Jump to content

AMC and OLTL Canceled!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Just read this on twitter: Have u heard? The ABC message boards have banned the word "boycott." Who needs a boycott with those poor replacement shows? No 1 will watch!

That's kind of amusingly sick.

AMC has a higher profile than OLTL (even if OLTL is older.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree that the healthiest attitude to take under these circumstances is just to accept the loss(es) and enjoy these shows as much as you can while you still can. Do I think ABC has cut off its nose to spite its face? Yes. Of course. These cancellations (including GH's, which is all but a done deal, AFAIC) will have a ripple effect throughout the rest of daytime and even television itself. Mark my words: within the next 2-3 years, daytime TV as we know it will essentially be no more. Once shows like "The View," "The Talk," "The Chew" and so on fail (not b/c they won't get numbers, but b/c those numbers won't grow year-to-year), the networks will cede that airtime to their respective news divisions in a last-ditch effort to hold onto it before giving up the hours to their affiliates outright. And daytime will be what Gloria Monty fought to get away from: nothing but "talking heads."

The question, though, is whether soaps will return. On the one hand, I'd love to think so (and post-ers such as Vee certainly make a great case for it, too). OTOH, as I've said before, those who want soaps to return have to rethink how we receive them b/c the traditional, five-day-a-week serial just cannot work anymore. The problem is, every alternative to that is just antithetical either to how we are trained to follow stories or to the nature of continuing drama itself.

So...[sigh]...no. Soaps, or continuing dramas, are dead. They're dead in the daytime; and they'll die in the primetime soon, too. In fact, they'll go the way of westerns, Saturday morning cartoons, even traditional sitcoms. And all will be replaced by infotainment (not "news," people, b/c that died a long time ago) and cheap, easy-to-download, easy-to-follow, D.I.Y. shows that essentially turn the cameras back on ourselves. It's everything George Orwell warned us about, and more.

[!@#$%^&*]. I gotta learn how to write novels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was mortified after I pressed the "Add Reply" button, but hell, it's true. I don't like it, but it's true. If it was just OLTL, random late night losers like Jimmy Fallon would feel more comfortable ridiculing the legacy of soap opera with some short, desperate one-liner about how unimportant a soap's cancellation is. At least with Lucci's name attached, those jerks would feel like assholes for going too far with the jokes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's not so much AMC, but Susan Lucci. She is well known by the non-soap viewing public. She makes news, and thus the cancellation of her show makes news. Add in the Kelly Ripa factor, and I guess the cancellation AMC get a little more exposure. However, in every press release I've read, after the initial "The show that Susan Lucci has called home for 40 years is being cancelled," OLTL has gotten equal press.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I honestl think the TV Guide network should do a soap...I just feel like it would work. Package it between one of those 'Where are the Now' shows and an entertainment show. Maybe the TV Guide network has become slightly irrelevant due to the "Guide" feature on digital cable, but they seem to do well.

They could do a 6 o'clock soap. 5 o'clock, some sort of "special", 6 o'clock: soap, 7 o'clock: E-News style show.

If the soap took off they could do a revamp.

4PM: Ugly Betty

5PM: Entertainment talk show.

530PM: Another talk/entertainment/extra-type show

6PM: Soap Opera

7PM: Soap Opera

8PM: Soap Opera

*these could be half hour too, I suppose*

9-11: Movie of the week, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well he's lied a lot so? Even according to Lynda Hirsch

Brian Frons, the head of ABC Daytime, is a liar.

"Forget that he lied to the press about "All My Children" and "One Life to Live" not being in danger of being canceled. Frons lied to his producers, actors and everyone who works on his shows.

Last week, actors from both shows were assured they had nothing to worry about. They were told speculation that the shows were going to be canceled was merely the press being pessimistic and in need of something to write about. A week later, he axes both of the shows. The actors were not told until after a release was sent to the press."

So just saying...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nope I agree with you. I have always felt ONE LIFE has sort of been handled with kid gloves from the get go because of it's rather liberal content...this is a show that featured a multitude of social intrigues surrounding African-Americans, Jewish, Irish-Catholics, and Polish-Americans front and center. I think as much as the network initially appreciated it for its diversity, Americans would have never embraced the show long term unless the introductions of Dorian Lord, Karen Wolek and the advent of the Buchanan family had been made.

Erik

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The show had decent ratings in its first few years, then declined as the country moved away from social issues, and Agnes began moving on. The big reason for the ratings increase was the hiring of Jacquie Courtney and George Reinholt. Then OLTL built on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • We're getting an actual personality and flaws for Ashley... so it's a good start.  I'm guessing that Derek is her first serious relationship and I think she's falling out of love with Derek.. just hasn't accepted that realization as of yet. I agree that the show was diving headfirst into an Andre/Ashley pairing in the first handful of episodes, but they backed off of it and I have two theories: - Andre/Dani had a rapport/chemistry.  Probably more so than MVJ or the writers anticipated so the show is probably exploring that avenue. - Based on the character template that Ashley was created from... having her stray with Andre would have been out of character and caused the audience to hate her so the show is now weaving in reasons why Ashley might be looking Andres way (i.e. grass is greener on the other side, inexperience, Derek being too basic/vanilla).  
    • Has anyone watched the Texas reunion interview? I haven't gotten to it yet although it'll probably mean more to the people who watched the show at the time.
    • Or, they could have recast the role and written the character better. Maybe too much to expect, but it was a choice. Surprised they never did. Was Raines ever popular? Wait. Wait. WAIT! THEY RETCONNED THAT AGAIN????
    • Hope you're feeling better @slick jones Came across another entry for House Jameson.  Unknown role on Guiding Light, 1958.
    • Greece, France and Luxembourg were my three clear favourites. I think Greece especially had a phenomenal staging. So beautiful. And Klavdia sang fantastic.

      Please register in order to view this content

      France also had beautiful staging and Louane sang her heart out. Finally Luxembourg, who had a vastly improved stage show compared to the national final, and I loved the nod to France Gall on the little tv screen in the dollhouse.  
    • LOL - literally just added an edit to my post, because as I'm watching live right now, Dahlia is swimming in the pool alone and there is Marcus.  So annoying. And Phillip just revealed himself to Rick. I have to stop watching now, but curious to see how those interactions go!
    •   LOL.  I realized this week's Lope montage also omitted the Paris remote Lope scenes with Kim Matula. I mean, they repeat stuff over and over and over. I have unintentionally memorized B&B scenes that I barely watched --- because it was repeated in dialogue and immediate flashbacks in following episodes over and over and over.  Yet somehow Brad thinks viewers (even casual views like myself) wouldn't notice the glaring omissions in the montage?  or as dragonflies said, the montage using Lope scenes that happened during the Steam marriage?
    • Well, you wont be happy at all because I think Marcus of all people shows up..you know they have to have a scene were Dahlia is swimming and Marcus joins her..despite the fact that he is a decade older then her. You could tell they were trying to make them the next big thing but then, just dropped it.  The whole wedding was also one of the reason McLaibey was so short term.
    • I would have bought it if Ed/Rick/Michelle were all there, but 1) Ed said he couldn't go because he had to work, to which even someone highlighted that he's chief of staff and could easily go if he wanted; 2) Michelle got on the plane with Rick to go, but J showed up and the Spaulding's kicked him off because why would they want another random teenager to go, so Michelle ran off the plane after him and Rick just let her go (haha, it was kind of dumb); and 3) Rick and A-M have barely said 2 words to each other in the 15 months I've been watching so far, so it was weird he's now just by himself with the Spauldings/Coopers.   But I know now why they're doing this, Rick is clearly there because Phillip has shown up. Very plot-driven, but at least I’m getting old flashbacks of Rick/Phillip during this.  Slight correction - Ed never showed up on the plane, just Rick and Michelle.  Ed had already made the decision he wasn't going. Once 'Slutchelle' (haha!) ran off, I thought it was so weird that Rick either didn't run off after her, or didn't call from the plane to tell Ed. It was only when Blake called Rick, who happened to be with Ed at the hospital, that he happened to tell Ed, in midair, "oh hey, you may want to go find Michelle, she ran off" hahaha. Yeah, I get that being a location shoot, they had to minimize the number of people, but to have Dahlia there over Bridget still irks me. I get it, at this point, Bridget wouldn't have any connections to any of the people there outside of Lucy, just still hurts. ETA: Ugh, and now Marcus shows up!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy