Jump to content

BREAKING NEWS: Prospect Park Names New Head Writers of BOTH ‘All My Children’ and ‘One Life to Live’


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 288
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

I think one of the big issues with OLTL is that by virtue of picking up in real time, they've been forced to deal with the results of the GH crossover. Not just the story written on the show but the backstage contract stuff. AMC's big issue (the time jump) was entirely of their own making so they haven't had to deal with another writer's influence on their characters and canvas.

  • Members
Posted

That's a good point I handn't considered, Marceline - the effects of the legal wrangling with ABC.... overall, I guess that could negate their direction with the story. But it doesn't explain how there's something missing in the tone of the writing, nor things like the uneven responses of some characters to Victor's return. Viki & Clint shrugged as if he should have shown up months ago, lol.... and Sam didn't seem to know he'd ever been "dead!"

And then there's the writer's approach to "edgy" and "real" young characters. I still can't wrap my mind around Danielle telling the guys not to use her moisturizer to masturbate, even if it was "joking" - unless the writers are working overtime to show us that Dani has descended into a trashy, wannabe Ke$ha. I get that she's doing drugs, and that Matthew says "sh_t" every other sentence with various inflections and foreign accents... But in the process, the writers have been making those characters vacuous, unlikable, and worst of all, one-dimensional. I don't blame the actors at all... Hopefully the new writers see that deficit and have a plan to repair it.

  • Members
Posted

I don't think that's Ke$ha and I don't think they're unlikable or vacuous. That's how young people talk, and that's what they talk about. They're sometimes reckless or selfish, they sometimes shirk their responsibilities or play drinking games but that's all pretty real. And it's on course for them to develop and grow.

  • Members
Posted

To some extent, I agree with you, Vee... I happen to work with high school age students now. They can be reckless and selfish. But by far, most girls would gross out over what Dani said... not introduce it into a conversation herself. The problem I see is that, with these characters - Matthew and Dani in particular, as they're pre-established - is that these apartment scenes comes off as disingenuous (unlike Dani's overdose scenes, which I thought played very well) and one dimensional. Are Dani's & Matt's lust fantasies of each other entirely sexual? That would be inconsistent with their history, but so far, it sure seems that way with what's in the script.

Since I see a bit of regression in their characters, I absolutely want your last sentence to be true - that it's on course for them to develop and grow. And I think it will. I'm not shooting down the show. I love OLTL. But I know it can be much better than what we've been seeing, and I look forward to the new head writers taking it there - fingers crossed!

  • Members
Posted

Well, again, they're not high schoolers. They're twentysomethings who are ostensibly 'adults,' but in the case of Matthew and Dani (unlike Jeffrey and Destiny) they're clearly barely ready for it. Everything is partying and sex and new experiences, the real world's not something they know how to cope with yet. I think that's something a lot of people can relate to. I don't know why it would be disenguous for them to sexually desire one another and have those kind of carnal fantasies. At that age, only network soap kids are dreaming of settling down, getting married and popping out babies.

I don't think the apartment stuff is one-dimensional, but I do think it's often relatively plotless - it's a lot of vignettes and character building stuff, which I can understand people not liking whether due to the tenor or tone of the scenes, or the age grouping. For me I think it just keeps building on these characters in a way we don't see in soaps today, and also, with a lighter touch, building towards the inevitable conflicts over Destiny between the men, and the romance between Matt and Dani. I think the characters feel far more real and complex than any youth scene I've seen in soaps in a very long time.

  • Members
Posted

Believe me, the high-schoolers I've worked with are typically less sophisticated / more crass before they get to college, lol... (I've had the opportunity to see some of them transition.) I want to be clear that nothing about what's happening in those scenes offend my sensibilities, they just don't necessarily - at least for me - always ring true to the characters I'd previously watched. Maybe that's why I find Jeffrey to be the most real of the three. You see it as Matthew & Dani not being ready for adulthood, and that's a valid point. I just think there's more to them than what we are currently seeing. And I plan on sticking around to see it. wink.png

ETA: I saw your post pre-edit, Vee, sorry! ... By "disingenuous," I meant some of the pointless conversation scenes that I'd referenced before... not the sex fantasies. With those, I just want to see on the screen, in the subtext, that there's more to Matt & Dani than just getting their groove on - and I'm sure we will...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I did not care, just clarifying that was the discussion point. If there are ice cream bars in Statesville I am sure there is a full spa
    • Seeing Peter Bergman (Jack) and Melody Thomas Scott (Nikki) act opposite each other really makes me mad that their short-lived reunion in 2012 was just that... short-lived. I've always loved the Jack/Nikki pairing.
    • No.  I recall there was also a mention about how distracting it was EOB's Gwen wasn't wearing nail polish as well.  That it was someone's pet peeve. And, yes, the fact characters can have a manicure in prison is the wildest continuity issue here.
    • Can anyone remember Mary Ellen Stuart's run as Jenny? I'm trying to fill in the cracks for missing stuff that we overlooked.  Bulletpoints:  * Dated Ross * Rusty's police partner * Directly responsible for Dinah coming forward about George Stewart (Cam's father)
    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton twirling his invisible moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy