Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soap Opera Network Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Y&R: TMZ reporting on Michael Muhney

Featured Replies

  • Member

This story that named Hunter King was definitely broken first on SON by SharonRocks. The story then spread like wildfire across the soaps boards.

In any case, AM does not work for Sony so MM fans' are sure to be disappointed that it cannot fire her since she works for CBS.

Edited by Ann_SS

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Views 198.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Member

If you don't care to discuss what I said, why respond to my post???? IMO she and anyone else who allowed a predator to work around his victim should be fired as well.

I do want to discuss it, but what are we discussing? AM being fired because of a leak that could have come from anywhere or those responsible for not firing the perv sooner?

it was broke in that first thread on SON about MM getting fired.

I cant remember the name of the poster who brought the news here

But it wasn't Angie McD? You see where I'm going with this?

  • Member

it was broke in that first thread on SON about MM getting fired.

I cant remember the name of the poster who brought the news here

Helpful hint: His or her name was not "Angelica McDaniel."

Who in the Christ is "Tommie Lightfoot" or whoever anyway? Wasn't that a funk artist in the '70s?

  • Member

I hope that MAB stan gets sued for that silly article. I notice he's already pulled it from his site. Must've been contacted by some lawyers.

the article is not pulled. The site must be getting too much traffic cause its slow, but its still there

This story that named Hunter King was definitely broken first on SON by SharonRocks. The story then spread like wildfire across the soaps boards.

In any case, AM does not work for Sony so MM fans' are sure to disappointed that it cannot fire her since she works for CBS.

SONY couldnt but could CBS. I seriously doubt anything will come of this . This just seems like it has 9 lives.

  • Member

John, let us spare you what little suspense your heart may yet harbor: Nothing will come of it. There is nothing to that talk. It's only being whipped up to try and cloud the issue and talk about anything other than Muhney and this accusation.

  • Member

Oh, so now folks have moved on to retaliation...trying to get others fired too. It's like the old, "well if he must go then so should everyone else involved." This attempt, at least, means that they accept he deserved to be fired. I wonder if her dismissal will make the Stans. feel better as they continue to watch the show after MMs last air date. I doubt it.

  • Member

You nailed it. There is a desperation to make "someone" pay other than MM. CBS is not going to fire AM over this no matter what fantasy scenario MM fans like John dream up. While AM is likely one of TMZ's sources, how on earth could CBS prove that? And why would it open itself up to a lawsuit from her over a no name actor like MM?

MM is gone deal with it!

Edited by Ann_SS

  • Member

Well, let's review:

  • Jeanne Cooper is dead, so she can't be made to "pay" unless they hold a seance
  • Sexual harassment workshops are pointless if you've fired the only alleged perpetrator on-set (other than the late Jeanne Cooper, a.k.a. History's Greatest Monster)
  • Angelica McDaniel cannot be proven to be the source of any leak, which began weeks ago prior to TMZ taking up the story
  • Hunter (Haley) King is not gonna be fired over it
  • Both Victoria Rowell and Michelle Stafford are no longer with the show
  • Eric Braeden and Peter Bergman's fistfight happened at least twenty years ago

So yeah, they're out of options. There's only one thing left to talk about: Muhney.

Edited by Vee

  • Member

I learned it here but it wasnt made public til a few days ago by TMZ

And just an FYI: Once anything hits the public, it's public.

  • Member

So much in that highlight Hollywood article makes little sense. But I found this sentence particularly ridiculous and irrational:

"The winner in this? TMZ, who has been ignoring soaps and specifically “The Young and the Restless” for years, they finally got the attention they wanted from soap fans. "

If TMZ is ignoring soaps and Y&R, why would they be coveting soap fan eyeballs to their site. The use of the word "finally" makes it seems like they were just pining for soap fan hits. It just doesn't follow. If they ignore soaps then they don't care about soap fans coming to their site!

  • Member

You nailed it. There is a desperation to make "someone" pay other than MM. CBS is not going to fire AM over this no matter what fantasy scenario MM fans like John dream up. While AM is likely one of TMZ's sources, how on earth could CBS prove that? And why would it open itself up to a lawsuit from her over a no name actor like MM?

MM is gone deal with it!

One last time please stop speaking for me in fact keep my name out of your mouth or I will report all your posts towards me as harrasment which is not allowed

Edited by John

  • Member

I learned it here but it wasnt made public til a few days ago by TMZ

Soapnet message boards are a public place...if you learned it here then so did TMZ.

  • Member

So much in that highlight Hollywood article makes little sense. But I found this sentence particularly ridiculous and irrational:

I only made it through the first three sentences. LOL!

  • Member

If you don't care to discuss what I said, why respond to my post???? IMO she and anyone else who allowed a predator to work around his victim should be fired as well.

And I'm discussing the article which said he was allowed to work there for 6 months.. I could care less about who leaked the story which is why I didn't comment on that part of the article. I commented on the part of the article that I felt was important.....and that was HHK being subjected to seeing her victimizer for 6 months after the incidents.

This could have been reported 6 months ago, but it often takes a while for HR to investigate the matter and come to a conclusion. King may have filed her complaint with HR/show bosses 6 months ago, but they obviously had to investigate the matter, which meant Muhney was allowed to stay on until they could come to the conclusion that King's accusations had some girth to it and the show needed to fire Muhney in order to protect their asses from a serious lawsuit.

I've seen this happen all the time. Not everyone gets fired ASAP, especially when there's so many parties involved.

  • Member

King may have filed her complaint with HR/show bosses 6 months ago, but they obviously had to investigate the matter, which meant Muhney was allowed to stay on until they could come to the conclusion that King's accusations had some girth to it

An unfortunate choice of words, I think we can all agree.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.