Jump to content

Anthony Geary Bashes Wendy Riche's GH


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I have to admit that both the non-mention of Vaughan, and the diss of Riche, makes even me angry. I liked the Spencers in the Riche era... I also think it utterly lacks class to talk out of school about one's colleagues in that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Family doesn't belong on GH in its current incarnation. At least the Spencer's seemed like real people and a real family back then, now they're all caricatures. Luke being the bitter old drunk.

Funny how it took a lot of us a while to truly appreciate Wendy Riche. We didn't know how much things would change until she was long gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Geary thinks GH is better off without WR? Seriously? If it wasn't for Riche, GH would've been where GL is today (read: cancelled), because, God knows nobody was enjoying Gloria Monty's Eckert-centric mess!

I was always on the fence about whether Laura should reunite with Luke or with Scotty. Thanks to Geary's comments, I'm officially pro-Scotty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's more to do with how Claire Labine wrote for Luke and Laura. Heaven forbid, somebody write those two as grown-ups, with grown-up responsibilities (and a dog).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah I mean I could be wrong, but I get that impression too. Either way I could care less because the interview just reminded me of one of the many reasons I stopped watching.

You know the one thing for me with many daytime actors: many times I love hearing them voice their opinions and views, other times I read interviews and I just think to myself "just shut up and act!!" The egos at times are a bit overbearing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The actor who plays Martin has been teasing that nobody has guessed Martin's secret. I love that for things like that and the June story we have no idea. I feel like if we didn't have the day ahead feeds Anita's reveal would've been shocking as well. I love that they aren't going the obvious route with these stories. 
    • I tried following the news in Los Angeles at https://laist.com (independent public radio and news) They had up-to-the minute accurate info during the wildfires in January. There's no video, no impact to my mind as to what's happening. Trying other outlets, to get the truth, but it's hard.  
    • That's a bit murky since that happened during a writers' strike. Assuming Kristen Marie had a 2-year contract she left about when her contract would have expired and Sharlene and Josie showed up right before that. Lemay was officially credited as HW from September 1988 but it seems very probable that his anticipated tenure influenced events that happened during the strike which started in April. 
    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy