Members DeeeDee Posted June 18, 2011 Members Share Posted June 18, 2011 Exactly. After years of nobody (other actors, most fans & the soap press) caring about Y&R it's become Shady Pines for out of work soap actors with grudges. They should be hiring Robin Strasser any day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members P.J. Posted June 18, 2011 Members Share Posted June 18, 2011 Can't we at least agree that in the 1980's (when Diane was introduced), a model's career was considered over by their mid-20's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DeeeDee Posted June 18, 2011 Members Share Posted June 18, 2011 We can agree that runway models careers are usually over by their mid/late 20's. But Diane was never a runway model thus not over the hill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members LoyaltoAMC Posted June 18, 2011 Members Share Posted June 18, 2011 I think the only reason they hired Maura was to try and get some ATWT viewers. I'm sure they did research and conducted focus groups to determine which ATWT refugee could best be counted on to deliver some new viewers, just as they're probably doing now with AMC and OLTL actors. I think the whole procees was all very calcutated. That's the cynic in me talking, I guess. And for whatever reason, the writing, her performance...none of it ever gelled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted June 18, 2011 Members Share Posted June 18, 2011 I think that is probably a big reason for her hiring. It's a vulture mentality, and it's always the same sad story because people who don't watch Y&R that much talk up about how fantastic is and _____'s loss is Y&R's gain, and then the stunts wear off and the daily grind of ugliness that is today's Y&R take their toll, and it's time for a new stunt casting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members juniorz1 Posted June 19, 2011 Author Members Share Posted June 19, 2011 I don't think she did- I believe it was included in this part of the quote: Uh, I don't consider any of her performances to be comatose and that crack about the only layers she had were in her hair is all kinds of wrong. The recast may have not been perfect, mainly like you and others have said because of the writing- but Maura wasn't, hasn't been, and never will be a lazy actress. She doesn't tank storylines either, unlike co-stars Braeden, Stafford, and Muhney. But then again, you had THIS to say about Genie's performance as Shriekavieve: So your opinons about the acting on Y&R aren't really all that credible IMO. Brava! But I do think she has some fire chemistry with Morrow. Exactly. This show is pure crap and you're right that it makes it all the more depressing that the show used to be the creme de la creme. :lol: And your credibility falls further down the gutter. Maura may have lacked a lot of things on Y&R but FIRE ain't one of em. Girl is a ball of freaking fire, no matter how much and how often the writing failed her. +1 But I do see a difference: Diane was NEVER a slut nor did she use sex to gain money like a common hooker. She always had a sexuality that she used to her advantage with men, but not like this. The Diane of old NEVER would have shown up to Grambo's in a trench coat and removed it to reveal her bright red and black lace bra and panties like this version did. It just wasn't and isn't her style. No doubt, ESPECIALLY when all it does is prove how atrocious the writing actually is, considering these talented, A-list actors can't even bring it to life and make it work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alphanguy74 Posted June 19, 2011 Members Share Posted June 19, 2011 True... Cheryl Tiegs was in her early thirties when she did that huge campaign for Sears back in 1979-82. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alphanguy74 Posted June 19, 2011 Members Share Posted June 19, 2011 Are we talking about the same Diane who screwed Jack the night before his wedding? And I hate to tell you, but she DID use sex to gain career placement/money. By sleeping with Jack, she persuaded him to build an entire Jabot advertizing campaign around her, and not Chris Brooks who his father wanted to head up the campaign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alphanguy74 Posted June 19, 2011 Members Share Posted June 19, 2011 that's exactly why they did it, and the problem keeps being that they are STUPID and don't realize that it NEVER works. If they wanted to snag some ATWT veiwers, they needed to sit down with Proctor and Gamble and hammer out a deal and get one or two of ATWT's CHARACTERS and bring them over to Y&R (along with the actors who play them, of course) P&G would do it, they would get some money for doing virtually nothing, and milk a bit more revenue out of a completely dead property. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DeeeDee Posted June 19, 2011 Members Share Posted June 19, 2011 Diane used sex ONCE to get her foot in the door (and even then she ended up falling for Jack) unlike characters like Jill & Lauren who constantly used/uses sex to get what they want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members juniorz1 Posted June 19, 2011 Author Members Share Posted June 19, 2011 I admit I wasn't watching then, but from what I've read of the character at the time, that was one isolated incident. When Alex Donnelly returned in the 90s, there was none of that. Diane was a smart, calculated businesswoman. Yes, she had some tricks up her sleeves and did sleep with Jack and Victor, but she didn't go whoring around town. She did NOT overtly use sex to get what she wanted- she relied moreso on her brains and savvy. The story you're talking about took place nearly 30 years ago and I don't find it relevant. Had she seduced and banged the hell out of John Abbott back then, maybe you'd have something there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DeeeDee Posted June 19, 2011 Members Share Posted June 19, 2011 She was the same way initially too. She always about using her intelligence first & sex as a last resort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members P.J. Posted June 19, 2011 Members Share Posted June 19, 2011 It was hardly one incident---she had an extended affair with Jack while he was married to Patty. She then married Andy and cheated on him with Jack. I understand that she returned to town with a career under her belt. But it's not fair either to simply throw out segments of her history because it was so long ago. She used whatever she had to her advantage. In that respect, I don't see a difference in Diane's actions from then to now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DeeeDee Posted June 19, 2011 Members Share Posted June 19, 2011 It was totally one incident. The initial sex with Jack was to get Diane in the door at Jabot. The rest of their affair she had genuine feelings for him & she cheated on Andy BECAUSE she still had feelings for Jack (despite loving Andy too) so nobody is "throwing out segments of her history because it was long ago". Also the difference between Diane then & Maura's Diane is that Diane (outside of that one initial instance) only used sex as a last resort. Not so much with Maura's Diane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members LoyaltoAMC Posted June 19, 2011 Members Share Posted June 19, 2011 Did Maura and Scott relocate to LA when she got Y&R? If so, it's a shame they gave up their lives in NYC, though I guess her best chance, probably her only chance, for work, is in LA, whether it be soaps or prime time. Wonder if Frons is considering her for the rumored Kate recast on GH. That might be a role better suited for her, and I could see her having chem with Maurice. Of course, GH will probably be off the air by Sept 2012, so not sure if that would be a good move for her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.