Jump to content

Ratings from the 80's


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

@AbcNbc247 Fans of supercouple era Days that I know split that era into the Bo/Hope years (1983-1987) and the Steve/Kayla years (1987-1990). We know Steve/Kayla 1988 wedding got Days to #1 over Y&R. It will be interesting to see where Bo/Hope 1985 wedding ranks.

When it comes to 1980s soap couples based on ratings impact and soap press coverage, I'd say the top five in date order were Luke/Laura, Victor/Nikki, Bo/Hope, Cruz/Eden, Steve/Kayla.

Edited by kalbir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So, for the 1982-83 season including summer, we've got (vs. previous season):

1. GH 9.8 (-0.8)
2. AMC 9.2 (-0.1)
3. Y&R 8.2 (+0.8)
4. OLTL 8.0 (-0.8)
5. ATWT 7.5 (+0.4)
6. GL 7.4 (-0.2)
7. CAP 5.9 (+0.5)
7. DAYS 5.9 (+0.2)
9. RH 5.3 (-1.4)
10. AW 5.1 (+0.6)
11. LOV 3.8  
12. EON 3.7 (-1.0)
13. SFT 2.9 (-0.1)
14. TX 2.7 (-0.5)
15. DOC 1.6

(-1.2)

 

RH clearly the biggest crash that year. Something about Labine/Mayer's return was not connecting with the audience, combined with Y&R's return to form really hurting them. I'm not entirely surprised ABC was willing to push it out the way in favour of Loving at this point. Nice to see AW making such strides, moreso than even DAYS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's been interesting seeing how dramatic the fall in ratings was for Ryan's Hope—I expected it to be a little more gradual. The show was performing at roughly the same level as Guiding Light and As the World Turns as late as July 1982 (it came in at #5 the week of 6/28-7/2). Then it fell to the bottom of the middle of the pack in the fall (during the brief "Kirkland's Hope" period), and now it's been consistently #9 or #10 for most of 1983.

1983 was really a hallmark year for the show—Labine and Mayer refocused it in a tremendous way, cutting a lot of fat and rebuilding the core. The Charlotte Greer mystery that ran from April through August was the kind of well-plotted story that wasn't always present even in the show's 70s heyday. The Jack/Leigh and Siobhan/Bill romances were compelling. It's a shame that it seems to have had virtually no impact on the show's performance.

I'm curious to see how the show fares under Pat Falken Smith. There's a SOD article from mid-1984 in which the writer credits a rise in the ratings to her writing, and I wonder whether that will indeed be the case and whether it was sustained for any period of time (of course, any increase was negated by the time slot change in October 1984). Her first 4-6 months as headwriter largely continue stories started by Labine and Mayer, including the initial introduction of Jill's half-sister Maggie and the Bill/Siobhan/Joe/Jacqueline quadrangle—the show doesn't completely shift gears until February/March 1984.
 
A timeline in the BTS changes for anyone that's interested:
  • February 1982: Paul Avila Mayer is fired, leaving Claire Labine as sole headwriter.
  • September 1982: Claire Labine is fired, and Mary Ryan Munisteri's material begins airing.
  • February 1983: Claire Labine and Paul Avila Mayer are reinstated as headwriters. Much of the newer cast (from the "Kirkland's Hope" era) is fired, along with Kelli Maroney. Roscoe Born leaves the following month.
  • October 1983: Labine and Mayer are fired again and replaced with Pat Falken Smith. A smaller wave of exits ensues, impacting longer-term actors Ilene Kristen, Karen Morris-Gowdy, and Louise Shaffer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't this one of the two times when PFS was only HW of a specific show (GL & RH) for one 13 week work cycle? My information was that this was an example of a HW & a show just not being a good fit. What they wanted her to write she said was impossible. What she wanted to write they did not want. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy