Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6816

  • DRW50

    5988

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3459

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

As a voter in the US also,what strikes me about France vs the UK vs the US is that all 3 countries are dealing with similar problems (post-industrialisation, etc) -- and have similar, entrenched far-right (and sometimes extreme left) political forces. With US/UK, the centre-right parties responded by going further right and courting those far-right votes (Brexit with the UK Tories, Trump and the Reps). They felt if they didn't, another party or movement would render them obsolete. 

In France, what Macron did was to wipe out both the centre-left Socialist party and centre-right Gaullists in one blow -- by occupying the centre, point-blank. With policies coming a little bit from the left, a little from the right. This works fine for someone like me who likes balance in politics and doesn't like extremes. But by recouping the moderates, this left a void on either ends which were filled by the hard-left and hard-right. And it bred a hatred of moderation in general.

In a democracy, do you acknowledge that extremism exists? That it has a political right to express itself? Do you make room for radical viewpoints? Do you absorb them into your own, initially moderate party, and shift more hard-right or hard-left? The established centre is viewed as having failed people since 9/11 and all the crises thereafter, right up until today.

It's hard and complicated, and I don't have an answer to this. With the US, I fear the coming of an ideological fascism which does away with democracy and implements law which will codify once and for all a hierarchy based on race, gender, religion, wealth. 

 

And on that cheery note (!)...

IMO, Melenchon loves to be praised and feted. He also loves the idea of being kingmaker, with his portion of the votes a swayable force. That means he can dictate some policy without the responsibility of administering it -- or getting backlash for it. Melenchon's party La France Insoumise (France Unbowed) has resonated with a lot of young people and poor immigrant communities stuck in public housing estates isolated from everyone. It speaks to their feelings of being disenfranchised, despised (especially if they are Muslim) and forgotten. For that, I tip my hat to the young organisers of La France Insoumise, who went all over the place to talk to members of their own communities in large part, hear their concerns and formulate policies to meet those concerns. Melenchon has been able to take that vital feedback and promise fairness and justice, a level playing field, better public welfare handouts, improved living conditions, etc. He points to these campaign promises as proof that he is the Nice Guy and that his party is the Nice Party. Who wouldn't want to vote for all these things?

However, there is always the issue of How Do Make These Things Happen in a democracy? And How Do You Pay For This? The fact is, many working people are crumbling under the weight of an already-significant tax burden -- an issue the gilets jaunes movement raised in 2019 and 2020. So who pays? Can workers and small business owners afford to give up much more of their incomes? This is preventing people from saving for the future or investing in their businesses. And breeding resentment of those who pay less tax or 'choose not to work' by claiming welfare. Melenchon would no doubt raise taxes, he says, on the rich. The problem is, what is his definition of 'rich'? Back in 2017, Melenchon pledged to tax 100% of salaries of E+400K (roughly US$400K too). Most French people don't make this level anyway, but it would effectively cap all wage rises at this amount. Also a 100% tax on salary? Is not feasible in the real world. 

Consequently, I feel Melenchon works in the sweet spot where he can call for more to be done without actually having to enact his promises himself.

Moreover, until very recently, Melenchon was an admirer of Putin, and liked to dabble in dog-whistle anti-semitic conspiracy theories. He also believes in an all-powerful state to the obliteration of anything else. Personally, I don't believe in a one-party state controlling all the economic levers. It breeds egregious corruption, for one thing. So, I cannot vote for him.

Sorry for writing such a long-winded post!

Edited by Cat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No need to apologize, @Cat.  I always love getting the perspective on politics and other events outside our own country.  The US media can't seem to report on anything outside its' borders without bias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never forget it because I grew up around it. Things make a lot more sense when you remember the average IQ is 100. That means that 50% of the population has an IQ under 100. Add that to our poor education system and you see what you get. Now I agree with Momma Gump, stupid is as stupid does. I'm just saying people are not that smart. That's true everywhere, but at least in some countries the population is better educated.

Seriously though, maybe that dumb ass accidentally came up with a good idea. Border states might be overwhelmed but I think there are plenty of places that would gladly take immigrants right now. We do have a worker shortage, which I am enjoying immensely by the way.

Still, there are a ton of people on the border who need a place to go and I put that above the joy I feel watching big business scramble for workers and be forced to pay a living wage.  If Biden can declare an amnesty he should do that as soon as he can because God knows what will happen if the Trumpers get control again. Not that I'm sure Biden would even want to do that. He seems to have dragged his feet on some of these issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes. 

Please register in order to view this content

He seems to try way too hard. But then we have Lindsey Graham, so in all seriousness, even if he was, that wouldn't/shouldn't be an issue. But then, both are in a party that wants to send the gay community back to the 1950s, so I can only assume they hate themselves. (Well, Lindsey. Not sure if Cawthorn really is gay or bi. But it wouldn't surprise me.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Sharina?  @alwaysAMC I am glad you've kept writing about the Brent story all the way through. I think that Beaty may have had to briefly leave again, rather than scenes being aired out of sequence, but I'm not sure.  You are right that the reveals of Brent's various reasons for being what he was bog down the end of the story a bit, although based on what is to come in 1996 I still kind of wish Beaty had stayed another year.  I'd forgotten J and Michelle were tied to the end of the story. This J is generally just gross. I don't really remember much of anyone caring about Nadine dying outside of her family. The worst part was Frank just giving a rose and saying it was from Harley, which made me very mad at the time. I am not sure if Beth Ehlers was asked to return and declined. Luckily this is addressed when she does return.   I felt like it was one of those stories that was done via mandate - trying to keep the ratings gains they had, via more location shoots, more adventures, more secrets, etc. Tony, Annabelle and Jim were thrown in as they were meant to be important to the show at the time.
    • April 28: Leslie tells Eva "I know all about the Articulettes. Honey, please. I lost my virginity with Anita playing in the background, baby." Who knows what she meant by that.  I had assumed that it meant that the music was playing on a device in the background, and not live, but who knows. Leslie has spun so many tales.
    • I enjoyed Sally's story from her engagement to Peter all the way through to right before Majorca, so I would have a hard time giving that up for the sake of trying to make Amanda and Sam theoretically better. I thought the escalation of Sally's troubles from Donna's interference, secret love child, engagement to David for the wrong reasons, falling for Catlin, jilting David, trying to take Kevin from David leading to David's murder and Catlin's absolutely stupid confession to take the blame for her, and then Catlin's trial and aftermath all kept the story moving in directions you wouldn't necessarily expect but all made sense.  Full disclosure: I don't really care for location shoots on soaps where most of the time outdoor scenes are clearly in studio. It feels weird to see the cast in natural light under real trees and sometimes the destination doesn't make any sense. And although obviously it was good to get a resolution to the murder mystery and get Catlin off death row (probably too harsh a sentence for the crime), the motive and the criminal were not very satisfying. Even though she had started dating Peter, Emily Benson still had minor character written all over her. But also the transition into a lower key daily life, the introduction of Brittany and the recasting of Sally were all less effective. Catlin was limited to occasional private detection work and being protective of Brittany, but he didn't have much else to do once Blaine and Larry had left. (He should at least have been dealing with raising Kevin but Kevin and Liz had also been written out. He could have interacted with Donna more over Brittany but his fling with Donna was mostly ignored once Sally was gone.)
    • This. I'm also reminded of something from the old Cinema de Merde website, something I've tried to carry with me. "(paraphrased) We will not let our dislike for a movie impede our efforts to engage with it."
    • I just edited a DAYS episode 8-27-90 with Eve, Nick, Julie, John, Izzy, Victor, Bo, Carly, some young guy named Chad, Johnny Corelli, business men/thugs from a movie that is going to be made & from a construction company, little kid friend of ShawnD's, ShawnD although he is at the bottom of a long narrow hole & is either asleep or unconscious. Full closing credits with voiceover: Next on Another World: Vicky, posing as Marley, will she be able to fool Jamie? Then, on Santa Barbara something about Mack & Gretchen, whoever they are. 
    • It's a sweet scene. I'm requesting Love of Life, please.
    • Paul, as for me, in general I am VERY interested in reading these. So, from my POV, you could post one every week & I would be all smiles. As for what shows I would be interested in: everything but Valiant Lady, Portia/Life, 5 Daughters, Another Life, that's it.   
    • I have read numerous places on line that Leslie/Dana may somehow be connected to one of Anita's old band mates that she obviously has issues with.  They were both from Chicago and Leslie/Dana stated she gave birth to Eva there.  If this is true it could add another dimension to this storyline.
    • Not only that, but Tony, Annabelle, and Jim had zero skin in this game. The Fishing Trip story had a huge impact on the Reardons and Annabelle because it was about THEIR relatives and how what happened to them shaped their own lives. People directly and indirectly affected by this--i.e. Alan, Amanda, Philip, and even Lujack--weren't involved in this at all, either because they were off the canvas or involved in other stuff. I mostly admire Long's talent for using the past to enhance her stories in the present, but this one was a huge turkey. We saw Brandon old and decrepit dying on screen. Even if we were able to suspend disbelief, why wouldn't he have wanted revenge on Lucille, who tried to kill him? If he wanted to go live with his Barbados squeeze, who would have cared about that by then? In the end, it had little to no impact on the larger story because they were too chicken to bring in that branch of the Spauldings into the main story (until later).  Just a really bad storyline that mainly existed to stretch out the GL stints of the actors who played Tony, Annabelle, and Jim.  
    • Agree to disagree as to Lois's return. Moving from the specific to the general, IMO, successful: Tracy, Lois, Lulu so far & Lucas so far. Questionable: Lucky. But I do not believe that having a romantic partner at all times is the be all & end all of things.  Reminder about how we got from there to here with Rena: Everything was a part of the great unknown, whether they'd like her or vice versa, so they by intent signed a 30 episode deal. Before they even got to the end of those 30 episodes they knew they really liked each other a lot & so they with mutual satisfaction (we think) agreed upon a handshake open-ended deal, which as far as anyone knows is how it still stands. What is good about that? Neither side has YET wanted it to end. What's bad about that? Maybe it is a little weird.  Now, it seems to me that Lois is not going to have time for anything or anyone at all EXCEPT the fallout over the GIO reveal for the upcoming future days & weeks & I do think she is going to take the brunt of a LOT of people's anger. In a way that has begun this week with Tracy being SO UGLY to her.  About Jason & romance. They're not writing any. If I understand what he's said from that podcast they never had any intention with either Anna or Sasha. Also, if they had wanted to write either of those, he would've been against it, although he realizes it's not up to him. (Finola has expressed same at fan events, etc.) (Others who have similarly stated their "preferences": Sonny does not want to be with Carly. Carly does not want to be with Sonny. So, these preferences Jason, Anna, Sonny, Carly, they all work out & none of them is having the show want those pairings either, so, again, works out.  About these writers & romantic couples, they spent a year blowing up every couple that existed. Now a few months has gone by & they have YET to create even one new couple. The only thing that has come close is Lucky & Liz. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy