Jump to content

Soaps In The Time of Crisis


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 189
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

 

Maybe she meant written through Christmas. Ron even tweeted he was just writing Christmas (and that was well after the production break started on March 13...and they write stuff months before taping it).

 

They have fully taped through around October 20-ish. Ron mentioned being done through Halloween/early November, but I believe those would only be partial episodes, not much fully completed past the October 20-ish time frame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Members

Right now, we know that YR and BB are airing repeats. 

 

From what I last read on here, GH will probably run out of episodes sometime in June. 

 

DAYS has episodes until October. 

 

If production resumes in late May, what is the likelihood that GH will not have a lapse in their run? I'm not sure what the turnaround is for filming and finishing an episode of a soap. 

 

DAYS considering that things are beginning to ease, I'm assuming won't have to worry about having to fill a gap. If anything this will be a benefit to DAYS as I am unsure why a daytime soap would want to film so far in advance considering it makes it challenging to make changes based on public reaction to storylines. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Knowing Frank and how he runs GH they will likely want to rush out a subpar product just to have new episodes.

 

I wonder if Y&R or B&B will use this opportunity to do a soft reset, reassess their canvas and get rid of dead weight, start new stories or even offer something as simple as a time jump so viewers can more readily jump into the action. Or will they continue with all of the current incredibly boring stories they're telling?

 

I mean, this is unprecedented, the people running daytime have been on a bullet train for decades with no chance to sit back and reflect, this could be that chance. But will they do something about it or continue floundering?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Good point. I assumed YR and BB would continue with the current storylines, but the current situation does open up the opportunity to do something like a time jump as you mentioned. I really only got into watching some weeks ago after taking a break from soaps for some time, but I will say I didn't see anything on YR or BB that was all that exciting. Then again, soaps require an investment and I don't really care for many of the characters currently in the forefront of BB and tbh I had no idea what was going on over at YR to actually realize if I cared or not. 

 

I think you might be right about GH trying to start right back up and rush something out instead of having a lapse in its run. I don't know how their repeats are performing on Fridays, but I'm calling them repeats and not classics because from what I've read they've only gone as far back as 2017/18 with their Friday episodes. Honestly, I'm not sure how they're promoting these episodes over at ABC because if they're calling them classics that a stretch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At this rate I could see soaps going back into production by late June/early July at the earliest. In addition to everything else, they’ll have to get the production staff back to work and sanitize those dirty sets. Plus the writers are furloughed and will likely have to do rewrites to eliminate or minimize older actors and change group scenes. For Y&R in particular, I’d look at the success of these classic episodes and go back to an old school Bill Bell style with longer scenes with less people, a more character driven approach. It would be easier to film with social distancing and could bring some style back to the show. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Is it bad I could so see Thudley at B&B producing new episodes through Xoom and or Skype like the Talk? I can just see Flo announcing via Skype or Xoom to Brooke, Steffy, Hope, and Zoe how Sally was faking her illness with all of them in shock as they drink wine(except for Brooke) LMAO.

Edited by soapfan770
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Honestly, the other 3 soaps can learn a lot from DAYS on the TJ concept. I give credit to DAYS for doing it, but Stevano just ruined it for me. 

 

The writers are definitely cranking out scripts during this period, but I still don't believe we'll get anything new until July at the earliest.  

 

B&B can crank out episodes the fastest - not just because they are shorter, but it's production seems far more machine-like. Look at how they handled all those impeachment pre-emptions, where they basically retooled and nearly eliminated all the holiday stuff and quickly jumped from there. Plus B&B can focus on one story for several episodes more easily than  GH/Y&R - see Thomas/Hope wedding build-up weeks then switched almost exclusively on Brooke video and/or Sally for next batch of episodes. B&B literally can have episodes with only 3-4 actors and tell (and repeat) a story. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's interesting that there was a significant surge in ratings at the beginning of the pandemic, but it quickly fizzled out. I wonder if it had to do with the constant preemptions or those who tuned in not finding their soap very interesting and tuning back out.

 

I'm also beginning to wonder how this lapse in new episodes for YR and BB will impact their ratings when they return and whether there are any strategies to promote them or make the audience aware of their return. I mean if they can broadcast TPIR on primetime...why can't they air an episode or two of the soaps especially in late summer where there aren't many new shows on. I mean YR pulling in 4 million is actually better than some of the primetime shows these days or pretty damn close. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Speaking of soaps in time of crisis, does anyone know if the 9/11 preemptions had any significant impact on the ratings and decline in viewership.

 

I was looking at the ratings and I know that many attribute the OJ trial playing a significant role in the erosion of soap ratings which is true to an extent. I noticed that from 1990 to 1994 YR saw year to year gains in viewership as well as other soaps showing that their numbers can grow even significantly from previous seasons. Now, what I'm curious about is what happened in the 2000/2001 season as this was before 9/11 as the season usually starts in September, that caused soaps to take such a rating hit. Even though ratings were eroding slowly after the OJ trial. It seems like as soon as 2000 came in the numbers just dropped. YR lost a whole point in households. I'm not sure if the numbers are completely accurate as they're from Wiki, but was there something major that would have caused this rapid decline?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I don't really remember it having a big impact. Y&R was having ratings struggles before this point - if memory serves, there were articles being written about it in SOD in spring or summer 2001. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Am I the only one who thinks that when soaps resume production, they should just pick up right where they left off and ignore the fact that time has passed? That way each show gets right back into what they were doing without anything being forgotten or changed. 

 

If we can ignore SORASing and the continuity errors that it brings, I’m sure we can also ignore the fact that it’s suddenly one month or two months later then when we last saw these characters.

Edited by AbcNbc247
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Given that both Y&R and B&B ended on low points as they haulted production it would be for the best if they did that sort of thing when they resume production. 
 

 

Y&R went through a large turnover of cast and characters with a drop in story quality. In fact most  most soaps really dropped In quality as the rise of more reality shows occurred. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members


I feel this would be a mistake if they want to maximize viewers. For the first time ever they have the chance to do a relaunch, or season premiere and they should all take advantage of that. I would craft big return stories for all of them, maybe even bring somebody back  so you have the same buzz as when prime time shows return. Otherwise I don’t see the ratings going back to where they were. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The show is definitely trying to make Lulu seem like she's wrong and Brook Lynn is being tormented.  I just don't really see it that way.  Lulu really hasn't done anything except confront BLQ.   She hasn't told anyone, Chase already knows, and she's writing an article about adoption.  Everyone is jumping down her throat for something Lulu actually has a personal investment in.  Brook Lynn's freakout about a newspaper article on adoption is way more suspicious than Lulu just writing a story about it lol. Chase is coming off ridiculously self-righteous too.  Telling Dante to make Lulu stop while lying to him about his child.
    • I do like that they seem to be pushing ahead with Dante and Lulu as opposed to what I feared would be an overly-long wait for a reunion. But while Lulu has always been rash and at times self-righteous, the story does feel skewed towards FV's faves (Setton vs. Laura's kids).
    • The fact that Lois brought Gio to Brook Lynn's wedding, encouraged him to stay in town, then decided he should live at the Q's make her look dim and like she was asking to get caught lol. I still strongly dislike this story, but the performances have been good.  Like you said Gio finally has a story and Dante will get something to do besides playing house with Sam on the backburner.
    • @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I'm up to 300. About 12 episodes left of the Barnes.  The development of the Prescott family has been the big event in the last few months of episodes I've watched. Jerry Timms as Gil is a nice addition as the show's new young stud. I like when the villains start out as deeply human and just generally flawed individuals like Gil, and early Nancy. Something the show does well is the sorta low level conflict that can generate with things like Gil's carefree playboy "life of the party" lifestyle interfering in the day to day happenings of him and his family. Gil is a shameless flirt and orders a beer or three when he is on lunch from the construction site. I think the conflict between himself and his father, Jason, is compelling even if I'm not sold on Read Morgan. If Morgan was a local talent, I think I might be more generous, but Morgan had a bit of primetime credits I believe. Jason, like Gil, isn't a one woman man so the internal conflict within the Prescott clan is ripe for drama. Yet, there are definitely flaws. Gil's relationships with Sheila Carter, a recast Vicki Lang, and Deena Greely seem to unattached to the larger story that I am not invested. Donna Denton isn't bad as Deena, but she lacks a bit of presence to carry the story in Mitch Dunbar's absence; she is now Mitch's law partner. Gil's flirtation with a married Lori was interesting and appeared to be done to build conflict between Gil and Russ, who seems to be heading in Renee Crawford's Marianne Prescott's direction now that Becky is out the door. Crawford slides right into the role of Lori's friend and Russ' love interest well even if Becky was (at least in the pre-Barnes) episodes more compelling as a woman who had deeper flaws than Marianne. Marianne's inner conflict has some legs if it goes anywhere. With her mother Corrine's passing, Marianne has assumed the mantle of the woman in her father's life and defacto mother to her restless, reckless brother Gil. At present, Marianne is putting her graphic design dreams on hold to work at Prescott Development, sacrificing her own desires for the "greater good" fo the Prescott men. I feel like Marianne is the kind of girl that Carrie Weaver will love and unintentionally terrorize with her overbearing, nearly incestual love for her son, Russ. If Chris Auer hadn't jumped ship to the writing team (his scripts are strong so I'm not mad), I would have liked to seen Francis pining for Marianne to complete the assumption of Becky's role in the lives of the men Becky knew (and who loved her).  The complete revision of the Vicki character with the recast and pairing her with Gil is odd. It is basically a new character. Laura Leigh Taylor's Vicki was more conservative and business focused while the new Vicki is more outgoing and lively. I don't hate the new actress but it's such a dramatic shift in characterization and I'm not clear why. I know a later character (Stacey Phillips) assumes the characterization of Taylor's Vicki Lang, but I don't think that occurs until a few months into Jason Vining's work. I also just cannot see Taylor's Vicki giving Gil the time of day when she constantly rejected Peter.  The quad between newly arrived developer Jason Prescott, recently widowed Terry, Terry's old friend Dr. Alex Greely, and Jason's corporate attorney Sharon Landers is equally weak. Alex comes off as desperate. Robert Burchette is more than serviceable in the role of friend and the lovelorn colleague, but Alex's jealousy of Jason doesn't work for me. I don't get the sense the friendship has run that deep, but maybe it does for Alex. The actress playing Sharon lacks the bravado to sell Sharon as this shark who kills it in the boardroom and could tear apart the moral Terry. I like that Jason's relationships with Terry and Sharon echo Gil's own bad boy behavior that Jason constantly chatisizes Gil for, but I do wish there was some angle here to root for other than praying that Terry decides to enter the convent.  As I was reflecting on the Prescotts, I can see why Vining makes some of the changes he does. Jason isn't a bad character, but Read Morgan doesn't work in the role. Recasting probably would have worked given the show's large canvas involved in the city planning of Kingsley from the political and business angles, but as the show delves deeper into the criminal underworld, I can see why Jason was just dropped. Also, it would have been more interesting if Jason's wife wasn't dead, but had divorced him ages ago and was living in abroad to pop up as a conflict down the line, which is ultimately what happened with Dave and Kate Phillips. On a side note, Dave has been offscreen for most of the tailend of the Barnes run reconciling with his either estranged or ex-wife, I cannot remember which.  The Prescott Development stories are bizarre. You have the antics of Gil slowly turning Peter to the dark side (a story that would have worked better with Nancy as the devil on Peter's shoulder) which is obviously built to give conflict between Jason and Terry. Simiarly, Gil's romance of Alex's niece Deena seems to set up animosity between Jason and Alex over their child and defacto child. I just cannot invest in Terry and Jason. Not that I want Alex and Terry, but Jason is just not working for me. I get we are going for the gruff widower who works in construction with a strong belief in the Lord, but I just don't think Jason projects the image of romantic lead. It's reminiscent of Bert Kramer as Alex Wheeler for me.  The story the Cavalares family is insane. Dom Cavalares is the drunk single father of teenage Donna. Donna is friends with Jill and they smoke some weed together before Donna ends up being taken into the Cummings home because when her father gets drunk he gets physically abusive. The scene of a drunk Dom breaking into the Cummings' home and attacking Donna is wild. It is a terrifying sequence where Dom comes in raging to get his daughter back with the Cummings' girls (Liz, Jenny, and Jill) and Donna present before Jeff comes in and gets knocked out by Dom. I think it ends with Donna being dragged away. I cannot imagine any show doing that in the past two decades.  In some ways, I suspect that the Barnes might have dusted off Roy Winsor's projection for the Jeff Cummings story and used them as the inspiration. When Jason learns Dom is a drunk, Dom ends up going to AA, which was the original story direction before Jeff was saved by the light. The bookstore angle quickly faded before being shifted to Jill to give her something to do. The set up for the Cummings' turning their home into a halfway house was probably the spinoff idea. I don't think its terrible, but it's not working in the larger scale of the show's canvas. I appreicate the attempts to rectify the Jeff story by having Dom turn to AA (offscreen), but I would have liked it more if we actually saw some more regret from Jeff over what he had done. Beth Slaymaker's role in this story is intriguing. As the judge handling Donna and Dom's situation, it is clear that she has a bit of sympathy for Dom that she might not have had if she hadn't given up Jill when she was younger.  The Jill-Peter romantic angle never developed the way I expected it to. Jill's "transformation" leading to more interest from both Gary and Peter feels dated by modern standards, but was probably a popular trope for the time. I think Jill has stopped appearing now that Beth has bought her the book store. I cannot say I am sorry to see her go because I don't think they knew what to do with her. Jill was such an abrasive character who I didn't like as a person, but who made sense. She was just exhausting in larger doses. Seidman was much more appealing as Jill's persona softened.  The Redlons reunion has been odd. I don't remember if it was earlier and included in my last post, but Carla nearly runs off with Jimmy in a sequence that is very well done and tense. I don't think Carla and Gene work completely. Both actors are wonderful, but I don't like how they play the duo. Carla's career should have her being pulled in directions (which it does, at times) but I think its such an odd choice to play this story in isolation of the Russ-Becky marriage. Gene's political career isn't my favorite story, either, but that's more because I don't care for Jason. I'll do a separate post later about the Carpenters with Nancy and the end of Becky and Russ' marriage. 
    • I don't know about that, I think BC has mostly improved by leaps and bounds. He's not perfect but he's come along a lot.
    • Agreed. Ted getting recasted before Martin is crazy work lol. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy