Jump to content

CBS cancels Guiding Light


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 392
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'd say that's a brilliant place to start. And I think Valentini should loan JvD to GL even if it's just the finale. It just would not be the same not to have Ross come back on the final day and speak the final words on the show. He is GL's Rachel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Assuming they've already written through mid/late May, then they have four months to wrap it up. A LOT longer than AW had (they only had two weeks from what they had already written to their last air show).

I really hope they do it justice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sad day for daytime. My heart goes out to all the GL fans out there.... I wonder how long it will take now for Frons to pull the trigger and cancel one too....

This is really depressing. As others have said however, its even sadder that an institution like GL had to go out like this. Can't a soap die with any integrity? I hope a proper sendoff is created.

Unfortunately I think perhaps 5 years..... its getting real dire.

By 2012.... I don't expect DAYS, AMC, ATWT and OLTL to be on the air..... unless something miraculously happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't really count PC/Passions/SuBe. All of them were new, all of them had weak foundations. Also, when AW went, we knew at the time that SuBe was probably done shortly after. AW and GL are different.

OLTL will be around in 2012. AMC, maybe. The other two, doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In fairness(and maybe my own foolishness) I loved GL after the massive budget cuts of 2005. I thought it was well scripted and beautifully acted for the first...maybe...year and a quarter. GL has spurts of growth where the show even bested AMC/OLTL a few weeks. Regardless of if it was a fluke, there was SOME interest there. Otherwise the numbers wouldn't have spiked the way they did. They should have built on that by making a commitment to their ensemble cast and narrative storytelling THEN. But instead, they let the poor show rot after Jonathan and Tammy get killed off and allowed these lame characters and stories to swallow the show whole.

Ellen Wheeler is great at managing a budget and uplifting her cast and crew members. The problem with her is that post-MADD, she had no one to reign in her bad ideas and without proper supervision(like other semi-competent artists), she falters. Not to mention, for someone who claims to be a Mormon and love God and all that crap, she sure holds one hell of a grudge. I mean, if the stories are true, why the hell would she need to take out notes from that longterm producer telling everyone he was leaving? Is that how you treat a longterm veteran producer that you fired? What about having the security guards follow Beth Ehlers around her old stomping grounds while she collects her things? As IF she would do anything to sabotage GL or their craptacular stories.

BTW, is Wheeler on suicide watch yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We all knew this day was coming, and as much as I've wanted this show put out of its misery for years, it's still shocking. :(

GL, I love you, you might have been irritating as hell over the past 10 years, but I love what you were when you were great and everything you stood for at your core. To me, you were always the most human-like of the big soaps, and when you told stories about hope, community, and unity, you put all other soaps to shame.

I have my memories which will always make me see this show in a good way. Thanks for making me a soap fan all those years ago GL, I know that had I not tuned into GL during one of my school breaks during the winter of 1991, I would have never gotten into the CBS soaps, or soaps at all. Thanks for everything, rest in peace finally, my love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh my, this is just soooo bad...... but so hilarious at the same time.

So..... I wonder what La Zimmer will have to say about all of this? Amelia Heinle, watch your back.... someone with fire and sass is about to be unemployed..... and would make a FABULOUS Victoria Newman....

Gina :) as others have been talking about in recent days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I felt Wheeler's dialogue staff could be very, very good. The problem is the stories often sucked, and the writers would put all their eggs in one basket and fail to do anything else. Hey, let's build a story around Ed Bauer and Roger's son, and fail to secure Peter Simon. Let's destroy our relationship with Grant Aleksander and then spend years teasing Phillip's return. Failing all that, let's just put the entire show on Jonathan. That'll never get old! I was sick of him long before his last appearance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We all played a role in this demise. Creative types, changing audiences, non-compliant affiliates, changing economy, advertiser mandates... The list is endless, and all those factors came together to bring us to this point.

Moreover, we have known we were coming here, relentlessly, for some time. To be clear...Nancy Curlee could have been writing the show continuously, they might never have fired Maureen Bauer...the show could have stayed continuously excellent since the 80s, and we'd still more or less be at this point. Maybe GL wouldn't be the next one to go...but they're all going. That's because most of the causal factors listed above have nothing to do with GL.

That is why GL is nothing but the "next" to go. Which is why -- for those of us who still love a soap or two, or the genre as a whole -- Schadenfreude is very dangerous. Truly, truly "but for the grace of god, there go I". There is an inevitability to this. The world has changed, and in the US, daytime soaps are not part of that new world.

I wrote over on Usenet (in response to someone doing a Frons-like 'where can the good actors go now?' thread), "I'm going to propose that we don't do this today -- but that's just my opinion. Some long-time viewers are hurting. Eventually, talk of new gigs and post-mortems may be helpful, because they give a sense of purpose to this. But right now, the oldest show on TV, the oldest soap...has been shuttered. For all of us, I think, that deserves ... I don't know ... a bit of love and a bit of 'godspeed'. Again, obviously, just my opinion. "

PS: Actually, if any network wanted a 'better value' soap, ABC would cancel GH and replace it with time-slot competitor GL. But it won't happen. Soaps don't translate well, ever, period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy