Jump to content

Y&R-Mal Young Out, Josh Griffith Taking Over


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

In the 1970s, I enrolled in a television writing course in university. I created and wrote a bible for my own soap opera, including the first five scripts. I put a lot of blood, sweat and tears into it. I eventually had it evaluated by three different professors, all of whom were kind enough to give me detailed and extensive praise about it. I was thrilled to receive marks of 96% and 95% (twice), and long remarks/notes/suggestions/constructive criticisms on my writing. The entire student body of one of my classes was given my first script to read, and that went over well too. I was ecstatic and humbled when various classmates said, "I can't wait to see what happens next!" I was in heaven!

 

On the other hand, some other people snarked, "Why waste your time on writing a soap opera? They are stupid, written for lethargic housewives who don't want to get out of their bathrobes. And the writing on them is trash!"

 

Pffft.

 

These anti-soap critics obviously knew nothing of the medium. At the time, we had Harding Lemay on AW, Agnes Nixon on AMC, Bill Bell and Pat Falken Smith on DAYS, Henry Slesar on TEON...daytime dramas were at their peak in terms of quality writing!

 

The criticism of today's soaps is justified. No writer working at any modern soap is talented enough to do the job well. But in the 1950s-80s, when the masters were at play, we had marvelous material to watch.

 

Really, ATWT was the only soap you wanted to write?

 

As they started to fall apart under incompetent writers and producers, I longed to take over the reigns of MANY soaps. I would make notes on how I would repair the damage done by the hacks, and continue on with (hopefully) better plots, characters and themes.

 

ATWT, TGL, DAYS, OLTL, etc., were all on my radar.

 

When Somerset got axed in 1976, I was so annoyed by its missed opportunities and bungled storylines, I projected a year's worth of material for 1977 (I thought, "It could continue in syndication!" LOL!) and (I think) 10 scripts for January of that year. I think many of us dedicated soap lovers have had similar ideas. I ended up writing original stories and editing other writers' material at a publishing house, but never made it into soaps, alas.

 

My bloated ego assures me I would have been FABULOUS! ROTFLMAO!

Please register in order to view this content

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

Traditionally, soap fans have resisted hordes of newbies descending upon the shows and suddenly eating up huge sections of air time.

 

When Katherine Chancellor first appeared on Y&R, I was so invested in the characters I already knew and loved (the Brooks and the Foster families), that I was impatient when I had to sit through scenes of this stranger. I wanted her parts of the episodes to "hurry up and finish" so that could get back to watching Chris and Snapper, Brad and Leslie, etc. 

 

Bill Bell, being the savvy soap god that he was, knew better than to inundate us with Mrs. C five days a week right from the start. He introduced her slowly and sparingly at first, so we didn't instantly resent her and develop negative feelings about how she was taking over the show. By the time Katherine became a lead, we had been allowed to get to know her and become interested in her, and we WANTED to see a lot of her. That's the way to do it. Introduce a new character sparingly, have her interact with other characters whom we care about, and once she feels like part of the canvas, THEN increase her air time. Don't ram her down our throats from the very start because...it will only make us gag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yes, because writing for the theatre was always my main focus. 

For years, I only considered writing teleplays, like the ones aired on programs like PBS' American Playhouse.  Only when I got accepted to a dramatic writing program whose emphasis was intense practice in writing across all media (stage and screen) did I really consider writing for television.  For me, being raised on 1980s ATWT, it seemed very close to theater in the round to me.  

 

I have to be honest and say that I really only considered writing for a soap as a temporary, not a lifelong career goal.  As I began to study how to write, storyboard and shoot scripts and as I delved into writing screenplays, I began to look at broadening my portfolio and I eventually expanded my views on television, especially considering some of the high-quality content on streaming platforms, which seems less bound by the constraints that seem to bind network T.V.

 

Yes, Televest.  Every now and then, I forget and then am reminded that they exist.

Perhaps had I been persistent and called the office more than once in 2001, something may have panned out but it felt like a dead-end to me and so, I didn't pursue it.

Writing for the theater was my goal, I was enrolled in a full-time pre-professional writing program with a school that only accepts 20 students per year, so I really had a laser like focus on, not only completing my M.F.A. but to maintain a high G.P.A., so anything that didn''t seem to go with that goal, I promptly tossed aside.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks. I was just curious at to the timing (the recent post-Moonves CBS drama) and if the allegations surrounding Mal (what Abhi Sinha posted about, Milstein’s exit) had an impact. Of course, that may all be under tight wraps if so. 

 

Sounds like more rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic/business as usual. I just wonder, beyond the Rosaleses, how much of what we saw was McDaniel- or Sony-dictated and how much was MY leaving his mark. As you mentioned, much of the damage to the show’s look and feel preceded Mal by many, many years, so those are decisions higher up, but the claustrophobia really escalated in the last few months. The slapdash pacing and hopscotching of emotional beats are all on Mal, as that was his stated vision, but of course those choices are signed off on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I think so, too. A new detective is in town, and Paul is showing him the ropes. Perhaps he upstages Paul when it comes to a big case? It actually what I always wanted done with Ignacio Serricchio's character (name escapes me at the moment). He fit into the cast nicely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't have any inside info but seems to me that the execs keep picking someone for these EP/HW roles who can cow tow to those execs and handle the huge personalities behind the scenes (i.e. Braeden and Bergman).  It also seems that they have rotated who gets the power to run the show. CBS/Sony win every once in a while i.e. installing Pratt/Phelps and Bell family has won a few times (Maria Bell, Sussman/Alden).  The choice of Josh Griffith is unreal.  He's like Megan McTavish and Dena Higley all rolled into one. At least with both MM and DH, they achieved some high ratings on their shows in years past.  Griffith has absolutely never been successful as a head writer. He writes dime store novels and is well connected in Hollywood.  No doubt a smart guy. He has the unique distinction of doing more damage in his year plus at Days than Dena did in all her head writing stints.  

 

Why the execs cannot promote a female to each role from with in the YR production family tells me that the very capable women there don't want the role.  Sally MacDonald would probably be a great EP.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

This is one of the most wrong things you've said in a long history of overconfident wrong posts. Josh Griffith is indeed a terrible hack today, but his work at OLTL in the '90s was more successful than McTavish and Higley put together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

The only reason Griffith's work on OLTL was successful was because he was paired with Michael Malone.  Griffith's strength has always been day to day script writing and character based scenes.. but plot was never his strongest suit.  It was why I was hopeful when Higley/Griffith was paired because Higley had great ideas.. she just needed someone to flesh them out so that the story/idea worked for the character instead of making the character work for the story (Her Days stint in 2008/9 caused a spike in their ratings with the Sami/Nicole baby switch and Night Hope made sense given all the repressing Hope was doing of her emotions).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've seen Malone work alone. Griffith was necessary, lol. He was brought in to make Malone's work manageable for soap format, and he did so, but he didn't stop there.

 

Higley has never been a remotely competent HW. She lucked into a few gimmicks. As a creative she's trash and always has been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm more curious to know why Josh is head writing the show when he came in as a temporary replacement for Lisa de Cazotte (a supervising producer & probably one of Steve Kent's cronies from SANTA BARBARA). Maybe Lisa is coming back & Sony installed Tony as executive producer because being showrunner would be too much for breakdown-prone Josh. I'll poke my sources... 

 

The Rosales family is all Angelica. Don't let her fool you! She installed her friend to oversee Y&R and that friend is out of her depth. Margot Wain is overseeing B&B and PRICE IS RIGHT. Without someone like Margot Wain running interference between Angelica & Y&R, the show will never recover. Maybe this is why B&B has been steadier while Y&R been flung about with no care at all. 

 

From my own experience of trying to get an internship at AMC in the early-00s, they had zero interest in bringing in someone who wasn't a friend or family member. It seemed like their writing program was the same way. The Sony soaps, which could easily have a writing program if they wanted to invest in the next generation of talent. So could B&B. So could DAYS. At this point, I feel like they don't want to get better, invest in the future, etc. It's sad to see.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Griffith has never been successful.  Malone was the force behind OLTL success with sweeping stories. Griffith probably helped with pacing, scripts, breakdowns and some story beats.  He's been awful as a sole head and had to be rescued by Malone during his second tenure.  While Dena is a hack, I give her and Quan credit for the first six months after Griffith left in cleaning up the nightmare he left behind.  I never said McTavish was great, but she crafted some very successful stories on AMC (not on GH, OLTL or GL).  Dena lasted three years on OLTL and it was watchable for some of her tenure. Not so with Griffith. He is a horrible choice for Y&R.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That was the original point of me sending you her 6 airdates, so now with those, and the link to the daily episode guide I've provided, that should help you more easily find the additional Ruth Buzzi scenes. I will always repeat myself when it comes to defending my data that I've taken decades to research and compile. But, as you pointed out in a recent post, I am kind, so at least I will do it with you in a kind way as opposed to the usual social media way most people do with just getting rude/nasty. That's not my style, as you correctly pointed out earlier this week, and never will be.  So, all is well! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
    • Well, that was down to CBS being weak and not being willing to just pulling the plug entirely. They didn't want to commit to cancelling the show in case they needed it for their schedule basically; plus they kept showing that they were willing to make cuts if needed to be. 
    • I'm sorry but clearly what I've said is not satisfactory to you. I have now read what you have to say, twice. As it happens, my interest at this point is looking at other mislabeled files to find this other Ruth Buzzi content. I do not see any point to each of us repeating ourselves, so I will leave it here. 
    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
    • I feel like Vernon and Anita need to not be hypocrites and try and take the heat off Bill in this case. It's clear that the family used him as a fixer and especially knowing he helped with Martin's situation, they need to either be quiet or support him. BTW...with Vanessa being in the hospital for food poisoning, am I the only one who thought Shanice was gonna say she's pregnant or had an STD? The only reason I say STD is because she hasn't had any memorable sex partners, but I definitely don't believe she just had food poisoning.
    • Yeah, I mean I know that the name still pertains. I just laugh at it not now being called Arizona Dust, but, I admit it simply does not have the same ring to it. Above, that is interesting that Arizona had already come up before the crisis. 
    • Anita vs. Leslie, bring it!
    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy