Jump to content

The Tracy Quartermaine Lovefest


razor32always

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • hookedongh

    6312

  • remos

    4086

  • Ms. Quartermaine

    3372

  • ILoveTracyQ

    1894

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

He hasn't always. A number of times he's been there just for her - I refuse to parrot the negativity about Luke just because he's not with who I think he should be with. The Anti-Luke-because-TG-hates-LnL crap on some sites is enough to many me puke.

I just want them to be solidly drawn on the same side. Tracy is certainly taking advantage of Luke's loyalty to her in this whole process. She's no angel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

According to mags Luke tries to get a drink and max refuses. Tracy wants to know why Luke is drinking again and they have a convo and end up kissing. Tracy stops it feeling like Luke is using her to fill a Laura void or something like that

I have heard rumbling lunacy are getting back as a couple but we shall see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hope/think TPTB are ramming home the whole "LnL are history" point. TG and JE have been quite a few places saying they've been promised LuNacy, so hopefully we will actually get it. Luke has certainly showing his loyalty even in the face of Tracy's harshness. Perhaps we'll get lucky and see the romance we've always been meant to see but previous writers never followed through with it.

Also, do we know that Luke was drinking alcohol? He always took Tracy's drink, and she never reacted, so perhaps the drinks were non-alcoholic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always thought the drinks with Tracy were alcoholic (after rehab). I think the writers just forgot that Luke shouldn't have been drinking, and that's why Tracy never said anything. Now that the writers remember, Tracy will question him about it.

I know I should haven't been laughing at Friday's scenes about the relish, but I couldn't help it. Tracy was so emotional, and it actually makes sense since that relish is one of the few things she has left of her father and mother. But Tracy sitting on the bed and crying over the relish was just funny to me, and I don't think it was supposed to be. Oh well...

helenaTRACYdorian of YouTube has added more LuNacy videos. It's really neat to see LuNacy videos from 2009 and beyond since mine were mainly 2005 to 2010. Luke and Tracy actually had pretty good, heartfelt scenes even after their couple days were over.

http://www.youtube.com/user/helenaTRACYdorian

And check out Tracy's lovely short hair here (:43 seconds in the "Just the Way You Are" video) It looks so soft, the bangs are good, the color is nice, it's a little oomphy, and it's just SO pretty!!!.

2w4hah2.png

wub.pngwub.pngwub.png

Edited by Ms. Quartermaine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I'll say it: I think Jane and Tyler have great chemistry. If there was just a little bit less age difference, I could go for it. He certainly has more spark with Jane than with Becky, IMO.

But then, honestly....BH to me has always played Liz so blandly that I have never found any of her pairings remotely "hot".

I did like the Lacy kiss we got recently, and I like that they seem to be getting closer again, but as someone else said, (was it Remos?) if they are doing Lacy again, they need to add the romance/wooing that has always been sorely lacking. Nothing totally sappy or syrupy or OOC, but enough so that it isn't constantly played for laughs. That is the only way I can support it.

Honestly though...if I can't get Tyler and Jane....I'd love to see Roger H's new character and Jane "hook up". I realize Roger isn't that much older than Tyler, so the age difference between him and Jane is still twenty years, but who cares? Not me. :) As long as whoever he is isn't wasted on Carly. He obviously seems to have something to do with sabotaging ELQ.

If he were a Paul recast, I'd jump for joy, but he's too young for that. Would love him to kind of have the same role as Paul in the beginning, though, that he's there with the pretense of helping save ELQ while really working against them. Which looks exactly like what he might be up to, anyway.

Oh, and how great was Tracy/Jane in the last few episodes? Kneeing Prince Nik where it hurts. I loved it. :)

And apparently using one of Alice's moves to put the other guy down. Awesomesauce.

Remos, thank you. :)

Edited by ILoveTracyQ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually RC came out on Twitter several weeks ago when people were up in arms about Luke drinking again, saying it was TG's choice to drink. "It was the actor's choice." It was not written.

I'll be so happy when this hot mess of a relish story is done. Jane has been great...the material has NOT!

Edited by halee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

TG makes a lot of 'actor's choices'. It's a nice way for TPTB to sidestep responsibility, but it also lets us know what kind of influence he does have. Does anyone remember years ago when he said viewers can also tell how he feels about the story he's in based on how he acts the scene, whether he engages or not. I had to laugh when he was with JE for a few days, life of the party. Then he does that [hopefully] last LnL scene and viewers were wondering if he was sick because he seemed so stiff and bland. And when we got back to the next scenes with JE, he was life of the party again. I don't think he gives a damn what the majority of nit-picky fans have to say anymore, he knows Luke's days are numbered - as are his on GH - and he's riding this one out his way.

Gotta respect the attitude regardless of whether you agree with the behaviour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

RH is actually a decade younger than Wally, who plays Ned. Which would work out perfectly if they wanted to say he was a baby Tracy had right before she came to town the first time, or right after she left. I guess we find out pretty quickly who he is, though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm screaming at those clips and gifs.  THIS IS PURE GOLD.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's always been my thought. I can't imagine that the show would play up the unseen AD so far in advance without them casting a *star*. After today's episode, I wonder if he'll somehow be connected with Diane. It was strange that Diane mentioned her very distant family today. I can't recall Diane ever talking about her backstory. Maybe he's her much younger brother?  It's also possible he's connected to Diane during her time in LA. Sally's already said she crossed paths with him. OC, I think Dumas is Mariah's mistake.... As a side note, it was good to see some mixing it up - Adam with Clare/Kyle and Sharon with Tessa.
    • Here's the place to share some memorable criticism. You don't have to agree with it, of course (that's often where the fun starts). Like I mentioned to @DRW50, Sally Field was a favorite punching bag in the late '80s and early '90s.   Punchline (the 1988 movie where she and Tom Hanks are stand ups): "It's impossible to tell the difference between Miss Field's routines that are supposed to be awful, and the awful ones that are supposed to be funny." -- Vincent Canby, New York Times. "It's not merely that Field is miscast; she's miscast in a role that leaves no other resource available to her except her lovability. And (David) Seltzer's script forces her to peddle it shamelessly." -- Hal Hinson, Washington Post. "As a woman who can't tell a joke, Sally Field is certainly convincing. ... Field has become an unendurable performer ... She seems to be begging the audience not to punch her. Which, of course, is the worst kind of bullying from an actor. ... She's certainly nothing like the great housewife-comedian Roseanne Barr, who is a tough, uninhibited performer. Sally Field's pandering kind of 'heart' couldn't be further from the spirit of comedy." -- David Denby, New York   Steel Magnolias: The leading ladies: Dolly Parton: "She is one of the sunniest and most natural of actresses," Roger Ebert wrote. Imagining that she probably saw Truvy as an against-type role, Hinson concluded it's still well within her wheelhouse. "She's just wearing fewer rhinestones." Sally Field: "Field, as always, is a lead ball in the middle of the movie," according to Denby . M'Lynn giving her kidney to Shelby brought out David's bitchy side. "I can think of a lot more Sally Field organs that could be sacrificed." Shirley MacLaine: "(She) attacks her part with the ferociousness of a pit bull," Hinson wrote. "The performance is so manic that you think she must be taking off-camera slugs of Jolt." (I agree. If there was anyone playing to the cheap seats in this movie, it's Shirley.) Olympia Dukakis: "Excruciating, sitting on her southern accent as if each obvious sarcasm was dazzlingly witty," Denby wrote. Daryl Hannah: "Miss Hannah's performance is difficult to judge," according to Canby, which seems to suggest he took a genuine "if you can't say something nice ..." approach. Julia Roberts: "(She acts) with the kind of mega-intensity the camera cannot always absorb," Canby wrote. That comment is so fascinating in light of the nearly 40 years Julia has spent as a Movie Star. She is big. It's the audience who had to play catch up. And on that drag-ish note ... The movie itself: "You feel as if you have been airlifted onto some horrible planet of female impersonators," Hinson wrote. Canby: "Is one supposed to laugh at these women, or with them? It's difficult to tell." Every review I read acknowledged the less than naturalistic dialogue in ways both complimentary (Ebert loved the way the women talked) and cutting (Harling wrote too much exposition, repeating himself like a teenager telling a story, Denby wrote). Harling wrote with sincerity and passion, Canby acknowledged, but it's still a work of "bitchiness and greeting card truisms." The ending was less likely to inspire feeling good as it was feeling relieved, according to Denby. "(It's) as if a group of overbearing, self-absorbed, but impeccable mediocre people at last exit from the house."
    • I tend to have two minds about Tawny (Kathy Najimy) fainting during Soapdish's big reveal. You're the costume designer, if anything, you should have known the whole time. I guess it's an application of what TV Tropes calls the "Rule of Funny." Every time I watch Delirious, I always want the genuine romance in John and Mariel's reunion at the deli counter to last longer. Film critics had their knives out for Sally in this period. I'll start a separate thread on the movies page.
    • I don't think so, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was Dumas this whole time.
    • Tamara Tunie was serving up grand dame diva fierceness.
    • Nick told Victoria that he and Sharon had married in England.  Victoria was shocked.  Then she realized he was kidding.  He confirmed it was a joke and they're platonic. I don't even know what to say about that.
    • It's funny you say that because part of the entertainment of the trials on the show are all the day players who come on as witnesses and jurors.  I'm certain it was like the Law and Order of its time. It employed so many New York actors, that if you look close enough, there's usually someone vaguely recognizable in the courtroom.
    • I will defend Dante.  People already suspect he may be a bit unstable from time to time (from his time as a prisoner).  And, he's taking care of other people's kids from time to time.  So, he has reason to be cautious with those in his care.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy