Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5989

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3461

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

He's had years of sex scandals and disgusting comments, but has been Teflon. What seemed to bring him down was the revelation that his office was having parties during 2020 lockdowns, lockdowns that were, unlike what went on in the US, enforced, and where a lot of people sacrificed (and a number of people died). They tried to tough through this, but a poor economy and increasing isolation from the rest of the world due to Brexit did not help. They began losing byelection after byelection (special elections), including some that the party had won by massive margins before that point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members


Okay thanks. I had read that but thought I might be missing something.  If they got rid of US officials for stuff like that, that would be a zillion people.

Shows the damage that Tr*mp did to America, that horrid stuff was accepted by too many people.

It's interesting that Boris would be brought down for a lockdown party, which is a bad thing for him to have done but not as bad as his other crap.

Well they couldn't bring Al Capone down for all his murderous mobster activity but he was convicted for some tax charges.  Whatever works I guess?

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes I think this is a case where the parliamentary system plays a key part. The party can force a PM out and still stay in power, which makes them more aggressive. This is one of the reasons why the Tories have stayed in power for 12 years (and why they did for 18 years before Tony Blair won), and don't seem likely to give that up anytime soon.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@DRW50 has put it perfectly. I would only add that it was a cumulative effect. One more scandal on top of a mountain of scandals, big and small, and no effort made to meaningfully deal with serious problems plaguing the country. The straw that breaks the camel's back, as it were. And in a parliamentary system, MPs sense quickly when the tide turns against the leader because they are the front line in the constituencies and could lose their seat. Taking the fall for Boris's awful decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Very shocking for a country where access to guns is very restricted, and which is pretty safe. Abe was a defining figure in Japanese politics for at least two decades. He had an entire economic policy ethos names after him ('Abenomics'). He was only forced to step down in 2020 because of personal ill-health and criticism over early COVID policy missteps.

Japan does have a few lone wolf incidents, which can be horrifying in of themselves -- carried out by young or middle-aged men oftentimes. The Financial Times article I read (below) had a picture of the suspect being brought down by a security guard (both wearing Covid masks, I note). Apparently the gun was handmade by the suspect. Hope you guys can get past the FT paywall to access.

https://www.ft.com/content/de7116d5-f68b-46c9-9681-368f97f7ad15

ETA: Another article with perhaps easier access:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jul/08/shinzo-abe-japans-former-prime-minister-dies-after-being-shot

Edited by Cat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The NHK news broadcaster has had an excellent livestream and is really the best source for news coverage. I have watched them for years. According to NHK, the perpetrator is a former navy member who has arms training, so it is not outside of the realm of possibility that he would have acquired some skills or at least cultivated an interest in making weapons, especially since acquiring guns in Japan is so difficult (for good reason). The perpetrator also claims that his grievance with Abe was personal, not political.

Abe left a huge imprint on Japanese politics but he was also a divisive figure. He wanted to shed Japan of its pacifist status, a status that he felt had been forced on the nation as a result of a sort of punishment for the aggression Japan exhibited during WWII and in the wake of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which still fuels a very active anti-nuclear weapons movement in the country, which often found itself at odds with Abe’s insistence that Japan have a militant that be fully trained and ready to act at a moment’s notice. In the wake of skirmishes with the Chinese government, not least of which surfaces often in the South China Sea, Abe was ever more insistent that his stance was the correct one. I don’t know whether there is any connection between the perpetrator having been in the military and Abe’s stance. I guess we will have to wait and see as more information unfolds.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Having spent some time in London in the mid 1990s as a student, I have mixed views about the UK. There were some things I enjoyed about the people that I found myself in the company of and some events that were profound to my education and development, but there were also some disturbing cultural and socio-political attitudes that I encountered there as well. And way too much of a sanitized WWII and post-war mentality. And even then, a barely concealed hostility toward immigrants and children, even grandchildren of immigrants, particularly those from former colonies. One of my housemates at the time, a Bangladeshi student, experienced a very scary incident. I myself was accosted by some weird guy (who was white) and was fortunately scared off by another one of my housemates and the incident left me in shock to this day (so much so that I had blocked out the incident until a few years ago). 
It is sort of scary to realize that it has apparently gotten worse since then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OMG! I watch NHK World (which has English-language news). Outside of the news, I find its shows about Japan very relaxing in an old-fashioned, comforting way, but the news is notable for its scrupulous 'just the facts' coverage and no apparent editorializing or It's Just MY Opinion stuff. They also have journalists spread across the world, and so a breadth of coverage on little-covered countries like Cambodia or Bangladesh, for example. I cannot believe I didn't think about its news stream earlier.

Abe was polarising and controversial as you say for his more assertive stance on all things related to military and Japan's atrocities during WW2 and its empire-building era. The Comfort Women issue related to Korea and China will always be a sore spot between all 4 nations, because Japan absolutely refuses to acknowledge its crimes in this era (apart from offering the women themselves some backdoor pay-offs over the years, which many refused). Until this is resolved, I don't know if these 4 countries (NK and SK both have beef with Japan about this) can ever go forward together. The issue runs deep because I know young Koreans and Chinese mention this a lot when talking about Japan.

I think Abe might have felt his stance on Japan re-militarizing was the right one. The US is still Japan's #1 ally, but there is a feeling that the bond has weakened. The is a small flicker of distrust over whether the US, post-Iraq, post-Afghanistan and post-Trump, would swoop in militarily if China were to actually invade Taiwan or NK were to launch a rocket aimed at a Japanese city. The feeling Abe and his cohorts would have is 'Better to be prepared in case Plan A falls through.' Abe definitely felt the rise of an all-powerful China was bad for the region and bad for Japan unless Japan asserted its own power also. 

The perpetrator having military training is very interesting. It begs the question what his beef with Abe actually was if it wasn't related to his policies/political direction.

I can only imagine how traumatic that incident must have been if you blocked it out for decades!

Please register in order to view this content

 I'm sorry you and your Bangladeshi housemate were confronted with such aggression. I have seen incidents transpire on public transport here that have been absolutely shocking over the years, and people would just look straight ahead and pretend it's not happening. It is only more recently that other people step in and put a stop to it -- most of those that tend to be young people, to their credit, a lot of whom actually do want to change the world for the better.

That post-war mentality you talk about is embedded so deep. I call it post-Empire, because there is a similar thing going on in France and other countries. The UK never confronted its colonial past. The 'colonies' devolved into 'commonwealth' and while most people felt that was a sop to the UK's declining power in the world, it helped to prop up nationalist pride and the feeling of 'we are still better than them! We used to kick em around.' Now, of course, rising powers of black and brown excellence across the world are kicking the UK around on the economic front.

I honestly don't know what the solution is. Having witnessed the collective self-suicide of Brexit, where poor white voters (pauperized by a decade of crippling austerity imposed by the Tory government) decided to punish "foreign workers" instead whilst simultaneously doffing their hats to their Tory 'betters' and giving Boris Johnson a massive mandate... I lost confidence in people and their propensity for rationality.

Edited by Cat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Introducing Genoa City's hottest story in Daytime: April and May are going to be a LONG edit lol. If there's enough demand I'll compile "Abbott Communications" as well.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Greg and Paige were an interesting choice for a couple.  I do think the lack of focusing on the generational differences hindered their long term potential. I think Laura had learned to keep her feelings close to her vest, especially after the hell she went through in her early years on the show.  The last scene of her trying to keep her tears inside as she drove away was the first time we had seen Laura really express what she was feeling after two or three seasons of her keeping her true self hidden from everyone.. even Greg.
    • I guess my hunch may be right about her. I'm still very split about it. My husband thinks she is a joke, doesn't like her acting and thinks she is over the top. At the beginning I liked her a lot... And I definitely don't agree with my husband about her acting... But still something just puts me off when Felicia is on screen. It's like they are pushing her to be this grand dame too much. It doesn't come out natural, but very staged and superficial. Wearing a head piece and a gown doesn't make you suddenly be that. In most cases it makes people look foolish... when they are still wearing a huge hat while sitting in someone's ugly kitchen talking about stuff. To me... the actress and character shine the most when she seems down to earth and talking through something troubling. When the fluff and glitz is less and the REAL is more. When they act like she is Joan Crawford that's when I start wondering what is going on. She isn't. And some of the wardrobe choices for her have been horrific.  Of course all of these impressions are personal ones and I don't claim to know what the character will become in the future or what it was when she started.  I'm only saying my natural response to her now.   Then I'll blame him too!
    • Mid 1979 to mid 1981 was A+ quality for the show.   I even found things to like about the show in the final year or so when the quality had somewhat declined.
    • From what I heard, the actress playing Leslie opted to leave so instead of recasting again.. they killed her off.   Holly brought it on herself by lying and pretending Christina was Ed's child.  Although I do think that Rita's actions with withholding that message from Ed weighed upon her.   Even though she won Ed in 1976, she realized over time that she never truly had him. There was no Rita/Tim/Evie triangle.  Tim and Evie dated after Rita broke up with him (which happened before Evie and her mother came to Springfield).  Ironically Tim did to Evie what Rita previously did to him... leading someone on that you're not interested in.
    • I mean, he is but he's also still an ásshole.
    • The most beautiful thing about getting into a new soap opera is getting to know the characters yourself and figuring everything out slowly. And EON is one of the easiest when it comes to that. Pretty soon you are so well oriented in who is who and what are their motivations. I only struggled with the episodes before Mansion of the damned started.  Then after that it's pretty smooth sailing.    
    • I don't hate Hayley but she would absolutely cry about falling for Jacob.
    • @BroderickThank you for the reply. Such acting that they Sharon Gabet and the actor playing Draper still played their relationship after it's over. I picked up on it even though I had no idea about their history. That's such good acting/continuity.  Raven has just moved to London and a custody battle is now brewing for Jamey.
    • Ha-ha-ha, I thought it was Marland who turned Mike into a jerk, but apparently not. I get that they probably felt the Mike/Leslie story had run its course, but they should have at least let them have a kid. Especially since they were soon ensnaring him in a storyline with a woman who couldn't have children (Elizabeth). Of course, no one could have predicted there would be a dearth of Bauers a few years later. I remember this! I remember Holly sitting by the phone, desperate for Ed to call so they could stop the divorce. I forgot it was Rita who never gave him the message. What a bitch. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       But, yeah, this is the Rita I remember at the beginning: very determined to bag Ed. I contend that Holly never, ever got over it, never stopped regretting that the divorce went through. I wish at some point over the years they had let Holly and Ed reunite for more than a brief affair. It feels like a thread that was left hanging. There she is! I was beginning to think I had dreamed up the Rita/Tim/Evie triangle.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy