Jump to content

Texas!


Chris B

Recommended Posts

  • Members

@j swift Thanks for your insights and observations.

I think Texas fans would be au fait  with story and want more bts stuff as would those readers who are not neccessarily soap fans, but interested in the workings of tv in general .

Of course some context needs to be provided.

But overall Texas stands as a testament of how not to launch a soap. 

Kind of parallel to Silverman's primetime bomb Supertrain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 578
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Just finished the Texas book and figured I’d share my impressions. As a fan of Texas from the first episode to the last, it was a joy to revisit the show and the characters and storylines that entertained me in my late teens. I’m especially appreciative of the interviews with Pam Long, Joyce Corrington, Philip Clark, and John McCafferty. The book reminded me of my crush on Clark, and the wonderful friendships of Iris & Vivien and Ruby & Lurlene. It also reminded me of how incredible McCafferty was in his performances as Billy Joe. I really loved learning about the friendship of Pam Long & Gail Kobe. And I loved the fond memories it brought back: laughing as Ruby and Lurlene tried to dispose of Beau's body, terrified for Lurlene as Bubba attacked her, the nail-biting scenes of the Marshall Ranch burning to the ground.

Unfortunately, I didn’t find this book as engrossing as the recent Ryan’s Hope book. Overall, I felt like I didn’t learn much new and kept wanting more. For instance, I wanted to know more about the Corrington’s plans for Reunion. Did they reuse any of Reunion’s bible for Texas? I would like to know more about Pam Long’s plans for the show, including the introduction of a Hispanic family. Besides the Phillip-Beth storyline, did Long reuse any of her other planned Texas stories on Guiding Light? I was also baffled by a few things. Why is there no mention of Entertainment Tonight announcing the cancellation of Texas around April 1982? I clearly remember how devastated I felt when I heard the news and the elation the next night when Entertainment Tonight reported that the show would continue. (I can’t recall if NBC had changed its mind or if was Entertainment Tonight’s mistake in reporting the cancellation.) And sorry if this seems nitpicky, but as a writer/editor, I have to say that the book would have benefitted from close proofreading and some fact-checking. There are so many typos that I found distracting. Ginny is referenced as Jenny. Names are misspelled. Punctuation is missing. Another character is referred to by the wrong name on multiple occasions. The hospital is incorrectly referred to as Gold Coast Hospital. It was Gulfcoast Hospital, a nod to Houston being close to the Gulf of Mexico.

And I was so freaking proud to see @antmunoz in the acknowledgments!!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Although I haven't finished the book, I am also disappointed more of this type of stuff isn't included.  For instance, I'd like to know what other plots the Corringtons had planned, that were either nixed by tptb, or they didn't have time to get to before being fired.  I'm pretty sure Maggie Dekker had some kind of secret that likely involved her nephew, Rikki.  Was he really her son rather than nephew?  There were hints of something between these two characters that was completely dropped when Maggie was abruptly written off.  I'm sure the Corringtons had an entire list of upcoming plots when they were fired, and I was hoping to learn about those.   As I said, I haven't finished the book, so maybe some of the things I'm looking for are included.  But I'm not hopeful.  

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm was surprised to hear how fast the Texas book was published. I had assumed it would take a good two years to be written and published. But it seems like this was written and published in under a year. Just reading the two reviews above, it sounds like this was a rushed job, when it shouldn't have been. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The book very briefly touches on Maggie when she was written out in September 1981. I think there's one sentence that says that a dark storyline had been planned and that Maggie may have been a prostitute or madam.

The stuff about Paul Rader's stint as head writer is quite interesting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not planning to buy or read the book. I'm curious what was written about Rader/Flescher as they were brought in (suspiciously) three months after the end 1981 writers' strike (probably when Pursuer/Radcliffe's contract was up). Never heard of them. Rader stayed as a breakdown/scriptwriter until cancellation. I think Pam was only head writer (officially) for about 8 weeks at the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

According to Carolyn Culliton, Paul Rader was a novelist Gail Kobe discovered and decided to hire. With no daytime experience, he ended up writing the show longer than any other head writer. Kobe picked up a copy of his 1969 novel, Professor Wilmess Must Die, in an airport and decided to hire him as head writer. Jeff Ryder said that Kobe's decision to hire Rader was unexpected and that he wasn't impressed with Rader's story projections. Gerald Flesher worked in advertising and was hired as the show's story editor. Gary Tomlin suspects that Flesher was writing the show during the 1981 writers' strike.

Long wrote Texas longer than the last eight weeks. Rader was credited as head writer during some of her run, possibly because of contractual reasons. Long states that the fire at the Marshall Ranch was her work but apparently Rader was credited as the head writer. Rader did join Long's writing team writing outlines but didn't last because he didn't know how to write outlines. He quickly left the show.

One of Long's plans was to restore Billy Joe to his bad boy ways.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Tom Lisanti's work has inspired me to write my own book: "Where the Ratings Ain't: A Comprehensive Oral History of CBS' Groundbreaking Soap Opera 'Where the Heart Is'...As Told by the Few Who Still Remember It."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just got my copy of the Texas book. I haven't started it yet but although I knew it wasn't likely I had hoped for an index so I could jump to specific topics if I wanted to. Serves me right for buying a hardback rather than a searchable ebook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I finished Tom Lisanti’s book and I really enjoyed it. I love that the cast and crew still have such love and respect for Texas after all of these years. The timing of the book’s release was perfect for me as I am rewatching Texas on YouTube.  I am currently watching episodes where Elliot Carrington and Jeb Hampton have just been introduced. For me the show is starting to find its groove. The Tanquir story is over, Paige is scheming, Reena and Max are fighting their attraction to each other, Dennis’ paternity is about to blow up and some unlikeable characters are soon to be written out (Dawn, Clipper). I believe that if the Corringtons had been given a full year they may have been able to get the ratings up a bit. Although they really wrote a lot a violence against women. It’s a bit uncomfortable to watch.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I read the whole thing, and I wholeheartedly agree. I'm 46 and didn't see it in its original run, but I was really curious about all the BTS stuff like you are. I mean, giving a storyline by storyline breakdown was not really interesting and certainly didn't push me to watch the show's run on YouTube. Honestly, I wanted to learn more about how Texas influenced 1980s Guiding Light, which I have fond memories of growing up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I found this part to be hilarious. On the surface it sounds mean, but those that have worked with Beverlee have said she had a wicked sense of humor. I'm sure this was done tongue-in-cheek while still getting a point across. 

I, too, wish there had been more focus on backstage drama going on. There definitely seemed to be enough of it. As someone else said, Texas seems to be a blueprint for how not to launch a soap. Starting a new show already in progress (with its stories starting on AW) had to have been a turnoff for non-AW fans tuning for a chance to watch a new show at the beginning. (Think BTG recently.) It seems the show was doomed from the start. 

My biggest memory of Texas was the Hitopah storyline and Brette being in the cave to get the Fire Compass only to have legions of snakes fall on her while retrieving it. I was 9. It terrified me, but I loved the Indiana Jones type of story. I was surprised to realize the head writer, Rader, had been hired to write the show because of a random book Kobe plucked out of an airport bookstore.

I know some people love Kobe, but she didn't come across to me like someone who knew what she was doing. Randomly hiring completely unexperienced writers for the show (Rader, then Long) doesn't seem wise. Although, I guess Long turned out okay. Kobe also seemed petty with actors. Not utilizing someone like Kin Shriner because she felt he wasn't behind her or the show seemed stupid. Wasn't there a comment she was afraid to focus on Courtney/Jeb because if they became popular it would just be a bigger loss when they left? Umm...you're at the bottom of the ratings. Is it worse to have attention on a couple for a month than not at all. The show needed attention! And who is to say Kin Shriner wouldn't have stayed if he felt utilized and had story? He admitted he loved living in New York.

Didn't Phillip Clark also get ignored once it was known he was going to exit at the end of his contract? He was moved offscreen. Ryan and Ginny were arguably the most popular couple on the show and you just sideline Ryan instead of using him while you can? 

I also noticed Harley Kozak make the comment that she had nothing juicy to tell about anything behind the scenes of Texas because they all genuinely liked each other, but if she had been asked about Guiding Light....   PLEASE, someone ask her about GL

I loved the new direction Texas was going in the last year. Probably because Ruby became my favorite character and I loved the Mark/Ruby/Rikki/Brette quad. And, of course, I loved the Reena/Justin/Ashley triangle. If only they could have been given more time...(without being moved to 11 am.. Yes, the share went up, but viewership went down.)

Edited by Melroser
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm going to respond to you about this show. I've been accused of hating on it for some reason or another. But as a 53-year-old black man I do not hate this show at all. It heavily represents people like me, but I want it to be treated well and not just pushed with half-assedness, which is what I feel has happened on several occasions so far. Bad editing, bad cliffhangers, or no cliffhangers at all, disappearing characters with dropped storylines, etc. I can understand shows no longer wanting certain characters or  storylines, but why the "Judy Winslow" effect?
    • I love many things about BTG very much. For me, it's greatest strength is how the family relationships are so beautifully written. The deep love between family members while acknowledging each other's flaws--it's SO GOOD.  The best of the best is the two sister relationships: loving but very different sisters Dani and Nicole and adversarial sisters Kat and Eva. These two relationships can anchor the show for many years to come, in my opinion. (The one caveat is that the young and very talented Colby and Ambyr may want to leave the show sooner rather than later, but that's to be expected). My biggest problem with this show is this: Where are the romantic love stories? Where are the star-crossed lovers? Almost every character on this show is married, or in a committed relationship, or just fooling around. Right now the only potential for this are in the Ashley/Andre/Derek and Kat/Tomas/Eva situations. Like a lot of people, I feel the sooner they ditch Ashley and Derek, the better. I hate picking on actors, but the characters are so blah and bland it's like they're a parody of soap characters. I like Andre, and there's some indication they might have him become more serious about Dani, but I don't see that becoming a big love story. I could be wrong. Kat and Eva fighting over a man would be amazing. Over Tomas? No.  I've noticed on social media some people are starting to ship Kat and Jacob. I think that shows how much viewers long for a messy love story. There is much I enjoy about BTG and I have no intention of bailing on it. But over all my many years of watching soap operas, the thing that always got me the most excited about them was the question: "When are those two finally going to get together?"
    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 11/26/73-11/30/73 & 12/3/73-12/7/73:

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

        Some initial thoughts.   1) a Who's who back in the day with an assortment of well known performers. 2) Surprised Debra Messing would agree to play a conservative character 3) Not surprised a network didn't pick this up because showing a conservative that is human/likable is a no no in Hollywood LOL
    • Yes from when they went on Let’s Make a Deal too. Pam stole Forrester designs for Jackie M. Of course a month later we saw Nick, Lesley, Owen, and Bridget all exit in the same episode.
    • Great pairing that seemed to come out of the blue! Around that time, it felt like Sheffer/Goutman didn’t really know what to do with Emily or Hal. And KM and BH had surprisingly great chemistry. It was good for Emily especially because she was coming off those unsympathetic years with the Tom affair and then running the Intruder and essentially just being a busybody.
    • I think the issue with Lulu is less the character (which was the issue in the Julie Berman days under Guza II) and more the lack of nuance. The current GH team rarely writes nuance for any character or at least can't sustain it for long, or they reserve it for a favored few. I also think the rooting interest at GH BTS often remains on preferred characters or actors - BLQ/Setton - vs. Laura's kids. So it's easy to make Lulu the heavy if you think Brook Lynn and Chase are the money on this show. I don't, but I think FV does. And that's not to say I think Amanda Setton is bad in the role, or that I would get rid of BLQ. I don't trend towards either (though I do think that if Setton's personal beliefs keep getting in the way of material I would reluctantly recast). I think Brook Lynn is essential to use as a lead presently. But I don't think it needs to be the black and white dichotomy of suffering young matriarch BLQ and aggressor Lulu. While it's good that unlike in the Guza years they can recognize that Lulu can be obnoxious and rash, can be her own worst enemy and that that is part of the character, it can be toned down or given more layers than it has of late. There's nothing wrong there the writing can't fix.
    • 1999: I just watched it. It felt so primetime. La Lucci is making history. Aretha's daydreaming segment. @Contessa Donatella Thank you, my love. So helpful and informative as always. adding them to my queue.
    • I know this isn’t a usual or anywhere near universal take, but I loved the relatively brief Hal/Emily relationship/marriage more than I ever thought I would have with KMH/BH.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy