the show is completely unentertaining, but what are they building to? Does anything on the show have any impact for future storylines?

I'm probably always going to have a hard time praising anything which Sheffer is involved with, because of the damage he's inflicted on the soaps I've watched. I think a lot of other people here don't have that issue and were genuinely enjoying the show for a while. There's a reason they have stopped liking it.

Ultimately, most of the older actors will be written out, and so will a lot of other legacy characters. What will be left? Will a show about Kevin, Amber, Sharon, Nick, Chloe, and Billy be watchable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They didn't show Adam throw a fetus into the fireplace and if they did - so what? Adam's a bad guy. He does bad things cause he hates his life and blames everyone else. Didn't disgust me or shock me. Was he ruined? Like when Victor fed rats to his prisoner? It's a soap and things can turn around on a dime or they can't. if anything ruined Adam it was Muhney in the role. The soap goes on.

These vendettas against the the writers are so arbitrary - do you know for a fact if Sheffer wrote that? Or does your gut tell you that? ony's treating the actors like crap not MAB and Rauch.

What's it all leading to? I don't know, armegeddon as some would think? But it still generates energy and interest and we all take for granted that Y&R is the #1 soap in ratings but it's kept its presence there for a reason - it's still good soap. You may not like where it's going and some things are sloppy and aggravating, but it still keeps u up at night posting about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Adam's not supposed to be a bad guy. They had him cry over memories of Hope and they now pass off his taking Sharon's baby as a sign of how good he is, because he wanted to repent for what he did to Ashley. I don't really see how what Victor did makes the Adam story any better. Bill Bell knew how to get out of story corners. This group doesn't.

Even if we're not talking about Adam, what about other stories? Why did Devon have to sleep with Tyra? Why did they kill Colleen and give Victor her heart when they knew they were probably writing Victor out anyway? Why did Billy and Sharon sleep together? Why did they need to have the Amber/Deacon stuff where he made her have sex with him? Why did Jill go work at the nail salon? Why did they bring Phillip back? Why did they have Adam sleep with Rafe?

Since I've seen Sheffer do stories about woman-hating weirdos on various soaps, I assume he has a hand in a lot of this, along with Rauch. Pet killing and she says no but she means yes, like the Amber/Deacon story, are also his trademarks. He did the same stories on his other soaps.

Rauch treated actors poorly for years. I'm happy if he is now a changed man, but I find it hard to believe.

Y&R is #1 in the ratings because of what was built up in the past, not what we're seeing now. The very foundation of the show, which is basically being eaten away. If anything, MAB's tenure has driven away big portions of the audience that made the show #1.

If you're enjoying the show, then I'm glad, and I'm sure you're not the only one, but a lot of people have become disillusioned, even some of their biggest backers, like Branco. It's not just about haters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This "give Adam a second chance" would work so much better if he hadn't committed all of those crimes. I know that I personally would enjoy the time when Adam would finally get out of jail and try to win over Victor's trust. Sadly, the entire family has fallen into pieces with crappy storytelling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes. Brilliant, isn't it?

If they were going to do this Restless Style vendetta story with Billy, then why not bring back Leanna Love, who also hates the Newmans and has plenty of experience with publishing and the media?

I guess then it wouldn't be about what a big tough man Billy is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with everything you say. The show is just bittersweet for me right now, because there are alot of things that I'm liking... but I'm so incredibly let down from the apparent abortion of any major gay SL. I was so looking forward to it, and I just feel like I had the rug pulled out from under me. I guess the only thing I can do is move on, and get over it. I've had to do it before, and I guess I'll be doing it again. As long as Y&R still LOOKS relatively like Y&R (And they don't pull out any un-steady cams or GL production values) then I'll be there watching. I'm sad to see Eric go, and I have to say... if this were Jess, I'd a WHOLE LOT MORE upset. If it were Jeanne, I'd be LIVID. But time marches on, and I guess we have to let go. I'm just not one who likes to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A little of both, although I lean more towards the latter. I'm waiting to see whether they will turn this one into a headcase too.

They're probably not going to get rid of Jeanne, as that would be a PR disaster. I think Eric and Melody are the first scalps and either Jess will be written out, or just slowly fade away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What a rude thing to say. So if you dislike the show at any given moment, you're no longer a fan, but a hater? So the years of devotion and the generations of my family watching this show means nothing? Wow. Thanks. If we didn't care we wouldn't still be watching the show. I know that even though the show is bad now, it'll be watchable again which is why I keep watching. And yes, I can admit when something is good. Everybody has been raving about Beth Maitland's performances. I've enjoyed some things here and there, but that doesn't make a good show. It doesn't mean everything is okay just because it's better than the worst soap on TV.

Not only is the show incredibly mediocre, but it's making decisions this year that will damage the show in the long term. We've already lost Victoria Rowell. Eric Braeden and Melody Thomas Scott are most likely gone. Next year let's say Christian LeBlanc, Tracey Bregman and Kristoff St. John are gone. Jess Walton is dropped to recurring or simply continues to be minimized. Do you really think that won't affect the show? Ratings will continue to erode as they have since MAB began. She took us from 6 million (which was fairly consistant from Jack Smith/LML) to around 4.8 million, always treading downward. When next year Y&R is barely getting 4 million viewers, you don't think that'll lead to more budget cuts and more exits? So we basically have tons of newbies on top of newbies that will be the new faces of Y&R combined with mediocre writing. That won't work. If Y&R continues on this path it'll be in the gutter with the other soaps within two years. Then when it's too late they'll bring Victoria Rowell and Eric Braeden back. Try and get the fans back, but they'll be too burned to care.

So say what you will, but the trends are so negative that it's clear we ARE the majority, no matter what you say. Tell me where that 1.2 million viewers went and how that's a good thing, if you want to call us haters. Otherwise, focus on discussing the show and not insulting the fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know why you think this, Carl. If they wanted to get Jill out, they would enver have tried to recast her when Jess was in negotiations. There's been no inkling of a casting call for Nikki, so I think the handwriting's on the wall for Nikki. I LOVED the previews for tomorrow.. the !@#$%^&*] decides to walk into the christening with Nikki on his arm. He's such a jackass. It'll be sad to see Beth go, but I'm glad we got her for as long as we did. Alvin said that her last day was going to be Monday October 12 a couple weeks ago... I'm glad his source turned out to be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Cashton, alphanguy, I can absolutely relate to your love for the show mixed with the bittersweet.

I am fully aware that I am excited about the show this week (especially after the last three episodes) because we are entering into a new cycle of SLs and everything feels a bit more peppy and vibrant.

I also adore the Abbotts and yesterday's show was Abbotts Central, so I was thrilled. I was thrilled because it was about Abbotts AND business. The fact that Jill and Jack are about to be sparring at Jabot... damn, it has been YEARS since those two were mentioned in the same breath as the show's signature company. (I consider Jabot the signature corporation -- NE was always "the rival" to me). Coupled with Billy having scenes with Traci and Ashley about a business venture, and it was like somebody opened a window in a stuffy room. All three characters seemed strangely energized.

Actor of the day HAS to be Stacy Haiduk. You know, I am SO not into the idea of this doppelganger SL. Genoa City is becoming Mutant Genetics City with all these lookalikes running around. I half expect Stefano Dimera and his brain chips to move into the Newman Ranch and give Adam some mustache-twirling/DNA-mutating advice. But Stacy is bringing it. Bringing it as Patty AND as Dr. P. Even though her speaking voice is SO distinctive, I really felt like I was watching a scene with two different women and that is testament to Haiduk. I think she walked in there and decided exactly how she wanted Dr. P to come across and it worked. I am not sold on the story... but I am intrigued by this new character. It is also cool seeing SH playing sane and rational.

I am also kinda intrigued by Ryder and his mystery mom. The actor looked familiar to me and when I saw yesterday that he had been one of the leads on Generation Kill yesterday (a GREAT HBO show by the same people who did The Wire about the US marines invading Iraq in 2003), I've got to see that biased me in his favor. He is a newbie and probably won't be on all that long but I am confident that this guy has some acting chops.

I am bracing myself for

because that is going to change the face of Y&R, more than any of us can fully anticipate right now. I just wanted to point out what I felt was a solid episode filled with some interesting character interactions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy