Jump to content

Prospect Park Sues ABC Over ‘One Life To Live’ & ‘All My Children’ Licensing Agreement


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

I don't agree. I think this slight embarrassment with the 3 characters who ate up way too much airtime only to never have existed is far better than the headache of sharing the 3 in the long run. Besides, the schlock that FRon put out everday? At least there was a reason for this particular swill! ABC/GH made a good decision, THIS TIME.

  • Replies 725
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

Oh, I think they quite disagree. I think they would take those three characters back in under a heartbeat if they only could. Their problem was they were no longer able to be the sole arbiter of their stories and futures, and that was not something they were willing to accept.

The irony is it looks like they never actually had those rights to begin with.

  • Members
Posted

They had Starr, John, Cole, Hope, Blair, Todd & Tea in a limited capacity for one year. Thats why with Tomas they fucked up and then there is this from July 2012

http://xfinity.comcast.net/blogs/tv/2012/07/27/deep-soap-why-one-oltl-star-wont-be-coming-to-gh-and-other-tca-bombshells/

There also finally will be a resolution to the cliffhanger from the final episode of “One Life to Live” in which viewers learned that the presumed dead Victor (Trevor St. John), was very much alive. “Yes [Todd will learn he did not kill Victor]. Absolutely. See, we have all these great surprises that can be played out. So the future is very bright. We’re really excited about it.”

They were gonna reveal Victor alive and they never rights to that role. SMH

Also dont get why FV didnt understand this:

All I’ll say is Melissa Archer is a very close friend of mine and I adore her.”

Given that Easton, and two other OLTL alums who have appeared on GH — Kassie DePaiva (Blair) and Florencia Lozano — had also signed on with Prospect Park, it’s unclear why Archer has contractual stipulations that the others do not, or why Prospect Park would consider enforcing its contract when the online version of OLTL will clearly never happen. So when will Archer be available? “I don’t know. I wish I did because I could say. I’m not afraid to say it. I just don’t want to speak out of turn and say the wrong thing.”

Probably because Natalie was never LOANED to you, Frank you arogant [!@#$%^&*]

  • Members
Posted

Yeah, they wanted them back but eventually realized that surrendering that kind of control was a bad idea. Hate to say it, but I agree. FRon are just arrogant enough to think they have the last laugh (they probably do). All 3 have been filming and 2 of them will begin with quite a bit of airtime as one (you know who) has filmed with at least 7 different people already. Expect to see him for at least a solid week 1/2 or 2 when he returns.

  • Members
Posted

PP was gonna share but PP stipulated that Starr John & Todd cant appear on GH on days they are on OLTL. That makes perfect sense, HOWEVER, ABC didnt want to figure out the scheduling. Boo Hoo ABC

  • Members
Posted

It made sense to no one to have the characters appear on the same day on 2 different shows. The problem was sharing the 3 long term. Bad idea, and this is really for the best.

  • Members
Posted
. It sounds like a headache especially with unplanned preemptions. Is ABC supposed to be bound by contract and do massive last minute cuts and changes when that arises? That stipulation has too much potential to make a mess out if things. PP would likely hold that in their back pocket and sue later on bc the characters aired concurrently on same days
  • Members
Posted

I stopped reading halfway through the thread as it got extremely repetitive...has there been any new news or is it the same five people repeating themselves to each other?

  • Members
Posted

I'll bet Johnny is pissed about that, too.

  • Members
Posted

LOL I remember when people tried to say it wasn't PP that was keeping Kassie from being on GH full time like she pushed for. People were trying to blame Frank and Ron and say it was cause Ron wanted Tarly so they didn't want Blair around full time.

now we know better ;)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Letting Brennan put it in yet again while smirking over his shoulder... any day now! She's got him just where she wants him! I do think ol' Jack will be dead by February at the absolute latest. They have set him up as a counter-heavy to Sidwell, forcing poor Joss to work his latest scheme. At which point I still deeply fear we will be subject to Valentin and Carly, partners in crime to lovers, possibly out to find out 'who killed Jack'. Anna was at her best keeping Sonny at arm's length and often somewhat cold, which she only really did (for better or worse) during Carlivati's tenure. But Finola got too emotional over Sonny, Jason, etc. and was allowed to do that onscreen too much long ago. Mulcahey brought some of that steel back, though Finola still managed to choke or quietly sob through some of that material as Anna found her way there lol. She's a brilliant actress and she did a good job with that stuff in '24, but now we're back to the same old and it humiliates the character whether she knows it or not.
    • Listen, I am all for Laura Wright wearing silly wigs and glasses if there was a point.  So far she's just been nice to Brennan and made out with him.  How evil lol!!  Even though I have been told Brennan loves her the writing was never there.  It's so low stakes.  Carly should maybe talk to her daughter and have an adult conversation instead. Laura and Anna look foolish.  I really don't have an issue with either being friendly or at least having some affection for Sonny.  I don't get both of them wanting to have a parade to announce how much they love him and how valuable the friendship is.  C'mon, Laura basically tolerated Sonny because of Luke until Lulu/Dante got together.  Anna likes Sonny because Robin did?  There really isn't much more of a reason for Anna to give him the time of day besides that.  They aren't lifelong buddies.
    • It is so dumb and is dragging on already after a couple weeks. By the time Carly wraps this up Joss will be running the local branch office. And yes, Laura deserves better. It's like they tripled down on this Sonny apologia stuff with her and Anna after the Mulcahey saga.
    • A white twunk with no purpose?? On Days of our Lives??!!
    • It feels like the show hired Hank Northrop first and are still deciding what to do with him lol. I don't have a judgement on the character yet, but this non-story (so far) has been happening for at least a month and he's only made 2 appearances lol. Also, this may be a stupid question, but is Chad's name really Chadwick?  I can't find any evidence of that in a quick google search, so I assume it's just a silly nickname Leo calls him?  I feel like I've heard other characters (EJ?) call him that though too.
    • I know Anita mentioned that she no longer was investing in the trust, while Leslie had stated that the interest was multiplying at a decent rate... but I do have a feeling she'll wipe through the trust in a short amount of time with the amount of spending she's doing. The show always throws in tiny nuggets of foreshadowing and having Anita's remark and Eva warning her mother not to overdo the spending tells me that Leslie will be blowing through that money eventually.
    • I honestly don't care if Laura is friends with Sonny.  She's been friends with him for decades.  The way she goes about the friendship is stupid.   She has no sense of self-preservation or awareness about the optics of parading her friendship with Sonny around town.  She practically celebrates it.  There's no reason in the world she can't just keep the friendship low key and explain they share a grandchild and frame the relationship that way.  A lot of Laura's choices, like getting into a public fight with Dalton, just make her look silly and like a fairly incompetent mayor. Carly is another PC lady that's starting to look silly.  I know she's explained her plan a lot, but it's still stupid and moving at a glacial pace.  If Joss is 45 by the time her revenge plot unfolds, what's the point?  Just dump Brennen and move on please.
    • On that same note, it's astounding to have mobster Sonny in the same office with Mayor Laura chatting it up about their mutual grandson. Think about the reaction if John Gotti and Mayor Eric Adams had a friendship

      Please register in order to view this content

      ?? I guess the Logic behind Sonny & Jason acceptance is like when i saw a documentary where FBI agents said they'd rather deal with the mafia than terrorists or cartels---they're the "lesser of 3 evils". Anyway I'm about 30 years late on this convo.
    • Im confused. Does Jessica know anything about June's relation to Tyrell? At the start of the episode, it seemed like June was gonna slip that he was her son but she caught herself but later in the episode she referred to him as "my boy" and Jessica had no reaction like that wasnt a surprise to her No, Anita was putting money in the account every 6 months but we werent told how much was in it when Leslie became a beneficiary. The show has set it up that it was multiplying based off the interest so that its really worth quite alot now. I dont buy it but thats what they've told us
    • What was the point in Lori's return as Mrs. Max Hollister? That little story never made much sense to me.  Were there plans for a permanent return? Or even a new family with her as the matriarch?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy