August 27, 201411 yr Member Well, Ashley was in that movie "Beastly" a few years ago and she was really good lol. the movie sucked, but she was good. Did she play the beast?
August 27, 201411 yr Member I like that movie lol The movies was alright but I felt like it could've been better. Thus is the life of movies based on books. Did she play the beast? You're going to hell.
August 28, 201411 yr Member This show is horrible! John Stamos is literally the only thing good about it. It was cheesy 80's fare. If it is brought back it needs to be on Disney Channel. Visit this website please. http://www.fullhousereviewed.com Did she play the beast?
August 28, 201411 yr Member This show is horrible! John Stamos is literally the only thing good about it. It was cheesy 80's fare. If it is brought back it needs to be on Disney Channel. Visit this website please. http://www.fullhousereviewed.com No no no no no! Well Girl Meets World has been doing stellar It's horrible though
August 28, 201411 yr Member I don't think I've even ever made it through one full episode of FULL HOUSE.
August 29, 201411 yr Author Member It's horrible thoughTo you. Doesn't mean it's not doing well (Girl Meets World). Full House (a little bit too much cheese for me but there IS an audience for it) is actually doing well on Nick@Nite and pulling in around a million viewers a night and it airs a billion episodes in a row. I'd imagine Nickelodeon would be interested. They've been trying to launch sitcoms for a little while now. They tried Scott Baio and now are trying one of the Mowry girls, which seems to be doing better, I guess. Don't watch or follow the ratings for it. I could see it getting GMW #s if it's done right. I'd imagine it would focus on Candace Cameron Bure (who is all over the place after Dancing with the Stars ended) and DJ. Kimmy and Stephanie move in with DJ and they raise their kids together, or help one of them raise their kids. It's not too hard to sort of guess due to who is involved in the project. Only so much they can do. The show isn't for everyone, but it's a very popular show. VERY popular. It only ended on ABC because it was so expensive. The WB nearly picked it up when they were launching. Edited August 29, 201411 yr by KMan101
August 29, 201411 yr Member No no no no no! It's horrible though Uhm not it's not, otherwise it wouldn't be doing great ratings
August 29, 201411 yr Member I find Full House to be one of the worst shows ever created. I can see its appeal to children though, as it was very much geared to kids and tweens. But damn, as an adult with no children, I could never watch this show. It's beyond corny and unrealistic. Too much of this show can give me a tooth ache with its saccharine nature. This possible reboot needs to be on Disney or ABC Family, it could never do well on a network TV channel is this current climate.
August 29, 201411 yr Member Full House was terrible. I get that there's a lot of nostalgia value - for me too - but I cannot imagine reviving it with the same kind of godawful, trite writing. It's just camp now.
August 30, 201411 yr Member The only things I ever liked about this show the first time around were Bob Saget, Lori Laughlin, Candice Cameron, sometimes Dave Coulier. I'm tired of these remakes that never go anywhere and are a cheap cash grab. Frankly the first one ran too long as it was.
August 30, 201411 yr Member Frankly the first one ran too long as it was. Same. Weren't D.J. and Kimmy in college by the time the show was over? It seems to me that having the oldest child graduate from high school and leave the (full) house was the perfect time in which to wrap things up.
August 30, 201411 yr Member Well, the show was intent on cashing in on the Olsen twins direct to video success with tweens and kids for as long as they could.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.