Jump to content

Loving/The City Discussion Thread


dm.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

It's bittersweet watching the epilogue of the Loving Murders. And the wrap up of the series. The City had great aesthetics. But the stories were lackluster. Sydney Chase was an unlikable cold fish. Not the type of character to anchor the series. The City does improve towards the end. With the arrival of Queen bitch Tracy Q. 

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by victoria foxton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wonder what would have happened if, instead of sending Jane Elliot over to TC, they had sent Susan Lucci?

 

 

At the very least, they could have sent them over to OLTL after TC had been cancelled.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

We wouldn't have gotten the baby stealing story (which was more suited to The City anyway, probably...), so that would have been something. That period feels like a lack of ideas on what to do with Erica. 

 

 

Debbi still wanted to play a character who was unsympathetic. I remember a letter in SPW taking her to task for wanting to play a bitch, and how that had already been done with Dominique on Dynasty, etc. but I can see why she tired of the heroine role. Of course Ellen was never that unsympathetic, so if those were plans they changed early on. 

 

 

Heinle was wonderful as Steffi, which is the only reason I had as much goodwill as I did for the rest of her lackluster soap career. I've heard people say she has finally improved as Victoria in recent years - I wouldn't know as I don't watch it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Exactly.  Erica was in a bit of a rut by the time LOVING had morphed into THE CITY -- and I say that as someone who has worshipped at La Kane's stiletto-heeled feet his entire life.  Moving her from AMC's Pine Valley to TC's SoHo might have been just the thing, both for Erica, and for TC itself.  PLUS, I happen to think she and Buck would have been FIRE as a couple. 

Please register in order to view this content

 

 

Sigh.  If only Agnes Nixon had thought of it, I'm sure Susan Lucci would have graciously agreed to join TC (while still making occasional appearances on AMC, of course) as a favor to her.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

No, it wouldn't have been.  But, this time around, they could have had Erica return to NYC in order to -- oh, I don't know -- assume the reins of a high-powered modeling agency, or something.  You know, just so it wouldn't feel like a rehash from her last residency in Manhattan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

At the very least, I think bringing Susan/Erica over to TC, with her built-in, loyal audience, might have helped TC buy more time to establish itself as a viable show.  As it is, they tried to launch TC with Morgan Fairchild, who (no offense to Morgan or to anyone else) hasn't been relevant since the mid-'80's.

 

 

True.  Plus, by most accounts, Lucci is wonderful to work with.  Unless Sarah Michelle Gellar and Lee Godart had joined the cast, I think TC's cast would have had a much easier working relationship with her than they did with Morgan Fairchild (who I adore but, let's be honest, has never had a series or role that ran for very long).

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Above, I said "Vanessa needs to go to therapy to find ways to remain healthfully lusty and sex-positive, but to stay away from anyone who would demean her." Now adding onto that thought, I would clarify that sometimes I think Vanessa fools around for fun in a positive way.    But other times I sense that she's actually unconsciously trying to demean herself as way of numbing some inner pain -- it's hard to explain what I mean.  Sort of like... sometimes people drink for fun. But other times, people drink  in a self-destructive way, in order to drown out some inner pain. So I think she needs therapy about all of that.
    • A lot of these episodes are available on YT. The rape storyline starts around February or March of 1979 and Roger's demise is sometime in March 1980. The stuff from before 1979 is close to non exisitent, unfortunately.
    • Maeve Kinkead was on from 1980-1988 (left in January); 1989-2000 (went recurring 1996-97); 2002 -For Josh /Reva's Wedding; 2005 (appearances in May and December) back regularly from Feb 2006-end Maureen Garrett was on from 1976-80; 1988-2006 (recurring from 2003 on); 2009 Michael Zaslow was on/off from 1971-1980 with breaks in between but usually made an appearance every year then again 1989-1997. There is a youtube commercial  Guiding Light in 1968

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Holly's final big story was the Sebastian mess in late 2004.   Vanessa and Matt were promoted to regulars near the end and were heavily recurring prior to that starting around 2007/2008.
    • Keith has a softer presence, but it would have helped to see him be more aggressive or proactive in protecting them instead of standing around like a mannequin. A man the audience should be hoping and wishing gets back together with his wife. Nicole needs a new husband!
    • She needs to learn to be honest with her husband about her lusty interests because being sex positive only works if you're not cheating on your spouse.
    • https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1922782226317529409       https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1931204864136396907
    • Very disappointed in the writers in the way they are screwing with Nicole, Ted,  and Kat to make Leslie remain viable. So many holes everywhere.
    • Somebody brought this up elsewhere which emphasizes why this NuTed appears as such a weakling. Why is Kat doing what HE should be doing? And that's everything he can to rid him and his family of this crazy woman. Kat is doing all kinds of things she shouldn't do but now I understand her more. She can't count on her father to eliminate this woman because he's a wimp. He's been too busy inviting her into his home and serving her drinks and offering her invitations to birthday parties. WIMP!!!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy