Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I'm glad Beverlee McKinsey didn't return to AW as Iris as I grew up with Carmen Duncan and I think she was a phenomenal actress. She should have won the Emmy for the chief and Mac's death storylines. Beverlee MCKinsey was so good as Alexandra and also should have won an Emmy for her work there (even if her last months were a mess for Alexandra and Simms's Mindy).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Oh yeah, that was the other part that I wonder if Nancy Curlee wanted to forget when she got back: the fact that there had been a Kristen DiMera prototype running around town in such an outlandish story.  Not only is there very little Nadine/Bridget interaction for the rest of 1993 that I've seen, but there is also very exposition about how it is that almost nobody in town knows that Bridget had a baby when he and the father live in town.

Oh, I know she was in college, but I could swear there was some reference to Bridget still being 17 when the story started (I mean, the teens were still in high school when she slept with Hart and got pregnant).  Then she was stuck in that dark attic with no human contact except Nadine herself, who was constantly trying to shoo her back up there anytime she wandered downstairs.  And Nadine manipulated Bridget's exposure to news of the outside world to keep her compliant, including most egregiously the news of Maureen's death as you mentioned.  I know it was not kidnapping in a legal sense, but it was exploiting a very young person, who I still believe was a minor to begin with.

 

Actually, in hindsight both Jenna and Nadine were "punished" in that exact same way, in the same year (still not sure what exactly Jenna was being punished for, though).  It did make Nadine more sympathetic, but upon recent viewing it seemed more about making them each dependent on Buzz than any kind of character development.

It also didn't make any sense.  Beyond the sheer odds that they would each go from being that wealthy to completely broke back-to-back, they both seemed to accept their fates way too easily.  Nadine had no reason to agree to a quick divorce from Billy without a settlement when she knowing how eager he was to remarry Vanessa and keep things quiet about Peter; she could have just held out for something and/or threatened to make trouble.  And I can't believe one of Spauldings' competitors wouldn't have offered Jenna some kind of consulting gig, if only to pick her brain after she'd run the company for the better part of a year and it was still in business.

Given all that's been written about FOJs, it's hard not to think in hindsight that there was a mandate to have multiple established female characters become beholden to Buzz.  God bless Curlee and the others who were still writing and made most of the related stories coherent and often compelling, but both characters should have had more promising options than the Coopers' largess at that point in their lives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was thinking about Alexandra based on the recent discussion.  Now, I would watch Beverlee McKinsey read the proverbial phone book, but the character lacked consistency and a defining characteristic.  For example, Reva was always Reva regardless of who wrote her (a southern belle whose relationships were always doomed by her sense of inadequacy), and except when he became inexplicably European, Alan was always Alan regardless of who played him (an obsessive conniver who could never trust that a woman would truly love him for who he was).

But what consistently motivated Alex? 

She seemed protective of young men like Phillip, Lujack, and Alan-MIchael.  But, she wasn't a traditional matriarch.  She came on as an antagonist for Alan, but I'm still unsure of their family dynamic, or the source of the animosity.  Did Brandon treat them differently?  It seems like he was equally a jerk to both kids.  As Beverlee played her, she wasn't that interested in business, but later she became a tyrannical boss.  She either obsessed over men like Cyrus, or she could take 'em or leave 'em, so she never had one true love.  She also never seemed to be a snob about the Spaulding name or legacy.

To me, it seems like they didn't want an Alexis Colby-clone, and so she maintained these warm relationships with her sons and pseudo-sons.  But, her traits were fluid based on the plot.

Obviously, all of this is over simplified for brevity.  But, if I were to make a list of my favorite GL characters, I don't think Alexandra would crack the top 10.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The animosity between Alex and Alan was that he hadn't helped her when Brandon disowned her. Brandon somehow engineered taking Lujack from her when he was about three. Alex later accused Alan of helping Brandon kidnap Lujack. Alan denied it, telling her Brandon let her believe that to drive a wedge between them. (that came out when Alan asks Alex to keep Marah's paternity a secret from Josh.)

I thought what motivated Alex was her need for control and inability to trust. It dooms her romantic relationships, it complicates her family relationships. The year or so, she did lie low about Spaulding, but that was because she was scheming to claim her share to give to her son. She goes as far as to blackmail Henry and Quint out of their shares (or out of the controlling interest they had) by reminding them about the kickback Henry and Vanessa took from the Jocelyn Electronics deal when Spaulding and Chamberlain merged, and "worrying" that an SEC investigation could see Vanessa face charges. (long story short, Vanessa had paid it back, and when Alex brought it back up Vanessa was pregnant with Bill and had left town over Billy's obsession with Reva and the Slut of Springfield debacle)

She had a matriarchal streak, but I don't think Marj got to play that as much. By the time she was cast, Phillip and Alan-Michael were rotating in and out of the show.

 

Sigh...1991 spends way too much time on Mallet's mob ex-girlfriend. WAY too much time.

Edited by P.J.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Those with a better knowledge of GL can correct me, but these are my impressions.

Alexandra in the Kobe/Long era was introduced as a jet setting socialite divorced from wealthy European Baron von Halkein. I haven't seen enough of Kobe/Long era to know if Alexandra had much interest in Spaulding Enterprises. Calhoun era Alexandra was business-minded and JFP era had Alexandra become a messy matriarch attempting to control her son's love life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's the way I remember her, and why I consider her to be all over the place in terms of character and motive.  For example, the whole Chamberlain blackmail episode in 1984 was much more about getting revenge on Alan, and putting Phillip in charge, than actually wanting to run Spaulding.  But, years later, she suited up for the job on a daily basis. 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't remember much about the Mallet/Francesca storyline - didn't she marry some mobster in order to protect him or something? - but I do remember wondering why the show was asking us to care so deeply about two characters who didn't have any real ties to the rest of the canvas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do think Mallet worked better in that format than the tedious pairing with Harley. I wish they had paired him with Mindy instead. The moment with the two of them together after Francesca left was one I still remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Side note: I was thinking about the irony of the number of children John, Victor, and Stefano found later in life.  I wonder if Tony Dimera will ever find a long-lost child?  Either from Melaswen (I hope not), or a kid that Anna's kept hidden.
    • Does anyone else think theyre chem testing Kat/Jacob ? I will admit I like them lol 
    • She ate; today's talent cannot compare to Janet.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Irna wanted to use cities around Chicago to represent the cities around Cincinnati, where P&G's international Headquarters are, so it was by intent.  Here's the YT

      Please register in order to view this content

      at 5:05:56

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Hump Day Thoughts Let me start with the snark: I can accept that John's memorial will be held at the pub—but I do not believe that a man who spent years thinking he was a priest (and fought the devil twice) wouldn’t have wanted a church funeral. It’s not the choice of venue that bothers me—it’s the casual, throwaway dialogue that pulls me out of the moment. That said, I was genuinely riveted by the scenes of everyone catching Bo up on what he’s missed. His sense of shock and grief felt earned. Imagine waking up to find that so many people you loved had died—and that you’d caused so much pain to your wife and son. That brief moment of overwhelm was beautifully played. And if you think back to EJ or Stefan's resurrections, there was no acknowledgement of an adjustment.  (Of course, IRL, someone would’ve eventually told him: “Honestly, Bo, you were lucky to sleep through the Ron C. years.”

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) Also, kudos to Hope for maintaining Bo’s beard, haircuts, and dye jobs all these years. I actually found it realistic. Many families of coma patients do keep up with grooming, partly as a way to pass time at the bedside. And let’s be honest: in real life, a lot of bearded men wake up clean-shaven because the machines require it… or because their wives secretly hated the beard all along. Props to Brandon Beemer today for stepping up and showing more emotional range than his usual “intensity mode.” It added depth, and it was needed. As for the chatter about the gay quad. I’ve read the comments, and I get the appeal, but I’ve never been a Paul fan. The guy’s just a drip. Not for me.  
    • Honestly Mona shouldn’t even matter. Shanice freaking talked to Leslie. But no one seems to think to show her the footage or picture of Leslie? It’s such a stupid glaring hole.  
    • Delusional Dani would view it as hope... but realistically, it's being cordial and adult...  something they both need to do.  Especially if Naomi and Chelsea ever decide to have children... it would be nice to have them being mature around one another and their kids and grandkids.   Kat needs to simmer down and let the police do their job.  I can excuse the coat and trying it on because she didn't know that it was previously Silk Press Sheila's... but the way she was with Mona when Mona was asked to ID the person in the video was Kat 'leading the witness on'. Even Mona said that she was now more then determined to see if Leslie/Dana was on the camera.   So a defense attorney could paint Mona as an unreliable witness.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy