Jump to content

AMC: Hubbard birth spoilers


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 299
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Like I said, I never saw Jacob so I'm just throwing my own biases out there. Plus I'm always leery of dual roles. But who knows? Maybe it would work. Although, I see no reason to make DW play a dual role. Bring on a cool, calm, willing to step back black guy played by another actor and keep hot-headed, impetuous Jesse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But you see David can drug people, Ryan can threaten to hit women, JR can shove people out of windows & Tad can bury a man alive yet Jesse HAS to die!

Must, Has To, Always Will!

The irony & hypocrisy is hilarious.

Too bad he didn't. :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am VERY against the idea of killing Jesse... again. This is Jesse here, not Josh, I don't care if bringing him back was a "mistake", killing him off again would be an even huger one. If he does go to jail, I like the idea of Jacob bringing Cassie back to town to be with her mother at this time, the both of them lending their support when perhaps in her vulnerability she finds herself oddly leaning on and taking aggression out on Jacob. Or leaning on Greg as marceline suggested and an "I'm vulnerable" spark or two flies. No sleeping together in Greg or Jacob's case, nothing beyond some chemistry and mixed emotions, a kiss or two. Frankie looking on torn between his mom's feelings and his dad's respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I beg your pardon, but I hope you aren't including me as one of the hypocrites. Just b/c I think bringing Jesse back from the dead was regretful and that there's no way to redeem him (for lack of a better word) in light of the pending baby switch, that does not mean I categorically apologize for or whitewash the misdeeds of others ("who happen to be NOT Black"). There are plenty of folks in Pine Valley who deserve some bad karma, and Jesse isn't the only one for whom I think that "bad karma" should be in the form of death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's weird though, as Bergman credits Debbi with him taking over the role of Jack Abbot on Y&R. He said she was one of the first people that assured him he could play another role on a soap, and she was a Y&R fan at that time.

I wonder why he didn't like being paired with her romantically...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Really? I don't. As the audience for soaps has dwindled, so has the open-mindedness. I think plenty of people would freak the hell out at Cliff/Angie and unfortunately a lot of the people who wouldn't don't watch soaps anymore.

I never heard that either. IIRC, it was the bigotry and the way the show caved to it that he hated, not the pairing itself. Nothing's changed there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

EXACTLY.

First of all, no one should allow themselves to believe Angie could be happy only with Jesse (or Jacob). It's that kind of thinking, after all, that has bred so many insufferable pairings, both on AMC and on soaps in general. Plus, there are still those who remember when AMC tried to sell us on Angie w/ Cal Cummings. ;-)

Second, as much as I would love to bring back Cliff (w/ or w/o Nina) in order to restart the Cliff/Angie romance and stick it to those bigots who shot it down the first time, in my mind, it'd be more organic, for lack of a better word, for Greg to return to Pine Valley than it would Cliff. Greg, after all, is Jesse and Angie's closest friend; and whether he returns on the occasion of Jesse's death, or he returns b/c Jesse has landed himself in prison for charges stemming from the baby switch, he would want to be there for Angie - as a friend - b/c on top of everything else (her illness, her blindness, the baby switch, Jesse's death/imprisonment/exile/whatever), Jesse's absence from her life would remind him how he wasn't there for her before, the first time they'd lost Jesse; and this is his way to make up somewhat for that...

But if Jesse were to die...again...

Greg and Angie would know what it was like to live w/o the love of one's life. That, and their mutual appreciation for each other, would be the thing upon which to build a slow - slow - romance. (It must be slow-building, too, b/c throwing them together in a quick manner will make them both look extremely callous.) The more gradual their feelings progress, the more others around them - Tad, Opal, Krystal, Randi, Frankie (reluctantly, at first, of course, but Randi would help him come around), even Liza (who I could see standing up to the once-again-disapproving Enid Nelson, much to everyone's surprise - a move, by the way, that might redeem Liza somewhat from her current position as pariah, as well as plant the first seeds for a possible Greg/Liza union, should "Grangie" not work out) - the more the people in their lives begin picking up on the chemistry between them, the more I believe viewers will or could accept it - again, b/c it was done slowly and gradually, not crammed down everyone's throats, w/ everyone made to like it "or else."

At the same time, though, Greg realizes what others are saying is correct - namely, that he is becoming attracted to Angie - but there's a problem. Forget about Jenny; beginning a romance with Angie would feel like a betrayal against his best friend, Jesse! Fortunately, Jesse's spirit is there at the appropriate moment to tell him that although he personally cannot stand the idea of Angie being with anyone else, he could at least rest more peacefully knowing there was someone in her life like Greg who loved her and had only her best interests at heart. And Greg would finally feel comfortable enough to express his feelings to Angie.

That's when I would throw in the twist of Jacob Foster's unexpected return to Angie and Frankie's lives.

Because - I don't know, wild guess, but - kissing Black women creeped him the hell out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I already know what you're going to say, Jonathan, so spare me the "Khan = Megan McTavish" b.s., alright? I'm through pretending that [!@#$%^&*] doesn't bother me. Because it does. Just because I suggested one Megan-esque story idea for a character (Randi) I did not have a handle on at that time -- that doesn't mean I'm the hackiest hack who ever hacked. I've more talent in my damn pinky than that coked-up bitch had in her entire body. I know it, you know it, even Koko Barf knows it, and she'd come closer to being like MMT than I ever would. So STFU and have a seat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This makes me think of that famous quote from COOL HAND LUKE,  "What we've got here is failure to communicate." I did not bring up "apparently" to try to get across either truth or validity, but doubt. If I had been sure, I would have said something entirely different. But, I'm not trying to argue, I hear you & I will comply. Besides that, I will endeavor to word things differently. I am never against trying to improve. 
    • That’s been my main issue with his response. It didn’t feel that earned by what came before. Definitely needed to see more of the Richardsons as a full family unit prior to all of this.
    • Bingo! I thought the exact same thing. Martin's anger feels so out of place, because we've hardly seen him interact with his parents. Vernon and him have more of a father/son relationship and we've seen their dynamic more fully play out. While obviously Ted and Marton are father and son, it felt a bit empty because we haven't really seen them bond or truly connect in any scenes.
    • Leslie inferred over 20 years ago, so Eva and Kat are over 20 at least 
    • As it happens, 40 years ago this week, ABC and CBS revealed their 1985-86 fall schedules. NBC revealed theirs the week before. ABC's would end up changing. The original plan for Tuesdays was to have Diff'rent Strokes lead the night, with He's the Mayor at 8:30, followed by Who's the Boss at 9, Growing Pains at 9:30, and Moonlighting at 10. There was some surprise over MacGruder & Loud not getting renewed, but it was considered part of Aaron Spelling's declining influence at the network. Yes, Dynasty was still a hit (for a while longer), but Aaron's shows steadily took up less and less of the schedule. Fall 1984: Seven hours, five of which were new programming (Dynasty, Hotel, Glitter, Matt Houston, T.J. Hooker, The Love Boat, Finder of Lost Loves; MacGruder & Loud aired at midseason, by which time Glitter was gone.). Fall 1985: Five hours, two of which were new programming (Dynasty, Hotel, The Colbys, Hollywood Beat, The Love Boat). Fall 1986: Three-and-a-half hours, a half-hour of which was new programming (Dynasty, Hotel, The Colbys, Life With Lucy). Fall 1987: Two hours, none of which was new programming (Dynasty and Hotel; HeartBeat premiered at midseason). Fall-winter 1988: Two hours, none of which was new programming (Dynasty and HeartBeat). This led to Variety's infamous shady headline in spring 1989: "Aaron's Dynasty Over"
    • I hope for a multi-year renewal, too! This is the only show I've been excited to see the next episode in forever. Considering their demos are quite decent. the initial episodes showed there is still an interest in daytime, and it has helped to boost the rest of the soap line up at times, it should be around for a while. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree.  How many times did we have to watch Bobby vs. J.R., or Blake vs. Alexis, knowing that nothing would change at the end, and that everything would go back to status quo, so that they could fight the same, exhausting battles all over again?  If nothing else, I give FC and KL credit for trying to keep things fresh, even if I think FC, in particular, went too far in the other direction and became unrecognizable even to the most diehard fans. Exactly.  Plus, because viewers were so burned out by the kind of serialized storytelling that was beginning to affect even half-hour comedies, I think MSW represented a nice change of pace.  You didn't have to watch every week, or watch from the beginning of each season, to know what was going on with Miss Fletcher.  Instead, you could watch a complete story in one episode, de-stress from whatever had happened in your own life last week, gear yourself up for the week ahead, and be okay. If you notice, though, there were differences between those two shows and what Aaron Spelling had produced in the past.  For one thing, there was a greater emphasis on youth; and while characters on 90210 and MP certainly had more disposable incomes than the average viewer, their wealth wasn't as opulent as what we'd seen on DYNASTY or on "Hart to Hart."  Even the battles among Alison, Amanda, Billy and others at that advertising agency weren't as histrionic as those between Denver Carrington and ColbyCo.
    • I saw a conversation yesterday with Liam with the 7 dwarves hat and Steffy -  I know she did not say re: Hope and Liam said - well look at Finn and you forgave him right?      I know I did not hear Steffy say “well but you can’t compare that to…”  For *uck sake someone call the bitch out!?     You’re right, we shouldn’t compare your forgiveness for the dude with devil spawn seed whose daughter locked you in a cage along with crazy stepmom/mom/Grandmother who has also SHOT YOU BOTH - and multiple murder attempts but you have to exist with them / Hope’s part in a takeover which you know was FAR LESS THAN CARTER BECAUSE HOPE IS NOT AN ATTORNEY…. Goodness no, no the same thing at alllllllll.   When they do Steffy’s absence at least let it be because they all find out what a manipulative ho she is in her own right.      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy