Members JaneAusten Posted October 5, 2016 Members Share Posted October 5, 2016 Well all the press is at least calling Pence a liar. And even Chris Matthews acknowledged that this was more about Pence 2020 than Trump 2016 because he knows Trumps going to lose. I thought Kaine did what the campaign wanted which was to attack Trump. I never expected to hear any policy discussion. There hasn't been much yet anywhere. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cheap21 Posted October 5, 2016 Members Share Posted October 5, 2016 Funny you say that bc I thought he clearly won. Pence was awful; worse than Donald. Kaine annihilated him and really brought out light just how flawed the Trump ticket is 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members marceline Posted October 5, 2016 Members Share Posted October 5, 2016 Apologies. I'm frustrated with the lack of seriousness in this election and in the commentary I'm reading this morning. I didn't mean to take it out on you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DramatistDreamer Posted October 5, 2016 Members Share Posted October 5, 2016 (edited) No problem @marceline, I didn't mean to come off as cavalier but I guess early in the morning, my initial post may have come off dismissive, which was not my intent. Having sat up and watched this debate, I was hoping that there would be more probing questions and responses. I think I have to just accept the fact that we're at this point in our politics where debates will resemble verbal jousting or one candidate constantly making funny faces while the other person speaks. The last couple of President election cycles, it seemed as if the conversations and topics were so much more substantive, now 'looking President' seems to have taken on more importance than actually answering questions about policy. I definitely feel your frustration. I know that the MSM definitely has a large role in framing the context and circumstances in which these debates are taking place but I also wonder what the general public's role is in all this- in terms of the tone? In other political news, Governor of NY Andrew Cuomo is now being tangentially implicated in the Bridgegate Scandal. Cuomo ordered halt to Bridgegate probe after talks with Christie, former Port Authority executive says One of Christie's former aides had already accused Christie of knowing about the bridge closing, albeit after the fact and doing nothing about it. Between this and the possibility of a gas hike in NJ, I think Christie is done once his term is up. Edited October 5, 2016 by DramatistDreamer 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Gray Bunny Posted October 5, 2016 Members Share Posted October 5, 2016 Agreed. The last time a VP debate was Must-See-TV, we had this hot mess: Please register in order to view this content I'm fine with a ho-hum debate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Roman Posted October 5, 2016 Members Share Posted October 5, 2016 I was looking for the same policy discussions. a chance for Pence to answer for his hatred of gay & Lesbian Americans and the legislation and money lost by his decisions. to see if Pence can say anything concrete about healthcare, social security, rogue police, etc. nothing....because the moderator was horrible and it devolved into a shouting match. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members dragonflies Posted October 5, 2016 Members Share Posted October 5, 2016 LMAO I read Pence threw Chump under the bus, is that true? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DramatistDreamer Posted October 5, 2016 Members Share Posted October 5, 2016 (edited) I thought the Joe Biden, Paul Ryan debate had a mix of actual substantive issues but of course, Joe Biden can't help but be fairly entertaining at times. I erased the Palin/Biden debate from my memory. It wasn't substantive. Joe was too busy trying to be a gentleman and held back and Sarah Palin was too busy winking or whatever she was doing. Given Palin's disastrous interview with Katie Couric, I had very low expectations, not so with this debate since neither Kaine nor Pence could ever be considered as new to the Beltway. For me, Kaine and Pence didn't offer anything substantive but that's simply my opinion. I will say this, I saw a lot of reports wondering whether Kaine was 'born to be mild' or whether he could be the 'attack dog' some in the press claimed he needed to be (I disagree with them, Hillary doesn't need an attack dog). Kaine showed that he has no problem going on the offensive so maybe the jokes about him being someone's doting, overeager stepdad should stop now. I'm guessing Conservatives felt relieve because Pence should them that there was at least one sane person on the Republican ticket. One so-called undecided voter (are there really any undecided voters at this point??) pointed out that although he appeared stable, Pence is not the one running for President though. At this point, I'm not sure if any moderator can keep the debate flowing on an even keel. Maybe the ones that have been selected this time around are too close to MSM, that already have their narratives that they want to continue. Maybe choosing a journalist that is not connected to the American MSM? Are there any U.S./American journalists at the BBC or CBC? Someone from the U.S. who is well versed in U.S. politics but not too intimate with all the news outlets here? Edited October 5, 2016 by DramatistDreamer 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Juliajms Posted October 5, 2016 Members Share Posted October 5, 2016 And yet they are trying to sell this guy as the sane one. Honestly, this is so offensive and completely f*cked up. As if the government has any right to tell women who have had miscarriages how to grieve or women that have had abortions that they have to jump through these hoops. It's just sick. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members marceline Posted October 5, 2016 Members Share Posted October 5, 2016 I think that moderating is an impossible job when you're dealing with people like Trump and Pence who lie without reservation. To have to fact check someone like these two would mean that for every answer they give you'd have to spend several minutes explaining why it's false which means we'd hear more from the moderator than the candidates. For all the shade Lester holt got, I think he did a pretty good job. He tried to fact check Donald on stop and frisk and Trump just kept repeating his lies about how murders are up. At this point the conflict is between facts and letting the candidate speak. That was something I thought Hillary did well. She didn't ask Holt to fact check but she did invite fact checkers to weigh in after. Unless moderators are given the ability to cut microphones there's no way to moderate a debate with a pathological liar. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ThePrinceOfSunspear Posted October 6, 2016 Members Share Posted October 6, 2016 Kaine won on substance but lost on style. He came across very hyped up on coffee. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ms. Quartermaine Posted October 6, 2016 Members Share Posted October 6, 2016 Apparently this was in one of Powell's emails... I would rather not have to vote for her, although she is a friend I respect. A 70-year-old person with a long track record, unbridled ambition, greedy, not transformational, with a husband still d**king bimbos at home. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members marceline Posted October 6, 2016 Members Share Posted October 6, 2016 If that's how he talks about a friend he respects, I'd hate to see what he says about someone he doesn't like. Any bimbos being dicked by Bill are most likely well-paid escorts. I don't mind. In fact I hope that Hillary has a similar stable of options available to her. She deserves the stress relief. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Juliajms Posted October 6, 2016 Members Share Posted October 6, 2016 He's not exactly breaking any news with this, so I don't think it will hurt her. I also see Hillary as extraordinarily ambitious. She wouldn't be where is if she weren't. I don't see anything wrong with that. I'll also agree that she's not going to transform anything, but with Trump running, the status quo never looked so good. As for Bill, well, if he couldn't control his impulses when he was literally in the oval office, there is no reason to think he's doing so now. Again, I don't much care under the circumstances. I expect HRC to play blocker against the republicans, more than I expect her to actually get a lot of her own agenda accomplished. If scandal comes along that shouldn't stop her from blocking the way it derailed Bill Clinton's time in office. At least, that's my hope. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted October 6, 2016 Members Share Posted October 6, 2016 (edited) Bill Clinton is a frail man. If he wasn't at the time of those e-mails, he is now. I imagine many still see him as the chuckling fat pervert of '90s sketch comedy. He's clearly not anymore. If he is whoring it up, I doubt he's doing it very often, and I imagine we would have heard more about it by now if there was more proof. I saw some trying to make hay out of some guy claiming he's Clinton's son - to me that type of stuff is usually about as believable as those claims from some random years ago that he was Obama's gay lover. For years I still heard people insisting Obama was gay because of that. Silly stuff. Speaking of Bill, I read some article today blasting Hillary for picking Kaine because she already had an ideal surrogate and campaigner in her husband, so she needed to choose a dynamic voice for Bernie supporters and to build the party up. It just reminded me again about the past glories of Bill compared to what he actually is. He wants his wife to win and he's still effective with a number of voters, but he can't be what he was, and her campaign seems to realize that. Edited October 6, 2016 by DRW50 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.