Jump to content

AMC: Cady's Last AMC-related blog


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Actually, Ryan, the comment wasn't for you or any mod. Sorry if you thought it was a big deal. All I meant was that we , as fans, in my opinion, owe it to Cady to give her the hit to her site. I wasn't criticizing SON for posting the link. Or you. I just feel that we owe it to the original source to give them the hit. I've only seen Cady's front page so I don't know if it's advertiser-supported or not, but even if it's not, I just personally believe that we shouldn't skew her personal Web site traffic figures by expecting others to post the exact text in another forum. Again, no offense intended. I'm just looking out for Cady. Maybe i'm just especially overprotective of her due to her treatment by ABC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

GO CADY! I totally agree and LOVE her!!!!!!!!!!!! And thi practically confirms what I thought all along: She was fired because she spoke her opinion and it was the truth. Frons, Megan, and Julie didn't like that so they fired her because it's an important actress saying that the story is bad and a character is being destroyed instead of just the fans. Mctavish just used that as an excuse to get out of saying "We don't like you since you criticized my stories."

I don't know anything about how Julia felt, but this might have been why she was inclined to quit too. One thing was she probably didn't want to be on recurring but never appear like Opal, but perhaps, and this is merely speculation, she felt the same way as Cady. I think some actors/actresses hate the writing but they are just too nice to speak out. I appluad Cady for doing this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Its is sad that it has gotten to this point, really, no one seems to care where its going.

Megan is just as egotistical as Frons.

Her and Frons don't care about the audience. Its been pretty clear no one at ABC does or like someone said McTavish would have been canned years ago. Probably never re hired in the first place.

I will watch AMC until it physically dies.... I just sort of do out of habit. But Its been dying a slow death for a few years now and Dixie's death really sealed it for me just like the fetus did for Kylie and many others. I have my memories and I treasure them now more than ever. I find myself many times throughout the day thinking back a decade to the stories and am like OMG I wish they would just end the show and replay old storylines. That is what AMC was, a show that took risks, cared what the audience wanted and above all had the right mix of realism and over the topism that made it a truly great icon in terms of soap opera.

I will always remember and treasure that All My Children. This show has in alot of ways shaped my life and helped me through difficult situations. If I ever had a down period, I always had AMC to escape too. Now, the show more often than not frustrates me even more when I am in a down mood because of all the idiotic things going on, on screen and off screen.

Agnes Nixon, you truly did create an icon and I owe you my life for doing that. I don't know where I'd be without AMC. I will always treasure you and the show its self.

LONG LIVE ALL MY CHILDREN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really think that All My Children was trying to pull a "24" by killing Dixie off. "24" is notorious for killing off it's veteran characters, and while it may work for the Fox show it certainly doesn't work for a daytime serial like AMC. The characters are different; there are years of investment for soap characters. 24 has been been on for what, 6 years? Sorry, AMC, it was a bad decision. Killing off veteran characters could lead to a short-term increase in the ratings but if you don't have a true emotional story to follow through, then you just wasted your time and sacrificed years of history. Of course Megan and Julia have stated that the story of Dixie will live on in the lives of those she left behind. That's not the story that fans want to see and I think that AMC will realize this very soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Megan was so impressed with coming up with making Tad the torturer and killer, to make Tad/Dixie "even," that she wept at her own brilliance. Literally, she said she did. Cady complained about the story pretty loudly, according to her own words. Does that kind of gel with why the show is like even "dissing" (disrespecting) Dixie (Cady's character) in death?

No question, Megan loved T/D at one time. But McTavish love is dangerous, and she's never seemed to have a long attention span for "adoration" except (unfortunately for us, right now) with the Lavery and the Carey (and fortunately at one time T/D).

Julia Barr, IMO, decided not to stay with the show because the show disrespected her. They were not only disrespecting her with lack of storyline, now they were disrespecting her with only offering her recurring status. IMO, she would have stayed if they offered her a contract. After 30 years of important and incredible service to this show, she probably thought a contract was the least she deserved. And it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And people wondered why I feared her writing any kind of David and Erica scene. Becuase like Rugrat said, MMT's love, or even like of a couple is dangerous. Toxic. Especially when she's under Frons' control.

AMC is doomed. No one believed that a year ago with Josh, but it's true. Our show is done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree totally. She should get the same respect Susan Lucci gets. A lifetime contract with the show. Even with no storyline, Brooke was still there and you felt her presence. Any episode she was in was a good episode for me because it reminded me of how things once were.

And yes, Megan's love is a dangerous thing. She will ruin your character. Ryan, Bianca.... Kendall and now Tad and Dixie.

At least with no story the character of Brooke is still preserved and intact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

McTavish's and Frons' arrogance will destroy AMC.

People raked JHC over the coals when Cady was fired and I stood by her. I said then and I'll continue to say now that she was forced to do the dirty work of Frons and McTavish. They had her speak with Cady and they had her (Julie) speak to the media, so she could take the blame for what happened and people fell for it. I can't believe how many "I hate JHC" threads I saw on other boards.

JHC is the last remaining EP with any kind of talent and hope for the future. Frank Valentini is a pawn (and crazy for wanting Mikey Jerome to win SoapStar). JFP is the devil incarnate and should be on her way out. I've loved JHC for years and Cady's entry makes me feel sorry for her, knowing what they did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy