Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5990

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3462

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Obama is now more popular than Reagan was at the end of his Presidency. After so many Reagan leg-humpers seething and seething and claiming Obama was ripping off their hero, this puts a smile on my face.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/07/barack-obama-is-now-viewed-more-positively-than-ronald-reagan-was-in-1988/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe Obama's popularity has something to do with Glenn Beck declaring that Obama has made him a better man?

Please register in order to view this content

Could some of these people be trying to get their 'souls right' at the 11th Hour? What's the deal here???

 

GLENN BECK TRIES OUT DECENCY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is a really good Vox article about the problems Trump has exposed in our democracy. I think they really nailed it.

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/7/13532178/donald-trump-american-democracy-weakness

 

A narrow Trump loss is another way of saying a near Trump win. A 3-point victory for Clinton implies that if Trump were merely a bit more self-disciplined, if he had not bragged about sexual assault while wearing a microphone, if his opponent’s pneumonia had lingered a bit longer, America would be ruled by a cruel narcissist with authoritarian ambitions. It will mean that if unemployment were a few percentage points higher, if the man who murdered two police officers last week had been brown rather than white, if Trump’s odd-bedfellows alliance of Russian hackers and angry FBI agents had been a bit more effective, Trump would have won.

Perhaps, on Tuesday, we will dodge the bullet. But we will still need to understand how we came to be standing in front of a gun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Beck is likely a savvy operator looking for a new angle now that the Blaze is going under. Arianna Huffington also changed her spots. That being said, he has been consistently anti-Trump. When his beloved Ted Cruz betrayed him, Beck's rhetoric turned increasingly sympathetic and reasonable towards the Obamas, and very very slowly perhaps towards Hillary now.

 

I don't trust him and I think he holds a share of responsibility in creating the Trumpist white supremacist movement. If Lee Atwater or George Wallace can repent then I am potentially willing to believe Beck, someday, not yet. I think he's looking out for his bottom line. But I have found myself stunned to hear him giving reasonable commentary in recent media appearances. If it is his new act he's good at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Beck is both a huckster and messianic. It's much more like the '30s (which we may be back to soon enough anyway...) than most modern day shills. It makes him out of touch and confusing and also dangerous. I do think he's out of step with the Breitbart wing that now controls most of the GOP, and I wonder if he may eventually be part of a third party movement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wonder what people think is going to happen to conservatives and I mean people who are real conservatives after this election. And to me a real conservative goes back to someone like Nixon minus the racism, southern strategy, and paranoia. More like a Rockefeller type. And I do think there are many out there who do believe in less government, lower taxes, but still believe in investing in our country. I have found myself paying attention a bit more to Evan McMullin. He's obviously too conservative for me, but I do like how he talks about America first, wants to reach out to disenfranchised Americans(minorities), not that his policies necessarily jive, but I wonder if there is a place for more thoughtful reasonable conservatives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If there is they have to find the balls to fight for it. Despite learning the same lesson three elections running they still can't kick the habit of being obsessed with short term wins. They're addicted to those and therefore unable to accept or expunge their racist base. Unless they're prepared to lose some elections for at least 4-8 years - and I mean more than the presidency - they'll never recover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

A lot of things will be masked thanks to gerrymandering, luck (the Senate 2018 map is tough terrain for Democrats), and general anti-Clinton fervor. I guess the question is whether raging misogyny will be as potent as fear and rage toward a black man, which helped the GOP ignore their identity crisis over the last 8 years. And media involvement. The media worked overtime to push the Tea Party and try to convince voters that they weren't extreme or dangerous (even though they were), that they were just everyday people who wanted less government and lower taxes. The same is likely to spring up again now. 

 

The other question is how much power the Koch Brothers, who powered so much from 2010-2014, will have after they took a powder this year and are clearly at odds with the Breitbart wing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Lol.  Me neither.  CM is in really good shape so I shouldn't make fun especially with his health issues, but like the tips were the most basic thing ever.
    • I also think Joey will end up Ashley's father. Joey made a comment that Nicole's marriage falling apart was similar to him but without the illegitimate child. Or something like that. But I'm wondering if he used the word "illegitimate" to differentiate intentionally or maybe Jan had the baby without telling him just like Leslie claims with Ted and that was why she was acting weird with Leslie. Jan could have still been "honest with Ashley" by telling her what kind of person her father is without telling her specifically who he is.  This could be another "revelation" down the line MVJ set up to keep story momentum going. We are led to believe Ashley is such a "good girl" and it turns out she's Joey's daughter. Maybe she will turn and not be so "goody-goody". Etc...another story point to go down.  When Leslie said she still had more surprises and stormed off, my first thought was Eva isn't really hers. This would explain why Leslie is abandoning "her daughter" harshly with all the comments of how can she do that to her own daughter. Eva isn't her daughter she's Nicole's, so she couldn't care less about Eva. They keep going on about the DNA test...for her father...no one has ever checked to see if Leslie's DNA matches. They just assume. Why? Because Leslie said so? Maybe this ties into the theories people have that Leslie stole Eva from the hospital (since she's already proven she can sneak into hospitals as a nurse) and raised Nicole's daughter, keeping her away from the "happy couple" until she used her to destroy their happiness when she pleased. She could have done it because she wanted her own baby with Ted and it was the closest she thought she could get to having his child. Eva and Kat being twins and having that "psychic" connection Martin mentioned about Kat calling out Eva from the get-go. Just rambling...but I love this show much and how it has me interested in finding out.  Does anyone care who Alexandre Dumas is at this point? Does anyone care if Liam lives or dies? Just saying... lol
    • And hopefully, we’ll see it again soon

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Weights? Really? I would've never known!
    • Don't worry I recapped them on the thread for @Taoboi, so you can read them when you are interested.  Weights are good.  Crazy I hadn't heard that before

      Please register in order to view this content

    • As most rugby players are. WOOF!!!   FINALLY!!! And WORTH THE WAIT.    
    • I'm not saying he was right. I'm just saying he wasn't screaming. I hope we see him apologize on screen.
    • Incline walking Weights  Sprints. I just saved you that click on the article.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy