Jump to content

BTG: History, Behind the Scenes Articles & Photos


Errol

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I think the good news is the show is set in DC, but it's not Capitol. The political aspect is there but it's not the sole premise of the show. They started filming before the election results so presumably they wrote it without overt references to the administration. If the appetite to focus on politics isn't there, there's still plenty of fodder in a diverse soap that emphasizes class differences. If we look at the character bios again, there's several who aren't involved in politics and the ones in politics have other storyline potential. It was always a risk including it, so we'll just have to wait and see.

Edited by BoldRestless
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At best, I think CBS will offload the show to BET and replace it with "Wake Up America with Megyn & Candace."  Regardless, however, I think its' days on CBS as it is are numbered already.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I’m not with all the doom and gloom talk. As Lauren London once said “don’t focus on the future focus on the present” lol. Right now we have a black lead, black created soap opera being filmed and headed to airwaves next year with real backing. Lets keep celebrating that instead of manifesting negative outcomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Typically, I would agree with you about the displacement of politcian characters from their home space. I thought Frank Ryan's stories were limited because of the D.C. angle and thought ti was a mistake making Roger Forbes looking towards the White House. The smaller physical distance between the Maryland gated community and D.C. makes me think there is a more workable landscape here, but I may end up being very wrong. 

No need to apologize. I've read many, many posts by you over the years and know that you aren't the type of person looking to start a fight. I did want to address it because it seemed to becoming a bigger conversation and I thought I might have upset people. 

I think the justice angle is pretty embedded into the show with a cop son-in-law, politicians in the family, and multiple lawyer characters. The might jettison stories relating to life in the Capitol per se, but a pretty significant fiber of this series seems to be the connection to how law and order operates. 

If the NAACP remains involved, I don't see it disappearing. If they are bought out, I think that's a larger possibility. 

I think the main reason I don't see the political angle stunting BTG is because I many people are going to think that having a show featuring a predominantly African American cast is an example of CBS "trying to be woke." This isn't a show I thought that white midwestern housefraus were going to be gearing up to watch before the election, and certainly not now. I think trying to water it down is unnecessary because people who will be offended by the potential politics will be outraged that the show features at its core multiple African American women over the age of 40. It seems to be set in the Maryland/D.C. area for a reason. It could be set anywhere, but this is the location. 

 Then again, it might be worth noting that the Vanessa McBride character was originally an African American woman in the casting call articles online. So maybe there is already a bit of backtracking.

At 70, Dansby is not much younger than Val Jean. Neither is Judy Tate (69). Of the names I recognize, I suspect Danielle Paige is the youngest script writer with longterm daytime experience (she joined GL as part of their college writing program right?).

One of the Hamilton daughters, Naomi, the lawyer, is married to a cop, Jacob. He seems to come from a blue collar family. His friend, Derrrick, is a firefighter, and there is the nurse.  

I don't think it was stated implicitly, but the Thomas family may also be outside the gated community types. The mother Dana/Leslie is a waitress and the daughter is working as an assistant to Nicole Richardson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Location is one thing, but I feel like there's a limit to the conflicts that can be played out without representing the life in DC. I mean, it's fairly obvious that we're going to have the Senator father who is likely pushing his son to get as far as he can, while this is putting a stress to his home life since being a politician is time-consuming and everything you do is put under a microscope, so nothing is truly too private. But eventually they're going to have to resolve that conflict in some way before it becomes repetitive. 

But most of all, while I think politics in general is ripe for soap opera material, it's also an insular world in itself. That's why I think there might end up being problems if they're not really going to have a set of characters / physical sets to represent that - and that might end up causing issues with budget as it's hard to incorporate non-politician characters into that set too deeply and it might end up feeling like two-shows-in-one. There's a reason why soaps tend to opt to having their own businesses as you can always play musical chairs with the boardroom - not as easy in with politics. 

I don't know and I might be getting ahead of myself as the show hasn't started yet. But I could see it becoming an issue a year or two down the road as they'll run out of angles to play with it. 

 

As for the whole "they'll push it to BET"... let's see how it debuts first and how it performs on streaming. Ultimately, the audience CBS is trying to target hasn't gone anywhere regardless of election results and I'm sure they did a lot of market research before even contemplating on ordering a new soap. This wasn't done on a whim.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That is not going to happen. Those crazy bitches would get CBS sued into the poor house with all the libel suits they'd.

I cannot believe that some of you all have this show off the air before it has started. If anything it will be more successful because this is what a lot of people. Black drama exploded during the idiot's first term and post.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That was my point really. These anniversary party scenes are the first ones, and now they won't be able to use them (meaning these actual scenes, as aired, with OG Ted). They can recreate them but I doubt they will spring for all the extras to come back and film and recreate everything, so it will be more like tight closed in shots of Ted with one or two other actors, or snippets of Leslie's original speech where Ted wasn't visible. It would be hard to recapture the original energy of the scenes are as they were filmed in their full context. I just think that's too bad, but maybe they will prove me wrong. I never really saw what was so off in his portrayal to warrant a recast, anyway, so that colors my perception as well.
    • Yeah, and quite honestly, are there really that many scenes that are flashback-worthy at this point in the run?
    • I know at one point they were on Hulu & i-Tunes. I just checked it on JustWatch.com & it indicates 1 season on Prime Video & on AppleTV. Have fun!
    • That era is so weird...they made a big deal out of all three of those characters and then they just..disappeared! Not that I am complaining. We talk about the bad out of character writing for Alex under JFP..but this was one example that may have led them to write her being so obsessive with Nick.  WHY would Alex accept Flock of Seagulls guy as her brother? They had her in one scene (setting up the Alan return) complain that Alan abandoned her...she blackmailed him into leaving town and she had been angry at him for helping Brandon with Lujack and also using Spaulding for that dumb dreaming death thing. Endless scenes of her with Simon, I can't believe Bev wasn't bored to death! I would also add Pam writing the scene where she lets Ms. Sally die in front of her to protect Alan and  the writing for Alex could be screwy even before JFP.
    • On this day 34 years ago the final episode of Dallas and came in at an astonishing #2 in the ratings after two straight seasons of weak ratings. Interesting Knots was #27 for that week as well:  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thank you for clearing that up. I wasn't watching GL regularly yet at that point, but seems to me I should have remembered the big wedding after Leslie's death (which I do remember) described in the profile. Is there a web archive of SOD summaries, or are referring to your own personal collection?
    • I was bummed that 2.0 ended because Mcpherson (headwriter) had really set up some interesting stories and we never got to find out where the stories would go once they resumed production on 'season 2'. I remembered the EP (Ginger Smith) and a lot of the stars gave a lot of credit to McPherson being able to come in on very short notice and come up with stories/plots (I think it was a very short turnaround time of a few weeks).  It was nice that she got to redeem herself after her year long Days stint was not well reviewed/liked.
    • Enters                                 Speaks

      Please register in order to view this content

           
    • It seems like a setup for failure to review a single episode of a soap, but Cleveland Amory was a foolish man.  His taste was so predictable, that one wondered why bother reviewing a medium he so clearly disliked. (found on Facebook retro TV group) Another case in point of his misogyny from his review of Dark Shadows (Can you imagine the magazine with the widest circulation in the country insulting its customer in this way today?)

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • They could easily be re-created, or even re-shot in different ways, especially if they were re-shooting scenes at some point, as well.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy