Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yes. That was my first rant about him when the hearings first started. On July 27th, these four officers from the U.S. Capitol Police and D.C.’s Metropolitan Police Department gave their harrowing testimony. On January 6, the officers' actions caused significant physical and mental harm. However, they asserted that Congress owes them the duty to hold those in authority who may have encouraged or abetted the revolt accountable. And THEY DO.

I think of the officer who was left bloodied and screaming for help as rioters chanted "heave ho!" and they continued to try and push their way through the entry, and I think of Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, who died of natural causes the day after the riot on Jan. 6 after he suffered two strokes. I don't want to go further because it's going to get me heated, and I'm going to try to be civil.

This [!@#$%^&*]. Because of this selfish, self-seeking, narcissistic mother !@#$%^&*]. And all I remember the news reporters saying throughout the whole time of the insurrection, Trump was sitting in the dining room watching television for 2 hours. Well, that's certainly not the case. No. The DOJ needs to act immediately, but another (hopeful) part of me thinks that the House Committee are slowly starting to squeeze in. 

God. So much is going on. This, reproductive rights, voting rights, inflation, war in the Ukraine, etc. I'm mentally exhausted. And pissed.

 

Edited by Noel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    5830

  • DRW50

    5600

  • DramatistDreamer

    5288

  • Khan

    3202

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Something similar happened to an African-American teacher (or was he a Vice-Principal?) who was asked to remove photos of his wife, who is white, from SM. I think he was fired eventually, but the reason cited was parents upset that he was seen to be embracing a “Woke” curriculum. 

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

More on the Supreme Court decision on the EPA:
via the Guardian:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/30/us-supreme-court-ruling-restricts-federal-power-greenhouse-gas-emissions 

The U.S. Supreme Court just ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency does not have the authority to mandate carbon emissions from existing power plants.

The ruling could also have sweeping consequences for the federal government’s ability to set standards and regulate in other areas, such as clean air and water, consumer protections, banking, workplace safety and public health. It may prove a landmark moment in conservative ambitions to dismantle the “regulatory state”, stripping away protections from Americans across a wide range of areas.

The Supreme Court has sided with West Virginia, a major coal mining state, which argued that “unelected bureaucrats” at the EPA should not be allowed to reshape its economy by limiting pollution – even though emissions from coal are helping cause worsening flooding, heatwaves and droughts around the world, as well as killing millions of people through toxic air.


Comment from me:
The only workaround to save the environment is for congress and senate to agree on legislation to protect the planet. But Manchin hasn't cooperated because he's from a coal state. (and because he's horrible)
 

from the NPR link that @DramatistDreamer posted:
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/30/1103595898/supreme-court-epa-climate-change

Justice Elena Kagan, in a furious dissent, said essentially that the Court is making up new rules that contradict nearly a century of regulatory law. The text of the Clean Air Act, she said, clearly anticipates that the EPA will have to deal with new problems and uses broad language to allow that. The Court majority, she says, "does not have a clue about how to address climate change...yet it appoints itself, instead of congress or the expert agency...the decision-maker on climate policy. I cannot think of many things more frightening."

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel dumb that I didn't make the connection between the Jan 6 committee talking about witness intimidation and the need for a previously unscheduled hearing with Cassidy Hutchinson.

I thought she was there to ferret out the testimony of White Counsel Pat Cipollone.  The committee wants him to speak, but he could have used the excuses of attorney/client privilege or executive privilege to recuse himself.  However, I thought Hutchinson's testimony was being used to provoke Cipollone to try to refute her account of what happened on Jan 6.

Now I see that they used her to demonstrate how Trumpworld is trying to intimidate witnesses and defer justice.  Obviously, after today's reporting, the images of text sent about "him thinking about you" were sent to Hutchinson.  While I find it distasteful that this young woman who worked for such political deviants as Ted Cruise and Mark Meadows is being hailed for bravery, I appreciate that she was willing to share the behind the scenes defiance of legal authority that continues in Trumpworld to this day.  I just wonder why they didn't ask her directly about any messages that she's received from the former president's staff?

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy