Members JarrodMFiresofLove Posted July 2, 2018 Members Share Posted July 2, 2018 Why not put him on GL? I do think Goutman was instrumental in bringing him over to AW because of their work together on AW. Also they could have renewed Eplin's contract and kept him on ATWT. He had a lot of fans. I still think it was a mistake killing that character. I never watched AW and didn't see any of his early stuff in Bay City, but I thought the character was a tremendous asset to the Oakdale scene. Molly kind of floundered after Jake's death. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Khan Posted July 2, 2018 Members Share Posted July 2, 2018 (edited) Actually, he named Holden after Holden Caufield, from J.D. Salinger's "The Catcher in the Rye." Just as Iva was named after Iva Archer, the widow of Sam Spade's fallen business partner, in "The Maltese Falcon." I always thought it odd how Darryl, who (IIRC) had been introduced as a former boyfriend of Margo's, shared the last name (Crawford) as her mother (pre-marriage, of course) and aunt. Did Margo ever note the coincidence? I can't recall. Edited July 2, 2018 by Khan 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Paul Raven Posted July 2, 2018 Members Share Posted July 2, 2018 Cass and Lila and Jake and Vicky came over because ATWT and AW aired in the same timeslot and CBS were hoping NBC viewers would switch allegiance in that timeslot. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Khan Posted July 2, 2018 Members Share Posted July 2, 2018 (edited) It might have made more sense during the James Stenbeck years, when the two men were virtually ATWT's version of Itchy and Scratchy. Well, there were OTHER factors that played into that decision. But I don't know whether I'm at liberty to say. It's a shame P&G didn't ask Robert Calhoun to succeed Ed Trach as the exec in charge for all their soaps. I feel like they would have been in much better hands with him than they were with Ken Fitts and especially MADD. Edited July 2, 2018 by Khan 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JarrodMFiresofLove Posted July 2, 2018 Members Share Posted July 2, 2018 That's right. It was P&G's way of bringing NBC's viewers over instead of them watching the show that had replaced AW. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Khan Posted July 2, 2018 Members Share Posted July 2, 2018 Also, when you think about how Irna (and Bill Bell) had intended AW to be an ATWT spinoff (before it ended up on NBC) and that the two shows DID share a character (Mitchell Dru) once upon a time, it just made more sense. IIRC, Stephen Schnetzer made several appearances on GL as Cass; and IMO, it was an odd fit. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JarrodMFiresofLove Posted July 2, 2018 Members Share Posted July 2, 2018 (edited) Speaking of Darryl and the reuse of names...his wife was named Carolyn. Marland had previously used the name Caroline as someone in Doug Cummings' past (a dead mother or dead wife, can't remember which, but there was a Caroline Cummings); and then Marland used the name Caroline when he named Iva's biological mother since Jared Carpenter's wife was Caroline Carpenter, and she had given birth to Iva. On GL, my favorite producer was Gail Kobe followed by Paul Rauch. On ATWT my favorite producer was Felicia Minei Behr then Chris Goutman. I think Calhoun and Caso were lucky that Marland was headwriter during their tenures. Not sure if their years would have seemed as good with lesser writers. Of course producing a show is more than budget and cost containment. I mentioned budget in my earlier comment to explain why Goutman may have used the vets less than he or fans may have liked. I think it's interesting how he used his wife for a role in 2008. Loved watching her on Search for Tomorrow in the 80s. She was on OLTL too. Edited July 2, 2018 by JarrodMFiresofLove 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members cassadine1991 Posted July 2, 2018 Members Share Posted July 2, 2018 I didn't know Stewart Cushing and Marcy were expecting a child around the time David Stewart died was the child ever mentioned again? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members P.J. Posted July 2, 2018 Members Share Posted July 2, 2018 John and Barbara bonded during some search for Lisa, IIRC. Or it was something to do with Martin Chedwyn. I can see on paper where it might seem like it could work, but Bryggman and Zenk had zero chemistry. That said, little Johnny's death was one well executed and deeply moving. Re: Jake....eh, I wasn't anti-Jake, but man did he eat a lot of screen time. Rebecca Hollen was Pat Kingsley, I don't recall any other Kingsley's. Didn't Duncan also know her and her husband? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members slick jones Posted July 2, 2018 Members Share Posted July 2, 2018 Patricia's late husband was Bertram. She was the only Kingsleythat was on the show. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Paul Raven Posted July 2, 2018 Members Share Posted July 2, 2018 Writers sometimes use names special to them ...Bill Bell in particular was known for this. Maybe there was a special Caroline in Marland's life? I know his mother's name was Beatrice and he used that name at AYWT, GL, GH and AW. Were there any Bea's/Beatrice at Loving or TD? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JarrodMFiresofLove Posted July 2, 2018 Members Share Posted July 2, 2018 (edited) I updated my post on Marland creations on page 495. There were about ten more I had come across on various websites. For example Corinne Lawrence and her daughter Monica. I'd forgotten about them. Also I removed Shannon and Hal, since they were introduced by Susan Horgan. Edited July 2, 2018 by JarrodMFiresofLove 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DRW50 Posted July 2, 2018 Members Share Posted July 2, 2018 Others have already explained it, but it always seemed like a "we don't know what to do with these people" scenario. I wonder how Broderick felt about Barbara as she was mostly a supporting figure throughout Broderick's tenure as headwriter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Soaplovers Posted July 2, 2018 Members Share Posted July 2, 2018 Maybe one of the several rejected Broderick story ideas involved Barbara? Barbara was kind of a difficult character to write at times. Didn't Marland decide to one day turn her into a femme fatale after getting fed up with losing one too many times? Was there backlash from this sudden 180 turn in character? And what Sheffer did to Barbara... eek! I liked someone's idea before of having Hunt Block play her brother Rick instead of Craig. It would have served the same function of causing conflict between Hal/Barbara since Rick could have broken the law.. and Barbara wanting to defend her brother... and Kim being in the middle since it involved her nephew. The whole Rosanna thing still would have worked as well.. and tied Rosanna in with the core family (I don't count the Snyders as a core family.. I count them as an infestation that ate away the show over time). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DramatistDreamer Posted July 2, 2018 Members Share Posted July 2, 2018 (edited) I'll fess up. I was the one that brought up Rick Ryan more than once over the years. Please register in order to view this content Except for a few storylines about 20 years prior, Rick was almost a complete blank slate in soap terms and could've been eased back onto the canvas. In terms of Barbara, writing a vixen probably gives the writer a freer hand in writing story. Oakdale already had its heroine in Kim Hughes and then you had several women (Betsy, Frannie, Margo 2.0) that were various shades of ingenue/heroine so the show needed a vixen and Barbara Ryan with her history of either being trod on or left wanting by the men in her life, likely fit the bill. The clever thing about how Barbara was written by Marland was that, even in the midst of her most twisted scheme, she always had a justification for it (even if it only made sense in her mind) and she could never taste complete satisfaction with her actions, even when she appeared to get away with something. More often than not though, her schemes were usually revealed and often in the most embarrassing of ways. Unlike today when some characters' actions are completely villainous yet they never seem to pay the price. Also, Marland humanized Barbara even at her worst. You never doubted she loved her son Paul. Only once did she really show anything short of love and adoration for Kim and Bob (during the entire Sabrina scandal revelation) and even that was out of a sense of sorrow over her mother Jennifer. Barbara was written with enough complexity that even after the affair with Tonio while he was married to Sierra (who Barbara repeatedly sold clothes to) and messing with Tom and Margo and turning vengeful against Brian and Shannon, you still believed that Barbara was actually capable of falling completely in love with Hal Munson. That's some good writing. Edited July 2, 2018 by DramatistDreamer 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.