Jump to content

Soaps Blandest Marginally Acceptable Leading Men


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Not going to be popular but damn Tony Geary was not great.  Neither was Roger Howarth.  My sisters gasped at how hot they were.  This was the 80’s and 90’s when all magazines covered ABC And NBC.  I’d say you better look at Newman on Guiding Light.  Cause those 2 guys are not handsome 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

A lot of great names mentioned on here already, with definitely Holden, Frank, Liam,  Nick Newman and Days’s Daniel  all leading the way!

 

I’d have to also nominate both Nick Spaulding and Coop as bland leading men on GL. Noah on ATWT was downright DREADFUL. Then there was just about all the Chris Hugheses on ATWT. So was Rick Forrester on B&B at least from 2000-2011 or whenever Jacob Young assumed the role again. 

 

Surprised that no one has mentioned Danny yet for Y&R. 

Please register in order to view this content

 Just awful all the way around I never liked him, not even in his early 90’s heyday. 
 

 

Edited by soapfan770
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

No offense taken. Richard Eden did the best he could after Kerry Sherman left, but the magic, fire and solid writing for Brick were no longer there. It's a shame, because Brick had so many ties to so many other characters - and so many more stories they could have done with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel some of the names mentioned are too defined to qualify if I am honest.
Of course, despite darn generously co-sharing credit for the idea with me, I am not the arbiter but I was thinking of soaps casting moderately good-looking embodiments of the shrug emoji.
So I don't think folks like John McBain qualify because, as much as I disliked him, I can describe his character. I don't *get* why he was a leading man but he was too polarizing for what I was thinking of. 
 

Meanwhile, good luck trying to explain what DOOL's Eric or YR's Paul or GL's Frank (all good choices) are about to someone who has never watched the show other than "decent guy, I guess". Neither has ever been on so much as to be grating, has ever done anything objectionable or memorable or interesting. They're there. They get stories, generally involving romance. I don't hate that they're there but there is no there, there.
I'd also add a side category: the marginally acceptable bland leading man character who is so bland that they can't nail down a performer for him because the character has nothing. The parades of OLTL Kevins, ATWT Chrises, AW's Jamie. It takes hell of an empty shell of a character for several actors to play the same role without anyone making a mark.

I am on the fence whether I would list B&B's Liam in the same category. Hear me out, the character itself doesn't have much meat BUT he does serve a purpose as a plot device. Generally bad repetitive plot devices, mind you, and inexplicable indeed, but can't deny the character has made a mark on the show (too much of a mark).
I can't tell you much about his personality, which brings me close to what we are talking about here, but I can tell you plenty of tales of things he did that annoyed or pissed me off. He has the bland part down but he is somewhat objectionable.
Zende would be more what I have in mind or even Pierson Fode's Thomas before they switched the writing after the recast.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

However, some of these characters are needed to counterbalance the other male leads on a show. Yes, Y&R's Paul might be vanilla, but he's a refreshing change from the other men in his age range (Jack, Victor, Michael), who are all posturing d***heads. And Doug Davidson is very good in scenes where he has to be emotionally vulnerable. Now that TPTB at Y&R have demoted him to recurring status, they seem to be giving more of those scenes to Peter Bergman, who I find laughably bad and unsympathetic, even when he's blubbering away.

 

Now, Paul's insta-son, Steve Burton's character Dylan: that dude had the personality of a piece of aluminum siding. He'd be a good contender for this list. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Well, in Paul's defense, I'm old enough to remember the young, slightly shady, disappointment to his father Paul.  The one who was Victor's paid henchman, keeping an eye on his prisoner in the basement (Victor's first wife Julia'a lover---Nick the photographer, IIRC) and going undercover to clear his father of allegations of being a dirty cop (I think, it was a long time ago).  I'd never claim that DD was in the echelon of the likes of Michael Zaslow et al....but he's better than the vacant hair models stereotypes.  

 

 

As for Scott Holmes, crc.....is he bland....or just bad? *shrug*

Edited by P.J.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

100% agree on Scott Holmes and 1000% on Aidan.


I have a lot of loathing towards SB so I find him instinctly objectionable because he is such a bad actor.
The other names are not bad actors per se. They're just serviceable.
As PJ said for instance, Doug Davidson can act. He can be quite good at times. He is just a nothing of a character (in the past 35 years at least)


As for ATWT's Jack, I agree that on paper, he could have been one of those. But aided by the fact MP is a good actor and very charming and by the undeniable chemistry between him and Carly, he managed to elevate himself a cut above the rest, all the while the character's personality is indeed a bit bland.

It is a bit the same for me with YR's Brad. On paper there was not much to the character other than what happened to him and the women in his life. But DD is very charismatic and charming and gave him enough substance that you almost forgot that he didn't really have a defined personality.

It is all very subjective though of course.

I think most of the names we can totally agree on. I mean Aidan is *exactly* what I had in mind so much so that I actually ... had forgotten about him even though he is exactly what I had in mind.
That kinda says it all, doesn't it? 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Dani had a flashback of Dani getting ready for an event with Bill. The gown she wore in the flashback was light green and elegant and gorgeous. The light green flashback dress was quite different than the red/orange/lilac swirling print beaded gown that Dani is wearing to Nicole's anniversary party.   But there was clearly the show's intention to have the Dupree women (except for Nicole) wearing shades of red.   I love Anita but the red gown that she's wearing to the anniversary party -- not flattering.
    • I think you can find them here https://www.tumblr.com/tagged/OLTL What's there is recaps from SOD at the times it shows which is usually from way back up till 2003. Most if not all of this is due to Matt Smith who you may recall from his AW playlists on YoutTube. 
    • Party wardrobe color theme: Good Queen Nicole is in a solid gold gown. The other Dupree women (plus Smitty) are wearing shades of red/pink (with purple accents) -- Anita, Dani, Chelsea, Kat, in dresses. -- Smitty in white shirt and maroon jacket. (did not see Naomi?) "The help" Eva and Mona are in black. Antagonist queen Leslie/Dana in a black/gold gown. The men (except for Smitty) are wearing black. Ted - white shirt, black tie, black jacket. (Ted's jacket was shiny or velvet or a textured fabric - I couldn't quite tell, but the jacket color was solid black) Vernon - black turtleneck, white dress shirt over it, black jacket (no tie). Andre - black T-shirt, gold chain, black jacket. Martin - black shirt, black tie, black jacket. Dr. Carlton Fitzgerald - white shirt, black tie, black jacket. (did not see Jacob?) I didn't see Naomi and Jacob at the party, but perhaps they arrive later? The evening is not over yet.
    • Tate seems to love throwing punches now

      Please register in order to view this content

      I enjoyed his scenes with Johnny. Both of their perspectives make perfect sense to me and are completely relatable. There’s no right or wrong person in this situation and I like that. LH  does pretty well when Tate is angry too, but I also liked the way that he comforted Johnny in the end. Days is finally remembering that they’re cousins. And, Johnny looked hot in the beginning   Btw, Johnny going to work for Xander? That could be interesting. And, also can cause some more animosity between him and EJ.  And again, Marlena/Belle were great. Scenes like theirs really seem to be commonplace under Paula/Jeanne and I couldn’t be happier that they are. It’s helps us get a much better understanding of these characters and why they do the things that they do and feel the way that they feel. Marlena supporting Belle was a bit of surprise, considering her insane reaction when she walked in on EJ and Belle, but I also feel that it’s totally in character for her, both as a psychiatrist and as Belle’s mother.  As for Sophia and Amy… I miss the first Sophia lol but I can’t help but think that Amy suddenly being so nice is foreshadowing of something. Either that, or Paula/Jeanne aren’t biased against her
    • @alwaysAMC Great mini-review as always.  That Gilly story is...certainly one I could not forget... I imagine a number of viewers were shocked with the temporary recast. It was revealed in the soap magazines, as was the news about Frank Beaty's breakdown, I think. I think Wolf had some statements or an interview at the time but very little. I wish someone could interview him. He did a good job under extremely tough circumstances.  For some reason I have a vague memory of him in the Marian getup but that's probably not right.  I'm glad you have appreciated the material with Susan after a shaky start. I always enjoyed her, and she was the only love interest I liked Nick with. 
    • How did this come to be?

      Please register in order to view this content

      Btw, if he’s on again, you should apply to be a contestant
    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJJTEW8J5EA/ 1989 Daytime Emmys Victoria Wyndham gives moving tribute to Douglas Watson, AW's Mac Cory Harding "Pete" Lemay created the character Mac Cory & then Doug Watson played him for 15 years. When Doug died on May 1st, 1989, it was a huge loss to the show, the other actors & also to the fans.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Jonathan Kellerman is definitely the most EON/Slesar-like writer in the business right now.  Unfortunately, he's almost 80 years old.  Interestingly, he has a son (Jesse Kellerman) who's about 45, who's been studying under him.  I believe what makes the Kellermans such effective mystery & crime writers is their background in psychology.  
    • I never understood the point of Marchetti. Summer left the show for a job there in Italy. OK. When she returned they had Jack buy the company. Why couldn't Summer have returned and simply stated it was not a good fit, she missed her home , family/friends etc It was absurd that this internationally successful fashion empire could just be bought by a US cosmetics firm at the drop of a hat. What was the point when they never did anything with it at all? Summer simply could have gone to work at Jabot. And wasn't there some nonsense about an offshhoot called Marchetti Home? Was Phyllis attached to that at some point? This show...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy