Jump to content

DAYS: Ed Scott FIRED! Gary Tomlin HIRED!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

In terms of Scott's entourage (Foster, Maxam, etc)... let's face the reality of the situation. The only way I can see them leaving is if Scott gets another gig. It wouldn't make sense for them to leave their job purely out of loyalty to Ed (that would just be silly), OR for them to get fired (as far as we know, none of them were involved in the WGA problems). And the last thing they'd want to do is create MORE transitions in a show seemingly permanently-in-transition.

Then again, this is the show that fired nine writers in one fell swoop. Why not nine producers and directors? Oy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 215
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Or if David Shaughnessy is rehired as Y&R's EP. Shaughnessy and Foster were BFF's. *Crosses finers*

Anyone notice the similarities between Lisa De Cazotte and Ed Scott? For years Ed Scott was relegated to producing Bill Bell's show, and he never had any direct influence on the storylines, because you don't f-u-c-k with Bill Bell. When Bill stepped down, he tried so hard to impose his vision on Y&R, which pissed Kay Alden off royally, and then she got his ass fired by going directly to Bill. :lol:

And then again at DAYS, Scott tried so hard to impose his vision on DAYS, by going as far to rewrite material. Whether Dena is a hack or not is another issue.

Judging by his falling out with Alden and the situation at DAYS, Ed Scott doesn't seem like a "writer's producer."

Of course this is related to Liza because she was to Jim Reilly what Ed Scott was to Bill Bell for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think he's good at technical producing, but he's shown at more than one time he wants to have too much power. I may not be the biggest Kay Alden or Dena Higley fan in the world, but he did alter their writing to the point where both women had to go to higher-ups to get him fired. And as much as certain actors like him, I've always heard some pretty unflattering things about the guy as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True enough. I stand corrected.

I just wanted to debate the whole "they'll quit/get fired because Ed was fired" argument. People need jobs, especially in this economy. It's not like it's all that easy to find a daytime gig these days. Or to find people who know what they're doing to replace them if they're fired. Maxam and Foster have impeccable reputations, and I can't see them getting fired or quitting... at least until their next contract cycle, and if the new EP just wants to work with his friends instead of people he might not be familiar with.

But you're right. I didn't think of the Shaughnessy angle.

Thing about the Shaughnessy angle though -- Y&R has shown they're not exactly going back to the talent pool that put them at #1 in the first place. But hopefully, I'll be proven wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Well, Frons liked her enough to hire her for Night Shift. Maybe she's on the short list for the next opening at an ABC soap? She has the AMC/OLTL connection.

I hope Maxam stays, he's a fabulous director. But I think he'll be fired when his cycle his up and I wouldn't be surprised if he was immediately fired the way Roy Steinberg was fired last year when Ed was hired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So, what if Ed Scott became accredited by the WGA as a writer as well as an EP? Then, suddenly his crime would vanish?

Forgive me, I am just a longstanding viewer of both Days and Y&R. And I liked what I saw of Y&R when he was EPing the show and *loved* what he did with Days. IMO, he is a large reason why the show has come back from the brink.

Hollywood is filled with cross-pollination of this kind. Seems like everybody is an actor/producer/writer in one. You only have to look at the credits of your favorite Primetime shows to see half the main cast involved in production (and sometimes the writing). Matthew Perry on Friends is a famous example of joining the Writers' Room every week. Aaron Spelling pioneered this on 90210 of all shows, getting some of the vet actors behind the scenes in the producing and directing. To get them invested in their show and widen their backstage experience.

So why is this not OK on Days? Why are there calls for Ed Scott to be drummed out of the industry?

If it's good enough for the goose, then it is also good enough for the gander. Not to pick on GH (even though I hate the fact that it has been systematically DESTROYED all these years) -- but the showrunners over there have pretty much admitted that Jill Farren Phelps wrote a lot of the show during the writers' strike. Heck, Seamus Dever (who played Dr. Devlin) confirmed this in an interview to the soap press. Last I checked, she was Executive Producer, no? Now, there again, I much preferred what she put up on screen than Guza's "vision." I know I'll be flamed for that, lol.

But I guess "that's just the way they do things at GH," huh? GH is celebrated for letting its actors (MALE actors, that is) improvise a scene. Sure, perhaps that's not changing the writers' original intent. But what about when Maurice Benard and Steve Burton refused to play a scene which would show their characters coming to blows over Carly back in the day? TPTB acquiesced and the whole SL was changed to accomodate the two actors' preference. I don't think it is the first time that ever happened, either. Angel Boris, anybody?

All I'm saying is... I think people are being rather hard on a talented EP (of which there are few and far between right now) who may actually be doing what is standard practice in the industry. I personally think it would be a shame for Daytime to lose his kind of expertise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, which leads me to be very perplexed. I find it strange that both Scott and Griffith were fired last Friday, per Nelson of course, yet DAYS named its Co-EP replacement within the same day. Y&R, on the other hand, didn't seem to have anyone lined-up for the EP position after Griffith's firing. I think Corday was planning Scott's firing for months, and Tomlin might have secretly have been his back-up plan.

Shaughnessy is loved by the Bell's and the actors and crew on both Y&R and B&B. I think it were up to them, they wouldn't want another outsider running their flagship soap.

However, who will seriously replace Griffith? There's been almost no speculation on that show Sony, CBS, Bell clearly didn't have a replacement when the axe fell on Griffith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is interesting actually. There are some claims that some Y&R writers (e.g., folks like Houghton...but I'm not sure if Houghton) aren't interested in going back. The idea is that there are other ways for them to earn a living, they feel undervalued, they don't see a long-term future in daytime. I was a bit incredulous when I first heard it, because I have a hard time seeing someone say 'no' to a paycheck...but I guess for some, the Y&R firings REALLY stung.

This is germane to your post because it really does seem that some people are making these "next step" decisions on non-economic grounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We didn't know about Maria Arena until the day she started airing. (I realize that was strike mode, but still...). Thus, Y&R will likely just spring someone on us.

ALTERNATIVELY, they are going to be slow and careful this time....which means the position may be vacant for a time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

JFP wasn't writing entire storylines with the help of actors, the way Scott and his pets were at DAYS. It's one thing to tweak a storyline or ad-lib dialogue, and it's another thing to completely alter an already written storyline and essentially write your own storyline when you aren't a WGA member.

Scott, from what we're told, was rewriting the whole show, and what makes it worse he was rewriting it with an actor who also has no WGA affiliation.

Scott might be a good technical producer, but as I said before, he's shown in the past that he can be power-hungry and is not a writer's producer.

The WGA strike is one thing, but Scott was pulling this when the strike was OVER. Who expects WGA members to write during the strike? Unless their scabbing (like Dena allegedly did), or go Fi-Core, no one affiliated with the WGA is going to write a soap, so it's known that producers have to step up to the plate in that instance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • 6-3   I almost let my system just delete the episode just like with B&B. I am now questioning if I should have. lol.   I just can't believe that Cole sat there and started to get sick and then only Victoria off and ran off and everyone basically went back to what they were doing at Nikki's birthday party. Cole was too much of a vet character for that. And now story back off-screen.   I did chuckle at how much Victor pay Kyle dust. And now Kyle with this deal and a promise to leave town if he hurts Claire. smh. As if Victor isn't going to make that happen.   It was lovely to see Ashley. And actually (misdressed and all) Abby.    And I liked Claire's dress. 
    • Oh. That. I pretend that never happened.

      Please register in order to view this content

      I did think of another possibility. Did India ever sleep with Alan? They kind of toyed with pairing them up, but I'm not sure they ever became lovers.
    • While I do love the chaotic energy that is Kat vs Lesile, it is a bit extra. Sheltered, virginal Kat who plays it safe from her man to her wardrobe understands that Leslie is dangerous, but she's out here showing up everywhere and anywhere that Lesile is to be found and actively going to places where she is alone? I mean Kat doesn't even act a little afraid or intimidated by Leslie. Meanwhile, big Ole Derek out here begging for his and Ashley's life to Jacob.  As for Dani, I didn't see it that way. Dani and Bill were together for 30 years and shared a family. I believe there was real love there at one point. Bill is still an ass and Dani is still crazy, but realizing she may lose him and her daughter's may lose their dad definitely struck a chord.
    • Funny I randomly saw Kami’s lengthy post about the 44th anniversary of the Walton’s finale last week pop up in my news feed on Facebook. A few inaccuracies to her post but overall it was pretty insightful and interesting to read. 
    • Well, depending on rewrites...Jennifer Richards potentially slept with Brandon and Alan. It does feel like we're forgetting someone, but then again, maybe I'm confusing that with brothers, which would include a lot more.
    • Maybe it’s me, and the fact that RC isn’t at the helm, but since Cwikly and Ford have taken over I’ve noticed the show doing a lot of things differently directing wise, and since the storyline of John’s demise began, the show has been using different scores, and dare I say better ones than this time last year. It’s interesting and I wonder if the any of it is Noel Maxam’s influence before being promoted.
    • I think Nicole is about to figure out what's going on between Andre and Dani.
    • @Efulton thank you. I don't know how I missed it or didn't recall it.  I'll blame amnesia . Anyway @Errol Could the newer thread be merged to the existing? Thanks in advance.
    • I just finished watching and I have to admit, not once did I find myself wondering who wasn't there. Quick question for anyone who followed this better than I did: was it only Andrew who rescued Cat and John from Clyde, or was Shane involved too? The reactions during their scenes today felt a little off to me. I know it was meant to be vague, but I didn't find it strange that they already knew each other.  
    • Yeah, financially, Luna is in better shape than Deacon and Sheila.   -- Scott Clifton must have decided to chew the scenery in every scene of this "Liam is Dying" storyline. Yikes.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy