Jump to content

EW: Soap characters who got away with their crimes


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

99% of soap characters get away with crimes b/c the writers nowadays are too lazy to send characters off to do real time for their crimes. Instead, they prop these corrupt characters up as pillars of the community instead of seriously punishing them.

 

When was the last time a major soap character got sent to jail and actually did a stint (as in years) for it? Only people that come to mind for me are Alan on GL, Carl on AW, and Michael on Y&R. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The real issue is that daytime is so unimaginative and so focused on shock and shlock, that a lot of characters routinely commit crimes (some of them heinous and despicable, in the process destroying the character) because it's more "exciting" and "fun" and "omg" to have the 123rd murder within a year than to write complicated, interesting family drama. It's easy to do constant crimes. Of course, this becomes even worse when they ignore the crimes, having everyone pretend it's OK and justify them, and then proceed to have characters do it again and again and again.

 

If characters nowadays paid for their crimes, each show would have about five characters each.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yeah, where's the latest cast photo of Days of Our Lives?

 

Nick Fallon did almost four years in prison for terrorizing Melanie and killing Trent Robbins. I thought that was handled well. Gabi spent a year-and-a-half in prison for shooting Nick dead. I know a lot of people think she got off too easy (especially since she got away with masterminding Melanie's stalking and kidnapping), but she was a young mother who did actual prison time for shooting a lunatic who'd been terrorizing her, so... meh. I do wish it was at least a minor issue in her relationship with Nick's cousin, JJ, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I read something recently that said that soap writers are afraid to have characters be punished for their actions.

 

Its idiotic. That's what soaps used to do have characters pay and be redeemed by their own actions not be propped out the wazoo as "redemption"(looking at you Sonny, Carly, Jason & Sam on GH)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^

All of this. However, I don't think we'd even have 5 characters. Those 5 would be arrested for being accessories of crimes for concealing the truth about crimes committed. 

 

I agree. I think Sonny and Jason are the issues on GH. I'd find them more compelling if they owned their sh-t and weren't written as good guys. 

 

Sam and Carly have proven they can be upstanding citizens and just basic soap vixens when they are out of Sonny/Jason's orbit. 

 

Technically, yes. She supposedly killed Sasha Green but it wasn't confirmed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was surprised anyone would bother bringing up ATWT and/or Kim & John in an current article. Then I saw the author was Alina Adams, and the lightbulb went off. I can't believe EW has a soap commentator, given that I saw there were more articles by her there. I assumed they just had their somewhat sketchy weekly fan recaps.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That  'character getting away with crimes' trope really started in the 80's as another example of the shift in storytelling that took hold at that time.

Can anyone think of examples of this before that time?

What were the consequences for Vanessa on Y&R when she shot Lance?

Rape seems to be the exception.I guess the attitude to this was different in the 60's/70's (at least as far as soaps were concerned) as it was something that was covered up and to be ashamed of.Usually with soap characters the rape occurred with someone the female character had an involvement with eg Bill Horton/Laura.Phil Brewer/Diana  etc.The male character was punished not by law but by losing the love of a woman,being shunned by the community or dying.

Bill Bell was,I think the first writer to have a character raped by a stranger as an act of violence.

Victor locking Michael Scott in the basement was an early example of a character getting away with a crime.Bill Bell must have justified it in some way.But it was part of a wave of storytelling that is now ridiculous in it's frequency.

Of course, in real life,people do get away with crimes but the morality of soaps these days means writers can let characters do the most heinous things and get off scott free...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy