Jump to content

Y&R Episode Discussion for the week of July 13


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Im finally all caught up with y&r after being on vacation for the past week. Wow could they make it anymore obvious that a baby switch may be in the future. I dindt like the speculation on this board but Im pretty convinced of it now

Brad has been dead for how long and Victor still finds Colleen to be a nuisance? This plot lost all its punch considering she only appears once or twice a month and they have done little with this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 378
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Ok... I have to know this: Who the HELL let Marcille on the soundstage with her fingernails painted like a basket of damned EASTER EGGS????!!! I'd have sent that bitch down to the CVS for some Lee press-ons and made her pay for it with her OWN MONEY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's the thing. Only one of them has a baby. The other one had their baby burned in the fireplace or flushed down the toilet or whatever. This means they're going to have to come up with either a live baby or a dead baby for one of them. A live baby would be anticlimactic.What would be the point of both of them having live births? Nah. We, the audience will probably have to be subjected to watching one of these already half crazy women, both of whom have lost a child or two, lose yet another baby.

Can't wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's supposed to be fashionable.

Victor and Ashley were going to have the reception at the GCU frat house (Nick has connections there). TOGA, TOGA, TOGA. It's something JT would enjoy, Victoria is going to make him babysit Reed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Caught the episode yesterday evening.

ICAM with both of these posts on how I felt about the show. Although I can also understand and agree with others concerning the destruction of the Colleen character, I found some things about this episode entertaining.

The thing is that I tend to give writers very liberal creative license at times to tell their stories. So I can look over some story holes. Like Toups, the pacing is the biggest issue I have with the show right now. Could the "favorites" - MS, SC, PB, EB - have a guarantee of 5 shows a week in their contracts? Is that still realistic in today's soap world? How could it not be cheaper for them to show the "faves" M-W-F and other stories on Tu and Thur? It would make the show alot more enjoyable.

In-T-Wayzz.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really like the new Mac. She isn't especially exciting but I don't know... I like how she's just kinda laid back and quiet. You can't do much with her but as a supporting character she's pretty cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She's really grown on me the last few weeks. When she first came on I really didn't like her, but like you said ian, as a supporting character, she works. I think she works really well as someone that the others can go to for support or a "talk to" character. I'm still out on whether she works with Billy though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Billy Miller is putting a lot into it... so it's working OK - but they don't have a lot of push. I can see him not ending up with Chloe because they were doomed from the start, but BM and EH are excellent apart and together at any rate, in any scenes they share.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
    • I'm pretty sure he was. But point taken. GL really had a thing for masked and costumed balls/parties in the '80's. Everyone looks fabulous, but those poor costume designers.
    • Still here ^^ Come on Prime Video, it's due to bring it back!
    • Got through the eighth season, and it was... painful. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree 100% with both you and Mitch64.  Soaps have been going further and further off-course since 1981. TPTB just don't have a fundamental understanding of what makes soap fans so loyal. I'd love to be on a writing team with both of you.  Maybe we could put together a real soap opera, and show people what its all about...  
    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary Journal headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
    • YES. The videos being uploaded to Spauldingfield are almost to the point where Alan is reintroduced. They're already talking about the guy he pretends to be, and yes, he returns at a masked ball. In fact, that masked ball is almost beat for beat the same as the masked ball where Alex was introduced! Get a new schtick. Before the Kobe era, that's pretty much what they did. Characters would just show up. Maybe other characters would talk about them for a while--the Chamberlains, Tony, Maureen, Andy, Kelly, Carrie--but then they would just appear. When Hope came back, she simply knocked on Bert's door and said something like, "Hi, Grandma, I'm home again." No particular fanfare. Sometimes it would be a bit dramatic--Jennifer and Morgan were introduced when Mike accidentally crashed into their car, for instance, and Alan and Elizabeth were introduced through Jackie's flashbacks when she was remembering giving up Phillip for adoption. Nola was involved in the Roger return. Roger's return in 1980 was very dramatic, but in a way that made total sense. He was trying to kidnap a child, so dressing up as a clown did not seem crazy. The mask bit was not only silly, it didn't even make sense. Alex never knew him, so there was no reason for him to be masked in front of her. Yeah, she knew OF him, but there's that phenomenon called cognetive dissonance. If you see someone outside of an expected situation, you probably won't recognize them, especially if you never met them in person and think they're dead. I bet a CIA spook like Roger would be familiar with that concept. And he didn't have to be skulking around SF for months. Again, I will cut Long a little slack--it was not her idea to bring back Roger, she was told to do it. She never wrote for the character. It was something that was not planned. They originally went to Zaslow to offer him the role of Alan. He, of course, turned them down because that was a ridiculous idea, but then he suggested coming back as Roger. At such short notice, it's not strange his return was not handled well.
    • Eh...but neither had been in town. Know the name Roger Thorpe? Sure. But Alex would have gone crazy trying to memorize all of Alan's co-conspirators/lovers/wives and Fletch didn't even know Roger/Adam was on the island, IIRC. But who knew or should've known each other is always a little dicey when people come back to town. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy