Jump to content

Dark Shadows


DAMfan

Recommended Posts

  • Members

No, I do not think so. Nancy Barrett was originally submitted to test for Victoria, not Carolyn, and even Barrett admitted that she was wrong for the part. I thought Nancy was perfect for Carolyn and Moltke was perfect for Victoria. The problem was not in the characters but in the way the parts were written. Alex simply wanted something meatier to play, less naïve, and well, less thick. I think Carl is right. The contemporary writing up through 1967 worked well, and I feel it worked because the writers incorporated real emotions and struggles into the fantasy aspects. After 1967, characterization largely took a backseat to special effects and plotting. This is where Dark Shadows began to fall apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 726
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I think that Ms. Moltke was right for Victoria and that Ms. Barrett was perfect for Carolyn.

I especially enjoyed Carolyn during the time that Elizabeth was in the hospital, having been put there due to a type of spell placed by Laura.

Carolyn had always been somewhat passive in family buisiness, and Roger needed her approval or signature on some papers. Rather than continueing to be pasive, she took an interest in the situation. She refused to sign anything until she understood what she was signing, and she stood up to her Uncle Roger (who had always called her "Kitten").

Art Wallace or Frances Swann only allowed for an episode or possibly two, then, when Elizabeth returned to Collinwood, Carolyn acted the same way ths had, with a heightened curiosity about her father and a hatred for both Jason and Willie.

The writers should have allowed the independent Carolyn to have remained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That was a fun time. I remember when she was dating the motorcycle guy, Buzz, with the immortal line of dialogue, "I dig Buzz! He digs me!"

I wasn't fond of the early Carolyn stories, with Burke, but that story made her come into her own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It seemed like when Barnabas became a breakout character, all efforts to write for the other characters went by the wayside... I remember in one episode after Jason Mcguire was exposed, he and Vicki had a confrontation at the Blue Whale where he made mention that he regretted not staying in town long enough to see Miss Morality (Vicki) fall from grace...and asked her who she was and where she came from... hinting that he knew something about Victoria's past, but wouldn't give any details.

Nothing was followed up on... I think that Vicki's past should have been the next story to run at the same time as the Barnabas story...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the home was suppose to be a wedding gift to them by Elizabeth, but there was a clause stating that only a member of the Collins could reside in.. It was a 100 year clause.. and they were several years away from the clause expiring. Elizabeth stated that once the clause expired, she would give them the house.

I bet that the plan at that time was still to have Vicki be Paul's daughter, not Elizabeth's daughter. I read a blind item that Art Wallace & Dan Curtis clashed over that very story.. Art Wallace wanted Vicki to be Paul's daughter, while Dan Curtis wanted to go the Elizabeth's daughter route.

I think by the time Art Wallace had left, the focus was primarily on Barnabas, Julia, and on Vicki to a lesser extent. She would mention being an orphan all the way through the 1795 story.. but not sure if she discussed being an orphan once the 1795 story concluded or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Regardless of who wanted what in management and despite Jon Frid's breakout status, I felt TPTB should have been more accommodating to Alex. She really was not asking a great deal from the production. Would it have been so difficult to make Victoria less clueless and occasionally give her an alternate character to play who was less saintly? I think it was a mistake to let her go so easily. The scene in which she (Alex's Vicky) is in her wedding gown, hugs Joan Bennett, and says "Collinwood will always be my home" is so poignant to me, because it's the closest we ever really get to Elizabeth and Vicky sharing a real mother and daughter moment. I am saddened at what could have been but was not.

Edited by saynotoursoap
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They seemed to sort of shrug off both Moltke and Joel Crothers (who could have played a great heel if they'd let him - I wasn't a huge fan of the Nathan Forbes story, but he played it well). Perhaps they saw them as part of some old guard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always saw Victoria as the everywoman of the show, when Alexandra left the show, I think a part of the show died with her leaving. Despite the show attempting to replace Victoria with Maggie, Roxanne, and Daphne... it seems as if Victoria was a vital piece that couldn't be replaced.

Why else would the show have gone to Alexandra to have her come back. I'm sure she would have agreed to come back as Victoria if she was given another character to play at alternate times.

It wasn't as if she was asking for a pay increase, just a new challenge,.

Edited by Soaplovers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A few years ago the was fan fiction online from an author with the non de plume Charles Delaware Troll. He/she wrote a full year of daily DS episodes beginning April 5, 1971 and running through April 1972. It was a "what if" scenario assuming the series had not been canceled by ABC. The story was quite good actually. Victoria returned in one of three story arcs played out over the twelve months, and The writer gave Alex her wish of playing something meatier. If a fan could have given what she wanted, Russell and Hall certainly could have, too.

I agree with Soaplovers. At least to me, Victoria was integral to DS. The story was seen through her eyes. It was she who opened the series before we ever even saw Collinsport, Maine or its inhabitants. The series was never quite the same after she left, and killing her so cavalierly offscreen in another time band added insult to injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Members

John Karlen is apparently ill and in a hospital/rehabilitation center.

From Marie Hentz Maginity: "John Karlen is at Studio City Rehabilition Center, 11429 Ventura Blvd, Studio City, CA 91604 in Room 10. Adam (his son) says our guy could use some major cheering up so everyone please write a letter or send a card."

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=622419927770738&l=fbb2ae0dae

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The poor man. All my best.

I do agree that after 1795 or maybe the initial Quentin story if you're being generous, the individual personalities and lives of any character who was not Barnabas, Julia, Quentin or any of the monsters or at times the kids largely fell by the wayside. Nancy Barrett always infused Carolyn with so much fire, but not much of it was on the page - Joan Bennett, Louis, Katie Scott, etc. all did what they could with what little they had for Liz, Roger and Maggie. And it's a shame because when you do watch the early years of the show these characters were all full, layered and rich. It always felt to me as a teenage viewer that when the show lost Alex, as well as Joel Crothers and David Ford, it turned its back on so much of that. (Mitchell Ryan was also fantastic as the original Burke, a force to be reckoned with, but he took himself out of the equation.)

I think had the show wanted to survive it would've had to transition to somethng more soapy, more on par with Edge of Night. I remember the idea being floated by online fans of having Roger and Julia fall in love - using Louis Edmonds as a witty, urbane rival to Barnabas for her - which I think, shockingly enough, might have worked. It would have required making Roger into something other than a clueless buffoon for the first time in years, but hey.

I will agree KLS was forced into a square hole to try and make Maggie into Vicki. But I think she did a very solid job of it in the 1968 Quentin story. She was a trouper no matter what, but she so rarely got to show what she was really made of as an actress. I loved Virginia Vestoff as Samantha but I do often think about what Katie could've done with that part, a la Kitty Soames only spikier.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always thought DS should have toned down the supernatural a little bit and amp it up during the summer. During the rest of the year they could focus good old fashion Gothic stories soaps love to tell with a few supernatural happenings. That would have been good for the writers to take a breather from the Supernatural so the summers would be a lot fresher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • What I wouldn't give to have any of Jordan's run as Tim surface.  I wish there was more of early '81 online. It would be fascinating to see Alan/Rita play out. I guess I'm too set in my ways...I'd be horrified at a Van/Alan marriage. Not that it wouldn't have been great to see more of Chris Bernau with Maeve.   
    • This leads to one of my favorite scenes ever...I won't spoil it but it is a very clever meta moment unmasking Brent to the cops...(it may have happened.) Also you already saw one of my favorite lines..."You, you think I'm a LESBIAN???" even crazy Brent is shocked that Lucy is that dumb, and only crazy Brent would be pissed at being mistaken for gay instead of being a psychotic rapist /killer.   Hate that scene, made both adult women look like morons. Amanda is way too subtle for that, I could see her egging emotional Blake into doing that and making a fool of herself in front of everyone. The whole story would have been more fun if Amanda was manipulating Blake to look like the Blake of old.   One of McLaiby's biggest mistakes is what they do to Bridget, who grew up since having Peter and loosing Maureen and running a business.I remember Liabson saying in the press..."The Bridget we know is back" but that was over, and being more adult does not mean you have to be boring..she was even less feisty here, she just looks pathetic.    This story is so gross... and too bad too, cause Griffin is sexy as hell. I can see Viv getting steamed on him but....   There is a spectrum of sexuality that some people can go in and out of, depending on special people they may find attractive...and we can leave it at that. I never trust the long distance girlfriend boyfriend but I hope he is happy and settled. I would have HATED the Abby storyline. He raped and killed too many people to be "reformed," and to have anyone in SF accept him or trust him after that would make them look like morons.  
    • Eva convinced Nicole to have the party -- due to Leslie/Dana's insistence that there be a party when they do their planned dramatic reveal. They haven't specified which anniversary it is for Ted and Nicole. How many years have they been married?  It's not 10, 20, 25, 30 or some specific number that you'd celebrate. Kat pointed out that there was no plan for a party until Eva instigated it, which indicates to me that it's some odd number of years.
    • Why is Billy such a wet rag in every scene he's in? Isn't he the same man responsible for the disastrous Chancellor Remodel back in 2016?
    • Okay, after reflecting on Mucas overnight, I suggest we cut to the chase & call them  SNOT You have to admit that it would be different!
    • Part of me feels both Jacob and Naomi might show up at some point today. As "late arrivals", etc.
    • MVJ seems to be cognizant that Leslie and Eva are true breakouts for this show:

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Yesterdays episode was a great lead in the fireworks for today.  It is a shame that Naomi and Jacob are not there and Nicole's best friend Vanessa and Doug.I am interested to see the fallout from this.  I do think that Eva is Ted and Nicole's daughter.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy