Jack's storyline about his heart condition is just starting and will be quickly dropped. 😂

This is a compilation tape the uploader made back in the day for this storyline.

Did anybody buy Phoebe and Wade? I can only recall negative feedback.

40 minutes ago, Paul Raven said:

Did anybody buy Phoebe and Wade? I can only recall negative feedback.

I haven't watched the story in full so I'm not sure if he was ever meant to be anything but a con artist. I think it's an interesting story idea for Phoebe but I might have told the story several years earlier.

Wade was meant to be a con-artist trying to bilk Phoebe out of her money, and I believe he did succeed in breaking up Phoebe/Langley.. while I believe he was related to Robin (Hunter Tylo) who either knew about his plan and got second thoughts.. or was in the dark about it. I think a combination of the Wade conning Phoebe, Robin, and Skye were the reasons why Hilary dumped Tad and he left town with his tail between his legs.

Watching those June 1986 episodes, I was surprised Edna was still on the show especially since Dottie had already left the show by that time. I also smiled seeing Tom/Erica being so friendly and warm with one another... it's a shame the show never thought to interact them more in the 90s. It looks as though this Skye was being tested with Tom during this time.. and I'm going to say that I've never understood the love Robin Christopher got (she had a very unlikable vibe and was quite frankly a boring Skye & Lorna).

On 6/25/2026 at 8:56 PM, Jonathan said:

Jack's storyline about his heart condition is just starting and will be quickly dropped. 😂

HA yes this has been one of those moments with this rewatch where I was thinking--I watched the show SOO closely at this time, and have absolutely, positively, ZERO recollection of this.

They've made quite a lot of use of PVU frat student Jason--he has a friendship/flirty thing with Dixie (which is hilarious to watch as she really doesn't, umm, seem his type) but also is friends with Matteo who he parties with, and brags about all the crazy frat parties. The actor is typically 90s hot but not a great actor (not awful and he has a lot of awkward lines to deliver.) I'm wondering if, with a new actor, this becomes Jason, Kevin Sheffield's homophobic older brother who works at the Cutting Edge and has a crush on Dixie (I'm guessing... yes? But when I first watched I don't think I made the connection.)

Edited 14 hours ago14 hr by EricMontreal22

I came across in my "soap research" box some photocopies I have of Megan McTavish 1995 and 1998 correspondences with Angela Shapiro and other various ABC execs (not stuff from her "memoir.") I haven't scanned them but might take pics of some page but MAN they make McTavish look even worse than her memoir--though to be fair this stuff was never meant to be seen by the public (why it ended up among Agnes Nixon's papers is beyond me.) Stuff like her turning down story ideas for certain characters because the actor "is a terrible actor."

But a couple of tidbits. In the proposal for the original Janet bombs Trevor and Laurel's wedding, Del was meant to die but more importantly Erica was meant to be harmed in it too and THAT'S what causes her back pain and addiction.

In 1998 she proposes a storyline where Kelsey (who she points out from audience reaction reports no one likes any more) feels sorry for herself, goes out and gets "[!@#$%^&*]ed" by a stranger (she apologizes for using that word but says it's important) who leaves her in her car and feeling sorry for herself she tells everyone she was raped, and ends up blaming Ryan. (McTavish points out that no one in the audience likes Kelsey anymore so she's perfect to tell this timely story about false rape claims) At the trial the man who raped her "Colin" shows up and announces it was consensual and we find out it's Ryan's brother. So obviously this morphed into the "beloved" Ryan/Braden/Kit rape storyline...

McTavish is obsessed in all of these notes to ABC execs with the fact that they need to build up the under 34 demo--that's their future audience, and to kill off characters like Tom (too many old characters anyway.) She mentions a story meeting where an ABC exec came in (this was 1995) and said that they NEED to tell sensation stories like Days of Our Lives although "perhaps not go so low as possession" and how as soon as the exec left the room, Agnes Nixon, Corley and everyone else said they disagreed and their core base wanted stories based on emotions--everyone but McTavish who reassures the exec she's writing to that she KNOWS they need more sensation and that "Aggie" is wrong when she says she doesn't think AMC and DAYS share much of a fanbase anyway ("Why else would we have gained viewers with our Janet well story so much so that DAYS copied it the next year"--I assume the buried alive story.)

It's hysterical how much she bad mouths Agnes. In an April 1999 letter in reply to Angela Shapiro saying she's finding the show boring or something, she goes through the storylines one by one and basically says every single story Shapiro didn't like were ones Agnes wrote and forced on McTavish (to be fair this includes stuff involving Becka who McTavish says feels like a soap character from 30 years ago and doesn't work--something I agreed with.) Of course McTavish was fired the next month and replaced by Agnes Nixon herself officially....

Back to 1995 shortly before she was first fired, she writes about a story meeting where Agnes Nixon had the other writers write up proposals and go through them one by one. She says that Agnes LOVED Hal and Jeff's proposals which largely would play out as soon as McT is fired--Brooke's storyline with Laura and Janet's redemption. And McT points out how awful they are. Now we can argue these stories good or bad all we want (interesting as they're the episodes on PlutoTV right now--and mostly I'm a fan.) But McT's reasoning to the network heads as to why she knows they're bad are... Well Brooke's is bad because Brooke is old and doesn't appeal to the 18-34 except maybe as a matriarch-tentpole character (she is all for rekindling her romance with Adam which they do pursue) And also as it references Brooke's daughter Laura being killed, it's a deeply depressing storyline which the young viewers won't want either (funny--McT's writing often feels quite depressing, but she often complains here how other people are writing depressing stuff.) Janet she points out should NEVER be a nuanced character and they have to keep as a full out villain "like DAYS' Stefano--that's what our soap needs." SHe goes on at some length about how no audience ever wants to sympathize with Janet, and if they try to pair her with any of the men on the show (like Jack or Tad, she says) it will make those men look weak and no longer have any sex interest to viewers.

Oh she also complains that Agnes is out of touch because she complained about some story McTavish was writing that it was all "sensational incident" after sensational incident, and Agnes didn't realize that that's what has to drive the show if they want to win back the young Days audience (she also points out--for some reason--that Agnes just thinks Days right now is "trash" I hope James Reilley never heard her say that :P )

And these reports get worse... I guess in all cases McTavish was writing them when it was clear that she was going to be fired--but it's amazing how she has no shame about throwing every other writer/and her EP under the bus and is shameless about how ruthlessly they really needs to turn AMC more into DAYS. And then there's the long story projection she gives for the rest of 1999 (NONE of which was implemented as when she was fired this time it was all dropped.)

11 minutes ago, EricMontreal22 said:

In 1998 she proposes a storyline where Kelsey (who she points out from audience reaction reports no one likes any more) feels sorry for herself, goes out and gets "[!@#$%^&*]ed" by a stranger (she apologizes for using that word but says it's important) who leaves her in her car and feeling sorry for herself she tells everyone she was raped, and ends up blaming Ryan. (McTavish points out that no one in the audience likes Kelsey anymore so she's perfect to tell this timely story about false rape claims) At the trial the man who raped her "Colin" shows up and announces it was consensual and we find out it's Ryan's brother. So obviously this morphed into the "beloved" Ryan/Braden/Kit rape storyline...

This is so Megan it's comical. She lives up to every story about her and then some.

Your wealth of knowledge and research remains staggering. I'd also love to see anything you care to pass along in future.

Hey Eric, thanks for spilling some tea. This BTS stuff is gold. It must happen at every soap and we get fed the 'creative differences' line.

Please keep those tales coming.

Edited 10 hours ago10 hr by Paul Raven

Thanks both of you—I had forgotten I had all of this kept away in boxes and haven't looked at it in ten years or so. I don't think I can or should take photos and share then due to certain connections (including my friendship with one if the writers) and how Igot them but I’m stuck on house test all day today so plan on a much more detailed report with quotes later on. As Vee says (and I’m almost disappointed to say this as someone who at least sometimes is a McT defender) almost everything here even more than her memoir is amazingly exactly what you’d expect from the worst of her. Also, this might be due to these being written when she feared for her job and was trying to convince the network heads of how she would change things, but it’s -fascinating- how every plot idea or rejection she pitches here comes first and primarily from trying to read what would appeal to the demos, to the Q levels for actors, to the viewer panels, etc. in a way I can’t remember ever seeing a soap writer discuss their technique before (granted partly because even if that was driving key stories they’d never so shamelessly own up to it).

Stay tuned.

1 hour ago, EricMontreal22 said:

I came across in my "soap research" box some photocopies I have of Megan McTavish 1995 and 1998 correspondences with Angela Shapiro and other various ABC execs (not stuff from her "memoir.") I haven't scanned them but might take pics of some page but MAN they make McTavish look even worse than her memoir--though to be fair this stuff was never meant to be seen by the public (why it ended up among Agnes Nixon's papers is beyond me.) Stuff like her turning down story ideas for certain characters because the actor "is a terrible actor."

But a couple of tidbits. In the proposal for the original Janet bombs Trevor and Laurel's wedding, Del was meant to die but more importantly Erica was meant to be harmed in it too and THAT'S what causes her back pain and addiction.

In 1998 she proposes a storyline where Kelsey (who she points out from audience reaction reports no one likes any more) feels sorry for herself, goes out and gets "[!@#$%^&*]ed" by a stranger (she apologizes for using that word but says it's important) who leaves her in her car and feeling sorry for herself she tells everyone she was raped, and ends up blaming Ryan. (McTavish points out that no one in the audience likes Kelsey anymore so she's perfect to tell this timely story about false rape claims) At the trial the man who raped her "Colin" shows up and announces it was consensual and we find out it's Ryan's brother. So obviously this morphed into the "beloved" Ryan/Braden/Kit rape storyline...

McTavish is obsessed in all of these notes to ABC execs with the fact that they need to build up the under 34 demo--that's their future audience, and to kill off characters like Tom (too many old characters anyway.) She mentions a story meeting where an ABC exec came in (this was 1995) and said that they NEED to tell sensation stories like Days of Our Lives although "perhaps not go so low as possession" and how as soon as the exec left the room, Agnes Nixon, Corley and everyone else said they disagreed and their core base wanted stories based on emotions--everyone but McTavish who reassures the exec she's writing to that she KNOWS they need more sensation and that "Aggie" is wrong when she says she doesn't think AMC and DAYS share much of a fanbase anyway ("Why else would we have gained viewers with our Janet well story so much so that DAYS copied it the next year"--I assume the buried alive story.)

It's hysterical how much she bad mouths Agnes. In an April 1999 letter in reply to Angela Shapiro saying she's finding the show boring or something, she goes through the storylines one by one and basically says every single story Shapiro didn't like were ones Agnes wrote and forced on McTavish (to be fair this includes stuff involving Becka who McTavish says feels like a soap character from 30 years ago and doesn't work--something I agreed with.) Of course McTavish was fired the next month and replaced by Agnes Nixon herself officially....

Back to 1995 shortly before she was first fired, she writes about a story meeting where Agnes Nixon had the other writers write up proposals and go through them one by one. She says that Agnes LOVED Hal and Jeff's proposals which largely would play out as soon as McT is fired--Brooke's storyline with Laura and Janet's redemption. And McT points out how awful they are. Now we can argue these stories good or bad all we want (interesting as they're the episodes on PlutoTV right now--and mostly I'm a fan.) But McT's reasoning to the network heads as to why she knows they're bad are... Well Brooke's is bad because Brooke is old and doesn't appeal to the 18-34 except maybe as a matriarch-tentpole character (she is all for rekindling her romance with Adam which they do pursue) And also as it references Brooke's daughter Laura being killed, it's a deeply depressing storyline which the young viewers won't want either (funny--McT's writing often feels quite depressing, but she often complains here how other people are writing depressing stuff.) Janet she points out should NEVER be a nuanced character and they have to keep as a full out villain "like DAYS' Stefano--that's what our soap needs." SHe goes on at some length about how no audience ever wants to sympathize with Janet, and if they try to pair her with any of the men on the show (like Jack or Tad, she says) it will make those men look weak and no longer have any sex interest to viewers.

Oh she also complains that Agnes is out of touch because she complained about some story McTavish was writing that it was all "sensational incident" after sensational incident, and Agnes didn't realize that that's what has to drive the show if they want to win back the young Days audience (she also points out--for some reason--that Agnes just thinks Days right now is "trash" I hope James Reilley never heard her say that :P )

And these reports get worse... I guess in all cases McTavish was writing them when it was clear that she was going to be fired--but it's amazing how she has no shame about throwing every other writer/and her EP under the bus and is shameless about how ruthlessly they really needs to turn AMC more into DAYS. And then there's the long story projection she gives for the rest of 1999 (NONE of which was implemented as when she was fired this time it was all dropped.)

Wow - thanks for summarizing/posting! I'd love to read these things. The Kelsey story is very interesting. I loved Kelsey and Bobby, but admittedly I don't really remember how that ended or how Kelsey left the show (I need to revisit that era).

2 hours ago, EricMontreal22 said:

I came across in my "soap research" box some photocopies I have of Megan McTavish 1995 and 1998 correspondences with Angela Shapiro and other various ABC execs (not stuff from her "memoir.") I haven't scanned them but might take pics of some page but MAN they make McTavish look even worse than her memoir--though to be fair this stuff was never meant to be seen by the public (why it ended up among Agnes Nixon's papers is beyond me.) Stuff like her turning down story ideas for certain characters because the actor "is a terrible actor."

But a couple of tidbits. In the proposal for the original Janet bombs Trevor and Laurel's wedding, Del was meant to die but more importantly Erica was meant to be harmed in it too and THAT'S what causes her back pain and addiction.

In 1998 she proposes a storyline where Kelsey (who she points out from audience reaction reports no one likes any more) feels sorry for herself, goes out and gets "[!@#$%^&*]ed" by a stranger (she apologizes for using that word but says it's important) who leaves her in her car and feeling sorry for herself she tells everyone she was raped, and ends up blaming Ryan. (McTavish points out that no one in the audience likes Kelsey anymore so she's perfect to tell this timely story about false rape claims) At the trial the man who raped her "Colin" shows up and announces it was consensual and we find out it's Ryan's brother. So obviously this morphed into the "beloved" Ryan/Braden/Kit rape storyline...

McTavish is obsessed in all of these notes to ABC execs with the fact that they need to build up the under 34 demo--that's their future audience, and to kill off characters like Tom (too many old characters anyway.) She mentions a story meeting where an ABC exec came in (this was 1995) and said that they NEED to tell sensation stories like Days of Our Lives although "perhaps not go so low as possession" and how as soon as the exec left the room, Agnes Nixon, Corley and everyone else said they disagreed and their core base wanted stories based on emotions--everyone but McTavish who reassures the exec she's writing to that she KNOWS they need more sensation and that "Aggie" is wrong when she says she doesn't think AMC and DAYS share much of a fanbase anyway ("Why else would we have gained viewers with our Janet well story so much so that DAYS copied it the next year"--I assume the buried alive story.)

It's hysterical how much she bad mouths Agnes. In an April 1999 letter in reply to Angela Shapiro saying she's finding the show boring or something, she goes through the storylines one by one and basically says every single story Shapiro didn't like were ones Agnes wrote and forced on McTavish (to be fair this includes stuff involving Becka who McTavish says feels like a soap character from 30 years ago and doesn't work--something I agreed with.) Of course McTavish was fired the next month and replaced by Agnes Nixon herself officially....

Back to 1995 shortly before she was first fired, she writes about a story meeting where Agnes Nixon had the other writers write up proposals and go through them one by one. She says that Agnes LOVED Hal and Jeff's proposals which largely would play out as soon as McT is fired--Brooke's storyline with Laura and Janet's redemption. And McT points out how awful they are. Now we can argue these stories good or bad all we want (interesting as they're the episodes on PlutoTV right now--and mostly I'm a fan.) But McT's reasoning to the network heads as to why she knows they're bad are... Well Brooke's is bad because Brooke is old and doesn't appeal to the 18-34 except maybe as a matriarch-tentpole character (she is all for rekindling her romance with Adam which they do pursue) And also as it references Brooke's daughter Laura being killed, it's a deeply depressing storyline which the young viewers won't want either (funny--McT's writing often feels quite depressing, but she often complains here how other people are writing depressing stuff.) Janet she points out should NEVER be a nuanced character and they have to keep as a full out villain "like DAYS' Stefano--that's what our soap needs." SHe goes on at some length about how no audience ever wants to sympathize with Janet, and if they try to pair her with any of the men on the show (like Jack or Tad, she says) it will make those men look weak and no longer have any sex interest to viewers.

Oh she also complains that Agnes is out of touch because she complained about some story McTavish was writing that it was all "sensational incident" after sensational incident, and Agnes didn't realize that that's what has to drive the show if they want to win back the young Days audience (she also points out--for some reason--that Agnes just thinks Days right now is "trash" I hope James Reilley never heard her say that :P )

And these reports get worse... I guess in all cases McTavish was writing them when it was clear that she was going to be fired--but it's amazing how she has no shame about throwing every other writer/and her EP under the bus and is shameless about how ruthlessly they really needs to turn AMC more into DAYS. And then there's the long story projection she gives for the rest of 1999 (NONE of which was implemented as when she was fired this time it was all dropped.)

Good lord, Megan, if you loved Days of Our Lives so much, you should have written for it. (Also, I believe the alleged 1992 ripoff of Natalie in the well would be Marlena in the pit.)

I didn't like the Brooke and nuLaura storyline. I think with a better younger actress, it could have been better. Laura Roman always had an angry face which made it hard to root for her.

I didn't mind a redemption storyline for Janet but I HATED that she and Trevor ended up a couple. It made no sense after all Janet did to Natalie and Trevor. It's one thing for Trevor to forgive her. But to marry her? Oh gosh.

Edited 7 hours ago7 hr by Jonathan

8 hours ago, EricMontreal22 said:

I came across in my "soap research" box some photocopies I have of Megan McTavish 1995 and 1998 correspondences with Angela Shapiro and other various ABC execs (not stuff from her "memoir.") I haven't scanned them but might take pics of some page but MAN they make McTavish look even worse than her memoir--though to be fair this stuff was never meant to be seen by the public (why it ended up among Agnes Nixon's papers is beyond me.) Stuff like her turning down story ideas for certain characters because the actor "is a terrible actor."

But a couple of tidbits. In the proposal for the original Janet bombs Trevor and Laurel's wedding, Del was meant to die but more importantly Erica was meant to be harmed in it too and THAT'S what causes her back pain and addiction.

In 1998 she proposes a storyline where Kelsey (who she points out from audience reaction reports no one likes any more) feels sorry for herself, goes out and gets "[!@#$%^&*]ed" by a stranger (she apologizes for using that word but says it's important) who leaves her in her car and feeling sorry for herself she tells everyone she was raped, and ends up blaming Ryan. (McTavish points out that no one in the audience likes Kelsey anymore so she's perfect to tell this timely story about false rape claims) At the trial the man who raped her "Colin" shows up and announces it was consensual and we find out it's Ryan's brother. So obviously this morphed into the "beloved" Ryan/Braden/Kit rape storyline...

McTavish is obsessed in all of these notes to ABC execs with the fact that they need to build up the under 34 demo--that's their future audience, and to kill off characters like Tom (too many old characters anyway.) She mentions a story meeting where an ABC exec came in (this was 1995) and said that they NEED to tell sensation stories like Days of Our Lives although "perhaps not go so low as possession" and how as soon as the exec left the room, Agnes Nixon, Corley and everyone else said they disagreed and their core base wanted stories based on emotions--everyone but McTavish who reassures the exec she's writing to that she KNOWS they need more sensation and that "Aggie" is wrong when she says she doesn't think AMC and DAYS share much of a fanbase anyway ("Why else would we have gained viewers with our Janet well story so much so that DAYS copied it the next year"--I assume the buried alive story.)

It's hysterical how much she bad mouths Agnes. In an April 1999 letter in reply to Angela Shapiro saying she's finding the show boring or something, she goes through the storylines one by one and basically says every single story Shapiro didn't like were ones Agnes wrote and forced on McTavish (to be fair this includes stuff involving Becka who McTavish says feels like a soap character from 30 years ago and doesn't work--something I agreed with.) Of course McTavish was fired the next month and replaced by Agnes Nixon herself officially....

Back to 1995 shortly before she was first fired, she writes about a story meeting where Agnes Nixon had the other writers write up proposals and go through them one by one. She says that Agnes LOVED Hal and Jeff's proposals which largely would play out as soon as McT is fired--Brooke's storyline with Laura and Janet's redemption. And McT points out how awful they are. Now we can argue these stories good or bad all we want (interesting as they're the episodes on PlutoTV right now--and mostly I'm a fan.) But McT's reasoning to the network heads as to why she knows they're bad are... Well Brooke's is bad because Brooke is old and doesn't appeal to the 18-34 except maybe as a matriarch-tentpole character (she is all for rekindling her romance with Adam which they do pursue) And also as it references Brooke's daughter Laura being killed, it's a deeply depressing storyline which the young viewers won't want either (funny--McT's writing often feels quite depressing, but she often complains here how other people are writing depressing stuff.) Janet she points out should NEVER be a nuanced character and they have to keep as a full out villain "like DAYS' Stefano--that's what our soap needs." SHe goes on at some length about how no audience ever wants to sympathize with Janet, and if they try to pair her with any of the men on the show (like Jack or Tad, she says) it will make those men look weak and no longer have any sex interest to viewers.

Oh she also complains that Agnes is out of touch because she complained about some story McTavish was writing that it was all "sensational incident" after sensational incident, and Agnes didn't realize that that's what has to drive the show if they want to win back the young Days audience (she also points out--for some reason--that Agnes just thinks Days right now is "trash" I hope James Reilley never heard her say that :P )

And these reports get worse... I guess in all cases McTavish was writing them when it was clear that she was going to be fired--but it's amazing how she has no shame about throwing every other writer/and her EP under the bus and is shameless about how ruthlessly they really needs to turn AMC more into DAYS. And then there's the long story projection she gives for the rest of 1999 (NONE of which was implemented as when she was fired this time it was all dropped.)

Thank you for sharing all these details (and if you don't think you should share any more I totally get that).

McTavish would, whether for PR or genuine belief, later claim the Kit story had been a mistake, although I think she framed it as being a mistake because it meant viewers hated the character. Some of her writing had such misogyny I could see her wanting to tell a "cry rape" story.

To be honest, if you had given Kelsey this story in 1996, I could have believed it. She was in a terrible place and could have lashed out at Bobby or Edmund. By 1998 she had grown more as a person. And giving someone this type of story just because viewers didn't like them just suggests you don't care about character-based storylines and the message of false rape is the paramount importance.

As for some of her other statements, they are an instance of (not for the first time with McTavish), right message, wrong messenger.

Even though the idea of Brooke finding a new Laura was poignant (in spite of her being named Laura being a little too on the nose) I don't really think viewers ever connected with the Brooke/Laura story. Laura was most popular as a character early on when she was close to Janet. It was all downhill from there. The show decided to make viewers choose between Janet and Brooke in that story and it didn't make Brooke come across all that well. When I would read some fan comments at this time, especially online, they were not very kind about Brooke. In some ways the character did feel aged out, not far off how McTavish viewed Tom (although killing Tom would have been depressing and pointless).

The homeless shelter was a nice idea in concept, but ultimately mattered little to the character or show beyond reinforcing that they didn't know what to do with Brooke. Whenever I think of it I think of the fan game out around this time where you could have Brooke go to her homeless shelter (which in the game she had no interest in actually running - other people did everything) and outside in neon lights there was BROOKE ENGLISH HOMELESS SHELTER.

This was part of a very lengthy period of various regimes, and presumably Agnes, having no idea what to do with Brooke. Many failed love interests and questionable storylines. She did have chemistry with Roscoe Born but you saw where that ended up. McTavish did tease her with Dimitri, which I think had promise, and the material she wrote for her in her 98-99 return wasn't bad - enough so that I didn't realize until now and her memoir how much dislike she seemed to have for Brooke and Barr.

On paper, I disagree with her that Janet couldn't be redeemed. Yet when I look at the result onscreen, even with Lorraine Broderick, a talented writer who championed a redeemed Janet, they did not really do all that much with the character. The whole Jonathan Kinder "three witches" story was fun, but otherwise she mostly just yearned to be a mother and then dated Jack a few times before the Janet/Trevor pairing. I didn't mind the pairing but I do think it was a bridge too far for longtime viewers.

McTavish did, presumably because she had no choice, give Janet some material during her second run without regressing her - the whole comedy caper with Axel (who I liked, although he was another character who just vanished), her apology scenes with Natalie's ghost, and then Harold dying (a very happy story, Megan!) After she left, someone did decide to regress Janet and then write her out.

She was also right about Becca, one of the most pointless characters (although many were there with her in AMC's last decade) and a character I mostly remember for inflicting Greenlee on me and for various articles about how Kathie Lee got Abigail Spencer a job.

Edited 2 hours ago2 hr by DRW50

8 hours ago, alwaysAMC said:

Wow - thanks for summarizing/posting! I'd love to read these things. The Kelsey story is very interesting. I loved Kelsey and Bobby, but admittedly I don't really remember how that ended or how Kelsey left the show (I need to revisit that era).

I think once Bobby exposed Kelsey's scams in their marriage he became a backburner character and then just left with Anita a year later. Kelsey stayed for another year, then went away to college or somewhere in summer/fall 1998. They had briefly teased her with Scott but Daniel Cosgrove left the show in 1998 so that never happened.

6 hours ago, Jonathan said:

I didn't like the Brooke and nuLaura storyline. I think with a better younger actress, it could have been better. Laura Roman always had an angry face which made it hard to root for her.

I thought Lauren Roman was initially likeable but then became very unpleasant. They seemed to realize this as they even gave her a story about being mean to Santa Claus. By the time she left she was more sympathetic but it was in extremely ugly circumstances no one wanted to sit through.

To be honest I'm mostly surprised the character was never killed off. Pratt would have gutted her if he'd met her.