Jump to content

GH: Classic Thread


Max

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Kin was the hot hearthrob at the time, although he was being diminished by Geary and the turn in writing away from Scotty and Laura.

I'm sure he was a little miffed that he was no longer the center of that story.

His contract was up and P&G offered him a record salary to move to Texas.

So he probably thought why not?

It was only for a year and as it happened he went back to GH anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Doesn’t Luke bring Laura flowers after the rape?  She is still in the hospital.  I think it was pretty clear as early as that moment the show wanted Luke to be seen as tortured by what he had done to her.  Even though he still acts awful towards her after that, I think the writing was already on the wall.

I still find it disgusting that people would yell rape me to Tony at events.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Setting aside the rape for a moment, Luke's motives to flip on the mob were also only logical if the writers were trying to rehabilitate the character. 

Luke came to town with a history of mob connections.  He benefited from the mob's involvement with the disco, and it wasn't as if he was an entertainment entreprenour who suddenly had to pay for mob protection, he worked at the disco in hopes of moving up in the organization.  So, to suddenly gain a conscience and try to bring down the mob seemed to come out of nowhere.

The murder of Tony and his forced marriage to Jennifer were further motives to want revenge.  However, the Luke who arrived in Port Charles originally did not have the morals to want bring the mob to justice.  I could understand if Luke wanted to kill Frank, but it seemed implausible that he would work with legal authorities to get him arrested. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Can we discuss the legal and economic realities of Port Charles mobsters?

Example #1, Frank Smith - The Smith Organization was shown to be involved in classic mob activities including money laundering and gun running.  However, Luke stole Franks's black book from his office on Founder's Day.  It does not take a legal scholar to know that stolen evidence is inadmissible at trial.  Then, Luke "decoded" the book to find gold bouillon hidden in a statue.   Correct me if I am wrong, but, while hiding gold in a statue is not a smart investment strategy, there is nothing inherently illegal about the practice.  So, how did this bring down Frank's mob?  Admittedly, Frank hired hitmen to kill Luke which would be cause for prosecution, but the stolen evidence would undoubtedly effect that case because the prosecution could not provide evidence of motive.

Example #2 Sonny Corinthos.  So, we know that Sonny is an ethical mobster because he refuses to engage in selling drugs or guns.  Thus, most of his operation is involved in the importation of coffee through the port of Port Charles.  Presumably, because it is illegal, he is importing coffee but not paying tariffs on the import.  I googled it and the tariff for coffee is 0.3464% of the cost.  So, even it was being illegally imported, nobody would be saving much on the cost of the coffee bean.  The other logical flaw in this business plan would be finding a buyer.  Large coffeehouses would not buy non-tariffed good because they have to report their sales to the IRS.  Smaller chains could not buy enough coffee to support the import, warehousing, and transport of the goods (as everyone who has ever bought coffee beans knows, they go bad after a short shelf life).  So, how is this considered mafia tactics?  They don't charge local business for protection.  They don't engage in racketeering or gambling.  Where's the organized crime here versus just a company with a very flawed infrastructure? 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't believe for one second Sonny's organization doesn't work with drugs and guns. My personal take has always been that he takes a cut of them through subsidiaries and other partners, turns his head and pretends.

I was under the impression Sonny has always been named as being involved in racketeering and gambling. They've gone after him on RICO charges more than once. I remember intimations that he used to be involved in the sex work trade in PC too and 'keeping the girls safe', but they may have dialed back on that in recent years.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He def was dealing in the sex trade when he first appeared.

Again, they make a point of saying no drugs or guns.  I know they say coffee but he literally could be selling fake handbags for all we know.  There are a lot of things that could possibly be imported and it's just not exciting, but there are ways for him to make money.

I also thought there were arms being shipped back in the day in the 90's and Rivera dealt with drugs and weapons and Sonny inherited that so he either changed that entire cartel and process or it's just still happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy