Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

That sounds good, but changing the public school system enough to equal a good private education doesn't seem very realistic to me. In some places it's all teachers can do to maintain order in the classroom, never mind teach to high standards.  I don't in any way agree with vouchers or any public money going to private education, but I don't think there is a lot parents can do take make bad school systems good (better, maybe in some cases). I'm not saying all public schools are bad either, it very much depends on where you live. Either way change takes a lot of time, effort and money and you can't force elected officials to prioritize something they don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5990

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3462

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Low performing schools are in low income areas, which is why so many parents choose to send their kids to higher performing schools outside of their own neighborhoods. A lot of the schools in wealthier areas perform so well because of good PTA organizations that can raise enormous amounts of money for programs, so interestingly enough, good performance can't always be credited to the school district.

 

Something else that seems to slowly gaining support among teachers is eliminating homework and focusing more on classroom learning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm a career changer and started teaching about 8 years ago. Taught in Chicago Public Schools for my first 7 years. Vouchers are no answer IMO. There are a lot of challenges, many being how understaffed and funded and overpopulated schools in urban areas are and how under funded schools in rural areas are. I have a couple of friends who are both Lutheran school teachers in rural areas and honestly they aren't that much better off in terms of funding. And many primary and secondary parochial schools across the country have closed also.

 

I agree about the quick fix. You can ask 10 education professionals and you'd likely get 10 different answers on where the problems lie and how to fix them. No Child Left Behind has been a failure, Core Curriculum, while a nice idea, does not have widespread support and has challenges also. But if we had people leading us who truly believed public education was important and were more concerned with that versus trying to privatize public schools through the failing for profit Charter model, we might actually make progress. European schools are facing many of the same problems we are barring Finland. The Asian students are beating us out but their culture is also a lot different. Our own diversity while a plus, does present unique challenges that many other countries don't necessarily have to face.

 

My own opinion, is looking at our college educational system, we are starting to see a lot of similar problems surface. 25 years ago Harvard University was graduating about 2% of it's students with straight A averages. Now it's 15%. Not one person can convince me our students are that much smarter, particularly when you look at how well public schools have not performed. Some of that is likely students attending our universities from countries outside of the US but that's not all of it. Part of the problem IMO is too much catering to students and parents who believe their kids are smarter or perform better than they actually do. I never really experienced it in the urban school environment, but in suburban schools parents basically dictate to the teachers how to teach and put pressure on school administrations to over reward their children. School boards are filled with inexperienced people who think they know more than education professionals and tend to cowtow to this pressure. It's not the entire problem, but it accounts for more than people realize.

Edited by JaneAusten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^ I hear you on the leadership front. So many of our politicians want kids in Christian schools being taught a specific dogma, which makes me sick. I think people have the right to send their kids to those schools if they want to, but it's not the job of the public to fund it.

 

Also, to change some of the problems in the public school system you have to tackle the problems some of these kids have at home.  If they don't have a stable home life,enough food to eat, healthcare and parental support, how can you expect good performance? The government could do a lot more to help at risk kids, but the Republicans will be blocking that for the foreseeable future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think there a lot of people -- too many people, in fact -- who want to destroy the government.  But, I would ask these people, what do you intend to do once you have, indeed, torn down everything?  Because, these people who you are supposed to represent will still need to be governed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

According to CNN, Trump's labor pick is having second thoughts. I'm not getting my hopes up but it would be a nice victory if at least one of these lunatics said "Screw this" and walked away.

 

ETA: I forgot about Monica Crowley being taken down by plagiarism charges. That was nice to see. She, like Kellyanne, has been a pox on the soul of America for years.

Edited by marceline
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They want to ignore the reports that have been coming out, the pleas from the HC industry, the fact that repealing this will likely cost over 2 million jobs, and they will be the ones responsible. I tend to concur it's not going away. They have no better plan. Maybe they can get those premiums back to being affordable if they start paying the insurance companies what they actually owe them versus undermining the law.

 

OT:

I'm watching President Obama's last press conference in tears. He's such a classy, distinguished, articulate, and yes elegant man. We have been lucky, regardless of some of his failures, to have this man lead us.  People don't realize how much he's going to be missed. And this is the last normal press conference we will see for years if not ever. And with someone who may be guarded with them but certainly not combative.

Edited by JaneAusten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Trump and Republicans....insults to the walking dead. and they are going to call it something else and take credit for it...that's all republicans do. and the stupid folks who vote for them act like they can't realize that...because "HE'LL BUILD A WALL TO KEEP THE ILLEGALS OUT!!" stupid asses....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That 10% lycra makes them very stretchy.  Plus, he's getting addicted to pain meds. OMG Imagine if EJ gets addicted to opioids manufactured by Titan, and uses Belle to form a class action suit (i.e. The Sacklers) and that's how they get back Dimera Industries ?!? 
    • From https://itgetsbetter.org

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Can someone please slap Lulu? More fast forwarding in today's episode. Are we ever going to get resolutions to the two murders and the two attempted murder cases? What sloppy writing. Today's cliffhanger ending sucked!!
    • EJ walks around in pain every day. How does he get those tight jeans on?  
    • She's at least ten years older than lil'Rachel, yet it feels unnatural for both of them to be so involved in other people's loves lives. 
    • The new mystery man from BTG.

      Please register in order to view this content

      Hopefully soon!
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Lol.  Me neither.  CM is in really good shape so I shouldn't make fun especially with his health issues, but like the tips were the most basic thing ever.
    • I also think Joey will end up Ashley's father. Joey made a comment that Nicole's marriage falling apart was similar to him but without the illegitimate child. Or something like that. But I'm wondering if he used the word "illegitimate" to differentiate intentionally or maybe Jan had the baby without telling him just like Leslie claims with Ted and that was why she was acting weird with Leslie. Jan could have still been "honest with Ashley" by telling her what kind of person her father is without telling her specifically who he is.  This could be another "revelation" down the line MVJ set up to keep story momentum going. We are led to believe Ashley is such a "good girl" and it turns out she's Joey's daughter. Maybe she will turn and not be so "goody-goody". Etc...another story point to go down.  When Leslie said she still had more surprises and stormed off, my first thought was Eva isn't really hers. This would explain why Leslie is abandoning "her daughter" harshly with all the comments of how can she do that to her own daughter. Eva isn't her daughter she's Nicole's, so she couldn't care less about Eva. They keep going on about the DNA test...for her father...no one has ever checked to see if Leslie's DNA matches. They just assume. Why? Because Leslie said so? Maybe this ties into the theories people have that Leslie stole Eva from the hospital (since she's already proven she can sneak into hospitals as a nurse) and raised Nicole's daughter, keeping her away from the "happy couple" until she used her to destroy their happiness when she pleased. She could have done it because she wanted her own baby with Ted and it was the closest she thought she could get to having his child. Eva and Kat being twins and having that "psychic" connection Martin mentioned about Kat calling out Eva from the get-go. Just rambling...but I love this show much and how it has me interested in finding out.  Does anyone care who Alexandre Dumas is at this point? Does anyone care if Liam lives or dies? Just saying... lol
    • And hopefully, we’ll see it again soon

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy