Jump to content

LATEST RATINGS: July 20-24, 2020


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

This is going to happen with all of them. They’re rushing these shows back with little promo and the stories are the same old crap which won’t entice people to tune in. I’ve always maintained they should’ve stacked episodes and relaunched late September with the primetime series and promoted their returns as a season premiere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members


I just don’t get why these egg heads didn’t think to relaunch with some sort of bang. B&B’s first week back was watchable, but it was so low key. Maybe do a return or something major to say “WE’RE BACK!” Even without proper promotion it would give them something to build over time. 
 

I’m especially curious for Y&R because that show was so damn boring when it went off the air. Good luck winning back those viewers with that mess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I agree. They should be using this as a 'relaunch' if you will. Have things HAPPEN. B&B sounded watchable, I didn't watch and forgot to set the DVR to check it out. They could have really promoted the return of new episodes. 

 

Yeah, I'm curious about Y&R too. I think they may have an uphill battle to reclaim viewers unless they make drastic changes. But they clearly don't seem to think they have a problem. None of the soaps seem to realize the problems they have that we see on a daily basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This cracks me up!

 

Agree with GLATWT88 too, wasn't sure what numbers to expect for BB (but probably better than this).

 

Adding, I've been enjoying Days' last four wedding-themed weeks, been noticing an increase each week.

Edited by clubkidjeff
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't find the numbers that surprising. It doesn't take long for individual viewing habits to change when they are forced to. For daytime, most people watched daily or caught up weekly. If they weren't interested in repeats, they found something else to do. I expect the numbers will improve a little bit over the next couple of weeks as more people hear there are new episodes, and again when Y&R comes back, but my guess FWIW is that 20% or so won't come back, particularly if they were just watching out of habit rather than actual enjoyment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would have guessed this.  I didn't see any promotion for B&B returning and now they were all pre-empted yesterday for the funeral.  Soap viewing is habit and people are out of the habit.  I wouldn't doubt it that Y&R will tank even more than it was, unless they promote its return and pair it with promotions with B&B - both are back....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just think there isn't much money for... anything. They could have been using the time to retool things, write some good scripts, try to get some big actors back, do promo. They can't afford to do any of that so they're all going to pick up with the same scripts and only minor tweaks to recap. It's a completely wasted opportunity. Plus, they have to pay the costs of testing and the on-set virus consultants. Filming is probably taking nearly twice as long.  We know on B&B, they are filming scenes twice because of the mannequins. Y&R is doing more shooting outside which comes with lighting and sound complications. So more costs, less revenue, and lower ratings. It's not good. I predict that all of the soaps will be moving to  DAYS-type schedule of cramming in months of filming as soon as that's possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Randall Edwards (and Brian Tarantina), with the opening night cast of 1985's Biloxi Blues, plus director Gene Saks and playwright Neil Simon.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That was my point really. These anniversary party scenes are the first ones, and now they won't be able to use them (meaning these actual scenes, as aired, with OG Ted). They can recreate them but I doubt they will spring for all the extras to come back and film and recreate everything, so it will be more like tight closed in shots of Ted with one or two other actors, or snippets of Leslie's original speech where Ted wasn't visible. It would be hard to recapture the original energy of the scenes are as they were filmed in their full context. I just think that's too bad, but maybe they will prove me wrong. I never really saw what was so off in his portrayal to warrant a recast, anyway, so that colors my perception as well.
    • Yeah, and quite honestly, are there really that many scenes that are flashback-worthy at this point in the run?
    • I know at one point they were on Hulu & i-Tunes. I just checked it on JustWatch.com & it indicates 1 season on Prime Video & on AppleTV. Have fun!
    • That era is so weird...they made a big deal out of all three of those characters and then they just..disappeared! Not that I am complaining. We talk about the bad out of character writing for Alex under JFP..but this was one example that may have led them to write her being so obsessive with Nick.  WHY would Alex accept Flock of Seagulls guy as her brother? They had her in one scene (setting up the Alan return) complain that Alan abandoned her...she blackmailed him into leaving town and she had been angry at him for helping Brandon with Lujack and also using Spaulding for that dumb dreaming death thing. Endless scenes of her with Simon, I can't believe Bev wasn't bored to death! I would also add Pam writing the scene where she lets Ms. Sally die in front of her to protect Alan and  the writing for Alex could be screwy even before JFP.
    • On this day 34 years ago the final episode of Dallas and came in at an astonishing #2 in the ratings after two straight seasons of weak ratings. Interesting Knots was #27 for that week as well:  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thank you for clearing that up. I wasn't watching GL regularly yet at that point, but seems to me I should have remembered the big wedding after Leslie's death (which I do remember) described in the profile. Is there a web archive of SOD summaries, or are referring to your own personal collection?
    • I was bummed that 2.0 ended because Mcpherson (headwriter) had really set up some interesting stories and we never got to find out where the stories would go once they resumed production on 'season 2'. I remembered the EP (Ginger Smith) and a lot of the stars gave a lot of credit to McPherson being able to come in on very short notice and come up with stories/plots (I think it was a very short turnaround time of a few weeks).  It was nice that she got to redeem herself after her year long Days stint was not well reviewed/liked.
    • Enters                                 Speaks

      Please register in order to view this content

           
    • It seems like a setup for failure to review a single episode of a soap, but Cleveland Amory was a foolish man.  His taste was so predictable, that one wondered why bother reviewing a medium he so clearly disliked. (found on Facebook retro TV group) Another case in point of his misogyny from his review of Dark Shadows (Can you imagine the magazine with the widest circulation in the country insulting its customer in this way today?)

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy