Jump to content

B&B: September 2013 Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I don't like Quinn at all. My problem isn't that Rena Sofer is a bad actress, I just don't think she's needed in most of the roles she's cast for. Pam and Donna are both more interesting choices if they want to give Eric a love interest. And then you have Felicia who fills the type they're trying to mold her into.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
This. She is needed for balance and to help keep Brooke in check. Katie is weak and with Steph gone, no one really calls Brooke out like Taylor. Instead we now have her as this egomaniac pig who thinks she's unstoppable. I liked how Taylor served as a counterpart to Brooke and she also wasn't scared to get in Bill's face and check him as well
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, Rena's face is still in tact, and that is the only difference between her and Hunter. The "acting" for both is laughable! I think Taylor had to go because in order to sell Brooke as this irresistible goddess, you have to either totally write Taylor out of character or get rid of her because she is Brooke's only opposition. Scuzzard Brooke has been winning over everyone in conversations in regards to Bill to where it is just about water under the bridge. Taylor would be the only character who really takes the audience there, so she had to go.

Wyatt read Liam's ass like he should have been read long ago, but if you really look at it, not one person has really let Brooke have it. Have they? That is intentional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
well weak ass Katie tried and she had this happen to her

14c4phg.gif

LMAO, weak ass bitch laugh.png

Man, Id want that but apparently the show doesn't want her. She revealed that she tried to reach out to them but that there was no communication back from there end. It was shameful how they got rid of her and the character but typical of B&B in recent years

http://theboldandthebewtiful.freeforums.org/hunter-s-shocking-reveal-t8783.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't need her to return unless she is going to give Brooke the verbal beat down she deserves. But did they write the character out? I remember one of the other characters saying, after the reveal, that Taylor was in her office. We won't hear about her often, but I don't believe the character was written out. Someone, please correct me if I'm mistaken.

But they never really let Katie take us there and really read Brooke for the filth that she is. Katie ends up taking partial responsibility and talk about their relationship never being the same. No one has really gone there because the writers don't want them to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good thing I can get there all on my own then. I don't need a character on this show to tell me how vile and filthy Brill is. It would certainly be nice, since when Brooke starts talking about their relationship, I feel like I'm living in an alternate reality. Still no matter how many characters approve, I will always see them as trashy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
I didn't see it but apparently in a conversation with Brooke, Eric mentioned that Taylor walked out on him. They are broken up and she is still allegedly still living in LA, just offscreen

What more do you need? Katie called her a slut and called her out on jumping from guy to guy. Sure she's backed down but its not like she hasn't ripped into Brooke at all.

I think the show missed a big opportunity to make this a scandal. Seriously, how the heck can Bill be fired, go through a divorce with Katie (who's replaced him as CEO) and now living with her sister, and that not be a scandal? Why aren't the reports all over them and why isn't Brooke being trashed around LA for the slut that she is? That makes NO sens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It definitely did. Nothing major, but I clocked the minor changes too. Passions did something similar with its theme in the later years and people thought I was crazy, but the nuances are there if you're paying attention. 
    • What? A nice little mini-marathon of catching up before work.    YES, PLEASE. 
    • I guess they copied literally everything from that C&R scene, the dialogue etc 
    • And even then...you have to wait a couple of weeks to be sure he's actually dead.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Apparently. lol.  Well you know I don't mind standing also with the cheese so  
    • I have nothing to add. Everything you said is on point, and I don't know whether to laugh hysterically at it or throw things at the television. I do know it's terrible soap opera.  
    • Characterization: - I realized I have PTSD from Ted #1’s constant swaying. The moment I saw NuTed, I actually caught myself thinking, “Why isn’t he rocking?” - Leslie makes very little sense from a storytelling perspective unless she’s completely psychotic. What was she hoping to achieve with all her dramatic reveals and aliases? Also… who wouldn’t put two and two together after Laura’s accident? - Anita and Dani come across as mean-spirited, and honestly, the Duprees should just be portrayed as full-on villains. Been saying this since day one—remember when Dani punched Haley and the whole Dupree clan just walked away from her with that “shame on you” look? Wrong on so many levels. Glad others are finally seeing it too. - Mona is sanctimonious and I can’t stand her. She’s the worst kind of person: lower-to-middle class but constantly making excuses for the rich. - Call me crazy, but I’m actually enjoying Ashley and Derek’s storyline. I’ll take this neurotic OCD queen over the sanctimonious, multi-talented nurse any day. Plus, soap couples are usually so plastic. They deal with insane drama but never go to the bathroom, never plan a weekend away. Look at Kat and Tomas—every scene is just them planning lunch or dinner…! - Btw by now André seems bored af by Ashley.   WTF Moments: - No young woman would be even remotely interested in going to a casino (looking at Eva). And it’s wild how the show is treating gambling like it’s some kind of therapeutic hobby—like retail therapy or something. - What are they doing with Smitty’s eyebrows… and more importantly, why?   Parallels with Other Soaps: - I like Nicole, but she reinforces my belief that soaps should never include psychiatrists. If they’re portrayed accurately, they ruin the fun by rationalizing everyone’s childish and selfish behavior. If they’re portrayed inaccurately (hi Taylor from B&B), it’s equally bad. - Anita’s story is giving major SSM vibes from 2017‘s Y&R, when Victor got Nikki to start playing the piano again.  - Karla played a model on B&B too…

      Please register in order to view this content

        Direction & Continuity: - Pascarelli is hands down the worst director this show has. - Wednesday’s episode started with a nighttime establishing shot of Orphey Gene’s… but all the scenes that followed were clearly set in daytime—until halfway through the episode, when it suddenly switched back to night. - The picture on the piano at the Duprees’ house shows two little girls and two little boys. Who are the boys? One could be Martin (or Tyrell?), but who’s the other kid? (And speaking of pictures… no one under 50 is walking around with a printed photo in their pocket. But I digress.) - I love catching the time on the phones when they pop up onscreen. Friday’s episode was supposedly set before lunch, but Vernon’s phone said 3:15 in one scene and 3:50 in the next. A few scenes later, Kat is playing Leslie’s audio for Jacob and her phone shows 10:40. Cool. 
    • I forget that throughout the 80’s the TV seasons were officially over in April. Not sure why that was the case but it wasn’t until the mid-90’s that May Sweeps became a real official thing.  Because my teenage self stayed home often on Saturday nights in the early 90’s I watched Empty Nest just about every night to the bitter end, I do actually always felt a bit sad whenever I see that GG ep knowing that Rita’s character will die with that last line “Good night!” For years I admit I had the Mandela effect that Mulligan was in the episode before I finally caught it again on Lifetime.    And yes lol I don’t care for David Leisure’s character in the episode but somehow was funnier than anything on Empty Nest. Same when Charley crossed over for Dorothy’s Jeopardy dream. 
    • Jon Lindstrom proved with Ryan Chamberlain on GH that he can play menacing and evil. He's not doing it here, and I think it's a combination of writing and performance.   To be fair, Longoria has modeled and has represented major companies like L'Oreal, but she was never a runway model. I don't have any problem with seeing Dani as a runway model. I think it's more than possible, and I don't understand anyone criticizing her look. I actually have a bigger problem with the whole "Anita is an EGOT" thing. I think it goes way too far. Give her a Grammy. Say she was nominated for a Tony, or even won. But an EGOT winner? No.   The fact that you're using DAYS to defend a BTG set is telling, since we all know DAYS is poverty level soapdom. I expect so much more and better from Gates.     I can't help it, but I'm LOL at the people defending that backroom bingo hall casino and making excuses for it. It's hilariously bad.  
    • If NBC could have for seen the ratings of Lovers & Friends (the replacement for Somerset).. they would have for sure kept Somerset on the air longer. https://jason47.com/days/ratings1976.html  (ratings for Somerset in the final year) https://jason47.com/days/ratings1977.html (ratings for Lovers & Friends short run...getting as low as a 2 rating).  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy