Jump to content

DAYS: Supercouple Returns


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I never liked John and Marlena as a couple so I don't want to see more of that. I did enjoy John during the last year he was on the show when he was non-John so I wish there would be more of that John but I'm not counting on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I feel like this is really bad backtracking.

I thought the show made a bold decision when they let these two crap, overpaid, and overrated actors go. The decision paid off too, as ratings went up during that time, and no one can claim ratings have fallen in recent times because these two aren't on the show. Bottom like is DAYS doesn't need these characters to survive, its already proved that. Bringing them back reeks of desperation and admitting that the bold decision they made (that really had no impact on the show anyway) was all for nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hall and Hogestyn are two of the most retched popular daytime actors I've ever seen. If there's a reason why the general public and mainstream entertainment industry give soap actors a bad name, it's these two who helped craft that reputation. I will never understand their supposed popularity, nor do I want to.

Dee Hall seems to be cool as a person, but as an actress? Forget about it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

By the same token while no one can claim fell because of a lack of them, no one can claim ratings rose for the same lack of them either.

Why is it backtracking to bring back Marlena and John, but not backtracking to bring back Jennifer and Jack? Perhaps there is a story they have in mind for these two? Do we really need to watch tales of Nicole and EJ for yet another year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In other words, either way, John and Marlena make no difference, so why bring them back when cutting them saved the show so much money to begin with?

And as of now this sounds like a short term engagement, so why even bother?

Jack and Jennifer were never billed as ultimate stars of this show, as John and Marlena often are. If anything, Jack and Jennifer played second fiddle to John and Marlena and Bo and Hope for years, and are nowhere near as overrated and overexposed.

The show initially got rid of Hall and Hogestyn to save itself from cancellation and budget woes, and they had no problem saying so openly to the press and going on about how the show wasn't built around famous faces to keep it alive. So, in my view, this is huge backtracking.

I agree, the show sucks, but that doesn't mean John and Marlena are the answer either. I just hope the writing is there for them...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would, in DAYS case, think its their small budget, which these two were fired to save.

I don't know how much of a story they can tell in the summer, but I wish them luck. I hope the writing is there, or else they'll be fired and blamed for the writing (as Sorel and Chappell are).

Of course, I guess there is always room for an extension, but still, it only sounds like (for now) they're only back for a summer story. If that holds, it will be a great waste of money and time.

Other than that, their departure proved they had no impact on the ratings. DAYS proved that they could fire popular stars and survive, I feel like this dismantles that. If the show were better written, they wouldn't need this.

Corday Productions has a 1% stake, so in other words, nothing substantial.

I do know that a lot of the contracts at the show are though the Bell Dramatic Serial Company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Community Posts

    • Maybe I got carried away

      Please register in order to view this content

      I just hate this storyline so much. And I really, really hate when awful people keep getting rewarded for their awful behavior. Both in real life and in fiction. It’s not right. Say what you will about Sonny and Carly, but they’ve at least somewhat paid for their awful behavior. Not as much as they should but it was still more than this. How can anyone treat someone that they claim to care about so terribly? And then just not care at all about that person or what they did to them? Over at Days, I hated it when Ciara did it to Theo and I hated it when Craig did it to Nancy. But Joss is worse than the two of them put together. It’s like she not even human. I find her to be even worse than Carly. I know Carly has problems being a decent person too, but she would never treat the people that she says she cares about the way that Joss treated Cam and now to a lesser extent, Spencer and Michael. And honestly, I want Joss to suffer worse than any person on GH ever has.  I have absolutely no idea what the writers, or Frank are thinking with the way this storyline is being written. And do they seriously think that this consolation prize crap of Cam going to play soccer for Stanford (and Trina constantly reminding us of it) makes everything better? It doesn’t. 
    • I hesitate to post Thompson, who is just a gleeful gossip hound. But this thread is instructive, even if much of it is stuff we all could've told the GOP and the NY Times six months ago.  
    • Sure. They've been sent to live on a farm with other not gone actors where they can run and play.
    • From what I can find, Tim was datie Evie but got a job offer out of town that was too good to pass up and left in Nov 76. No mention of Pam and no reason I could see that a marriage would be mentioned later. I just checked Soap Central and there is an entry stating Evie left town and Pam and Tim were married. Not so.This is not the first false entry I have come across at that site. Someone takes delight at posting false info.
    • She's under Ryan (I added this).  Pam married Tim at some point-- from what I read. If not, let me know.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy