Jump to content

'Days' Legend Faces Divorce Money Woes


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I have never understood the hysterical emotions incited by the fact that this fembot actress will no longer be on Days. I have as much compassion for her as she did a few years ago when her fellow vets were being fired (and fired they were) and she was Corday and Reilly's mouthpiece for the storyline. "Oh this is truly a great storyline, Jim's a GENIUS!" I also can't forget the interviews she gave when Marlena "killed," Alice....going on and on about how great it is, and when her daughter asked her if she would be worried that people would be mad at her (Hall) over this, DH was all "Why would they be upset at me?" (Uh, cause you havent shown a bit of compassion to your cast mate as you are whoring up the mags with your interviews.) True, by that time she may have know that Alice wasnt really dead, but she could have acted a bit more subdued with ,"I was really upset with this. I mean, how can you kill Alice and even act like you are going to hurt Frances??It will be very difficult to act. Unlike how it was with that old queen Thao....I LOVED doing that and getting back at him for all of those Dee Hall is a lesbo rumour I just KNOW the bitch floated..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why should she pay her ex alimony when she has no current income (and thus like anyone else not working is utilizing her savings), two children to support and oh yeah, he's already rich?

Always strikes me as funny when people judge without actually reading the original source of things. I actually read the documents, because like with any post like this, people will use it as an excuse. Panache is her company, like DaytimeFan said. It pays her a certain amount of money every month, like a salery would, and it automatically puts away money for savings, pension plans, etc. The documents isen't her suing for anything, it's her accountant sending in her statements, her facts and papers, and saying that she'll swear under oath in court if the court needs her to appear.

Wow, Mitch, your post is just a bunch of words put together isen't it? At least try to be factually correct :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wouldn't or couldn't? Facelifts can have strange side effects :lol:

The fact is, all our favorite daytime divas are over-the-hill. Could Lucci make it in primetime? Yeah, maybe as the mother of one of the desperate housewives? Could Deidre Hall play a 40something mom? Uh, no, she's beyond 60. Could Erika Slezak be a powerhouse in primetime? Nah, maybe a power-pushing grandma. It's a stupid argument because they've all made their careers in daytime and that's what they'll always be embraced for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She won't be paying alimony at all. Rather, it's going to be the reverse. Her lack of current income is what's going to land Deidre the spousal support, plus she's got to underage kids that her ex will have to help support.

The documents she's filed are, like you point out, accounting documents. What I know Deidre's doing is laying her cards on the table so that she can, essentially, force her ex's hand when it comes to paying her spousal support and the division of marital assets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're right. But my point is that if Lucci was fired from AMC, she wouldn't have to go kissing Marc Cherry's ass or Shonda Rhimes's ass or any of those people's asses. It's pretty much been established that Lucci does AMC because she wants to do AMC. She has enough money to take her through another lifetime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, she's found another way to get her name out there!

No sympathy from this quarter at all. And, I have heard the same thing about her selective sweetness when it comes to fans.

I'm really tired of her STILL! She's off the show, and there are still ways to be tired of her. (Dodging all the righteous indignation that's sure to come).

I agree with the poster who says he/she feels sorry for the kids. Me, too. I just hope they're not being used as pawns in this mess, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow, I am glad to find the Dee Hall fan girls are just as wild as the Kim Zimmer fan girls, and just as humor impaired!

Don't fear, Dee has a ton of money (more then I will ever see) and will be able just keep the botox coming!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy