Jump to content

How much time do we give Sally Sussman before we ask for her firing?


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Thanks. I was struggling to think of someone acceptable who might pass muster with TPTB.

 

Therein lies the problem. If not Sally, who would be better for the show? I haven't been that impressed with Sally, but I just don't know of a better option so I'm trying to remain patient. 

It's tough, you know. You look at those 18-34 ratings, and they are just horrid across the board. There's no future with those ratings. All of TV, broadcast and cable, daytime and primetime, is dealing with serious audience erosion due to changing viewing habits. Everyone is living on borrowed time, and I think the networks are just biding their time until they go the way of the dinosaur. Everyone's rushing to adapt by starting OTT services, and it doesn't look like soaps will be part of the equation. I suppose the networks are just trying to sustain these shows with as little fuss as possible, stemming the audience loss as best they can, until they can find suitable, cheaper replacements, so there's no real desire to innovate or change course in anything but a superficial way. They just aren't invested, as we all know. Will anyone, with all of the competing media, really devote five hours a week to a show in an antiquated, conservative genre with 40-50 years of history when you can just binge your way through the various Netflix shows? There's less barrier to entry. And most of us acquired the soap habit from family members when we were very young, and that just doesn't happen as much anymore in any medium.

 

 

  • Replies 264
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

I'm not that fond of SSM (I think she has an ego that outweighs her talent considerably) but I'd get a co-HW rather than ditch her entirely. Someone new to the genre. Not Pratt, not Sheffer, not Guza, and so on.

 

I think that the effect of Netflix has become a bit of a crutch for most TV shows. Netflix is desperately overhyped by masturbatory critics who need to feel special. I don't think most of the audience that soaps are losing are flocking to Netflix. No one has dropped Y&R to see Kevin Spacey mutter and shout his way through yet another role. The problem is that the networks and the showrunners were ashamed of that audience, and now most of them have lost interest entirely, or just watch Hallmark, or Faux News, or a talk show. 

  • Members
Posted

I'd rather take a boring Y&R than anything I've seen for the last 10 years. 

 

Sussman's storylines all need a serious shot in the arm. And that's a co-HW who is better at structuring stories. 

 

I just want them to give Sussman at least a year. Y&R was destroyed for the last decade. It was disemboweled live on air. She hasn't done anything except write safe, boring storylines, with some really well done individual episodes thrown in. 

  • Members
Posted

 

Sally has made YR horribly dull, boring and a cure for insomnia. Her ratings are sinking. Rehire JFP she will goose the ratings back up. All is forgiven Jill.

  • Members
Posted

Nobody is going to find a new head writer to give them instant gratification.  I'm enjoying the show and love that it seems like Y&R was many years ago.

  • Members
Posted


I'm liking it as well. it does need so serious tweaking, but I am WAY past stunt SLs, no characterization and just downright stupid stories...like when JFP and CP were there. nowhere near perfect but better than what it has been IMPO. 

  • Members
Posted

 

Alden executed a fictional takeover once. Come on, boo, take over in real life too!

Please register in order to view this content

 

 

Exactly. And the answer to a co-HW is so obvious, it's painful! 

  • Members
Posted

So who is not a WGA writer? Imagine someone at Y&R replacing Sally and her/his work being better...LOL  Ratings across the board are bad. Writers aren't worth the money....sorry....

  • Members
Posted

 

Any writer who is willing to go fi-core will have to be willing to pretty much never be in the WGA again and never get any major writing work again.

  • Members
Posted

depends on how fast the ratings slide.  I can see CBS trying to repurpose the team by convincing Kay to take the co-headwriter role (dump Thomson which I half expect them do do anyway) and elevate Bibel or Esser to co-head writers along with Alden/Sally.  But the current structure aint working so far.

  • Members
Posted

I think Mal may be part of the problem; he seems ineffectual (creatively speaking).  Any long term fan would have known to make the changes he made when he came in i.e. remodel some of the sets etc.  So while many fans were enthused at his early style changes, it wasn't rocket science.  The lighting he implemented is absolutely dreadful though and he doesn't seem to be guiding Sally and Kay on a creative vision that's interesting or watchable.  That's why he's been hired; so I think he needs to change course as well or he needs to go.  If CBS wouldn't unduly interfere, Sally MacDonald should be EP and Slater/Esser should be head writers.  Why is that the production company has failed to look within to promote as Sony has done time and again at Days? Days has a history of promoting producers, dialogue and break down writers to the writing staff (not just Higley) i.e. Anderson, Quan, Milstein, Schoettle, Laiman, Allen, Depreist, Smith.  I'm sure I'm missing a few.  AMC did it with McTavish and Broderick.  Sally did work under Bell but she hadn't contributed to story in over ten years and it shows. She boasted about not watching the show after she was fired, but that's not something to be proud of, or smart if you want to head write the show later on. If you want a job in daytime you watch daytime. She wanted the salary but so far doesn't deserve it. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Creatively, he probably should have stayed with The Doctors, where he stood out as an antihero lead. Not sure what happened with GH. He didn't have the same impact. Was it bad writing, not clicking with co-stars? Didn't they gave him a boat load of money to join GH in 1976? Was Mark Dante just a toned-down version of Nick Bellini? Were they basically the same character?
    • All I can think of is if a lot of big names were leaving around that time she wanted him back as a stopgap, although I have never seen any real evidence that he was popular with GH viewers.
    • I loved watching Shanice hand Leslie her ass and finally shutting her up. It was so good. I also love Martin & Smitty's family.  Anita has to have some sort of plan giving Leslie the tickets to mail for Winterfest. She has to be setting her up for a fall. It's pretty obvious to me Vernon is not cheating with Sharon. I think Sharon is helping him with his terrible singing voice for Winterfest. I still believe Bill & Dani are endgame but I love Dani & Andre too. I am definitely enjoying this story. And making Hayley a black widow is a nice twist.
    • Sorry for the spam. Wasn't sure where to put this, it's from Tony Geary's husband's IG. Tony watching Genie and Maurice on Mo's show.
    • This show is really trundling along BTW. When is someone going to show up to slit Beastmaster's throat or crack the whip on metrosexual Sidwell? (BTW, openly presenting this cheery bon vivant as casually bisexual would at least be something vaguely diverting.) At least kill Brennan by year's end. I'm bored.
    • She told Vanessa to "DOUBLE her offer" on the Jarvis house.  The Jarvis family accepted the doubled price.  Assuming the house has an appraised value of $2,000,000, she's theoretically paid the Jarvis family $4,000,000 for the house.  The bank would loan Leslie 80% of the appraised value ($1,600,000), and Leslie had to pay the balance with cash at closing --- $2,200,000.  She only had ONE million.  Where the hell did she get the rest?!  And now she's got contractors working on the house all day & half the night.  Who's paying THEM?  I keep thinking all this will crash around her.  Either that or the writers have absolutely no idea the limits of a million dollars.  Sounds like a "lot of money", but it obviously ain't when we look at Leslie's spending since she got that million dollar check in August.     
    • Maree Cheatham     pg. 403

      Please register in order to view this content

            MATLOCK Sister Peggy (1) 2025   Ray Wise    pg. 428 movie THE WOLF IN THE WELL    Roland Carmel    2024 THE NAPA BOYS    Officer Toland   2025   PodCast HAVOC TOWN      Josiah Abbess       2025    
    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy