Jump to content

Y&R: November 2013 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 427
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I watched Monday's show in which Shelly Aultman is credited as the writer, instead of Josh Griffith. Only one part of it was semi-satisfying, but we've been teased so much before re: the same character that I am not holding my breath. Sad, because the mishandling of this character prevents his performance from meaning squat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jack taking up for Hilary calling Cane out for his hypocrisy was pricelss. Someone had to so I am glad they used someone else instead of Devon (like they usually do when they need a truth speaker)...I see fans speculating on Hilary and Jack becoming a couple. I pray not. Jack Abbot will be the death of the Hilary character. He will suck the life right out of her. Just no. I'd rather see her with that long faced Kyle.

But this does make me wonder if Peter Bergman is next on TPTB hit list...not sure if he will be open to that pairing or not being that he has been accused of being less than tolerant. But I guess that depends on how the story was written. His total distaste for the Luan and Keemo story and his insistence that fans forget Keemo's existence could have a lot to do with how Jack was written during the story...but then Jack has been written as a sap in the romance department for a while now so...it just makes me wonder if they are not trying to force him out (like I think they did MS)...we shall see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know whether he suggested it or not? I have never heard so. I just remember reading in an interview by Debbi Morgan that they both knew that when they broke them up that one of them was probably going to be sent away because of the hate mail. They both figured it would be her for obvious reasons (he had been on longer than she had). Turns out they were wrong. She was shocked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The pickings are kind of slim. He's been through a lot of the women of GC and the rest are either related or way too young. Not that I think poor Hilary should have to take him.

For real. If anyone should be lining up to give a con artist a second chance it's Cane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I liked Jack telling the sainted duo to stfu. They may be in the right to hate Hilary but I just don't care. Go play with the twins. I'm glad Hilary is starting to be moved away from from The Winters a bit. I like Jack taking on a mentor type role but he's too old and sappy for Hilary. I hope they don't turn romantic. Chem test her with Alex. Dude needs alittle fun. All work, no play sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • “I’m not a lifelong soap fan, but I sure am now,” Wolf tells PEOPLE about creating the documentary Soaps, which includes deep dives into the biggest and most successful soap operas in the industry, with a strong focus on The Bold and the Beautiful. “It reflects, in a broader way, the cultural significance of soap operas and the incredible task involved in bringing these stories to the screen every day.”
    • I have this for the 4th act on 11/9/88, which per my files, is the first time John and Stefano are in a scene together: Limo (Roman, Diana, Stefano, Milo) Then their second time together is 11/17/88 in the second-to-last act: ON LOCATION: Beach & Cliff (Diana, Roman, Stefano) I'd have to check the 2016 logs, so I don't know who shares scenes as easily in this year, but these are the last 4 episodes that John and Stefano were both in together: 1/8/16, 1/11/16, 3/1/16, 3/2/16.
    • I'm going to respond to you about this show. I've been accused of hating on it for some reason or another. But as a 53-year-old black man I do not hate this show at all. It heavily represents people like me, but I want it to be treated well and not just pushed with half-assedness, which is what I feel has happened on several occasions so far. Bad editing, bad cliffhangers, or no cliffhangers at all, disappearing characters with dropped storylines, etc. I can understand shows no longer wanting certain characters or  storylines, but why the "Judy Winslow" effect? I'm really finding it weird that Jacob doesn't mention his father or his detective partner. Jacob was smack dab in the middle of them both.
    • I love many things about BTG very much. For me, it's greatest strength is how the family relationships are so beautifully written. The deep love between family members while acknowledging each other's flaws--it's SO GOOD.  The best of the best is the two sister relationships: loving but very different sisters Dani and Nicole and adversarial sisters Kat and Eva. These two relationships can anchor the show for many years to come, in my opinion. (The one caveat is that the young and very talented Colby and Ambyr may want to leave the show sooner rather than later, but that's to be expected). My biggest problem with this show is this: Where are the romantic love stories? Where are the star-crossed lovers? Almost every character on this show is married, or in a committed relationship, or just fooling around. Right now the only potential for this are in the Ashley/Andre/Derek and Kat/Tomas/Eva situations. Like a lot of people, I feel the sooner they ditch Ashley and Derek, the better. I hate picking on actors, but the characters are so blah and bland it's like they're a parody of soap characters. I like Andre, and there's some indication they might have him become more serious about Dani, but I don't see that becoming a big love story. I could be wrong. Kat and Eva fighting over a man would be amazing. Over Tomas? No.  I've noticed on social media some people are starting to ship Kat and Jacob. I think that shows how much viewers long for a messy love story. There is much I enjoy about BTG and I have no intention of bailing on it. But over all my many years of watching soap operas, the thing that always got me the most excited about them was the question: "When are those two finally going to get together?"
    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 11/26/73-11/30/73 & 12/3/73-12/7/73:

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

        Some initial thoughts.   1) a Who's who back in the day with an assortment of well known performers. 2) Surprised Debra Messing would agree to play a conservative character 3) Not surprised a network didn't pick this up because showing a conservative that is human/likable is a no no in Hollywood LOL
    • Yes from when they went on Let’s Make a Deal too. Pam stole Forrester designs for Jackie M. Of course a month later we saw Nick, Lesley, Owen, and Bridget all exit in the same episode.
    • Great pairing that seemed to come out of the blue! Around that time, it felt like Sheffer/Goutman didn’t really know what to do with Emily or Hal. And KM and BH had surprisingly great chemistry. It was good for Emily especially because she was coming off those unsympathetic years with the Tom affair and then running the Intruder and essentially just being a busybody.
    • I think the issue with Lulu is less the character (which was the issue in the Julie Berman days under Guza II) and more the lack of nuance. The current GH team rarely writes nuance for any character or at least can't sustain it for long, or they reserve it for a favored few. I also think the rooting interest at GH BTS often remains on preferred characters or actors - BLQ/Setton - vs. Laura's kids. So it's easy to make Lulu the heavy if you think Brook Lynn and Chase are the money on this show. I don't, but I think FV does. And that's not to say I think Amanda Setton is bad in the role, or that I would get rid of BLQ. I don't trend towards either (though I do think that if Setton's personal beliefs keep getting in the way of material I would reluctantly recast). I think Brook Lynn is essential to use as a lead presently. But I don't think it needs to be the black and white dichotomy of suffering young matriarch BLQ and aggressor Lulu. While it's good that unlike in the Guza years they can recognize that Lulu can be obnoxious and rash, can be her own worst enemy and that that is part of the character, it can be toned down or given more layers than it has of late. There's nothing wrong there the writing can't fix.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy